Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029118
Original file (20100029118.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100029118 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the unit, D Company, 2nd Battalion, 82nd Airborne Division, he served with in the Republic of Vietnam be shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant makes no additional statements.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 29 April 1968.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).
3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to:

* Company D, 2nd Battalion, 505th Infantry, 82nd Airborne Division in the Republic of Vietnam from 6 November 1968 to 14 October 1969
* 2nd Battalion, 11th Infantry at Fort Carson, CO from 2 December 1969 to 
28 April 1970

4.  On 28 April 1970, he was released from active duty.  He completed 2 years of active service that was characterized as honorable.  Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) on his DD Form 214 contains an entry showing his last duty assignment was Company C, 2nd Battalion, 11th Infantry.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated the DD Form 214 was a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provided a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  

	a.  The Soldier's last assignment and major command was entered in Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of his DD Form 214.

	b.  It did not provide, nor was it intended to, for a detailed history of a Soldier's duties and assignments.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The DD Form 214 only provides for the entry of the last duty assignment of a Soldier when he is released from active duty or discharged.  His DA Form 20 did not indicate the company he was assigned to at Fort Carson.  However, the entry did indicate he was assigned to 2nd Battalion, 11th Infantry.  Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to conclude the entry in item 12 of his DD Form 214 is correct.

2.  The DD Form 214 does not provide, nor is it intended to, a detailed history of all of a Soldier's duties and assignments during his enlistment.  Therefore, there is no basis for entering the unit he served with in the Republic of Vietnam on his 
DD Form 214 because that unit was not his last duty assignment.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029118





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029118



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016076

    Original file (20100016076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214, effective 28 February 1972, shows in Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command): HHT 1/10 Cavalry, Sixth U.S. Army. The available evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was assigned to the 12th Cavalry Regiment while in the Republic of Vietnam. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004912

    Original file (20090004912.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Headquarters 173rd Airborne Brigade (Separate), Special Orders Number 116, dated 26 April 1967, show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge while a member of Company B, 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry, during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant's records do not contain orders that show he was awarded a second award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant held an infantry MOS and was assigned to an infantry battalion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021241

    Original file (20130021241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his last unit of assignment as Company B, 5th Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows his last duty assignment and major command as: Company B, 2nd Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division in the United States...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023478

    Original file (20110023478.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following evidence shows the applicant was in the 82nd Airborne Division: * An entry in Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, or Reductions) of his DA Form 24 * Orders, dated 15 July 1964 * DD Form 735 (Health Record – Abstract of Service) * DA Form 2376 (Notification to State Adjutants General Release from Active Duty of Obligated Reservist) DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. Since evidence shows his last duty assignment was HHC, 2nd Battalion, 325th Infantry which is a component of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010465

    Original file (20100010465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states, in effect, his item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows his duty military occupational specialty (MOS) was 11B (Rifleman) from 1 May 1969 through 7 January 1970. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and Army Commendation Medal....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010980

    Original file (20100010980.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show all of the awards and decorations he was authorized to wear on his uniform at the time he was on active duty, including the Army Good Conduct Medal, Presidential Unit Citation, Meritorious Unit Commendation, and French Fourragere. There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019297

    Original file (20090019297.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states he is unsure of his entitlement to the CIB, but he served in a front line combat unit in Vietnam and was wounded in action. It also shows that the unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 12 March 1968 to 4 October 1968 by Department of the Army General Order Number 48, dated 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012380

    Original file (20060012380.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There are no orders in his military records which awarded him the Combat Infantryman Badge, and there is no evidence in his military records that he served in active ground combat while assigned in Vietnam. Although the applicant contends that he was drafted into the Army of the United States, evidence of record clearly shows that he voluntarily enlisted in the Regular Army on 29...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015687

    Original file (20080015687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this same document had an entry which showed that he was awarded the CIB, but this entry, which did not contain an authority for awarding the CIB, was also struck through. There is no evidence that he performed duties in MOS 11 on his DA Form 20. Further, although he provides pictures from his service in the RVN, these pictures do not conclusively show that he was performing infantryman duties or that he was actively engaged in combat against the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017127

    Original file (20120017127.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * he received a general education diploma (GED) * he served with the 65th Engineer Battalion and then transferred to the 25th Infantry Division 2. He states his military record only shows his completion of 11th grade, but he received his GED. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...