Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017127
Original file (20120017127.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  23 April 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120017127 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show:

* he received a general education diploma (GED)
* he served with the 65th Engineer Battalion and then transferred to the 25th Infantry Division

2.  He states his military record only shows his completion of 11th grade, but he received his GED.  It also does not show his service with the 65th Engineer Battalion followed by transfer to the 25th Infantry Division.  He wants his military record to reflect his actual service and tours.

3.  He provides a letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 28 September 1966.

3.  His service record includes his DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) which shows he completed 11 years of education and a DA Form 3027 (U.S. Army Request for National Agency Check) which shows he attended Kotzebue Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) High School in Kotzebue, AK, from September to October 1965.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 32 (Civilian Education) that he completed the 11th grade at Kotzebue BIA High School in Kotzebue, AK, in 1965 and

	b.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) that he was assigned to Company A, 65th Engineer Battalion, 25th Infantry Division, in the Republic of Vietnam on 7 October 1967.

5.  Special Orders Number 223, dated 10 August 1968, published by Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, reassigned the applicant to the U.S. Army Vietnam Returnee Detachment for further assignment to the U.S. Army Transfer Station, Oakland Army Terminal, Oakland, CA.  These orders show he was assigned to Company A, 65th Engineer Battalion, at that time.

6.  He was released from active duty on 9 September 1968 after completing 1 year, 11 months, and 2 days of active military service.

7.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 11 years of civilian education in item 30 (Remarks).  Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of his DD Form 214 shows he was assigned to Company A, 65th Engineer Battalion, U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC), prior to his separation.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active service.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

9.  The American Council on Education drives the direction, design, and delivery of the GED testing program – the only nationally recognized program that awards high school equivalency credit.  According to the council's Internet website, the GED test is taken by individuals who did not obtain a high school diploma.  The GED tests were originally created to help veterans after World War II complete basic high school courses in preparation for returning to civilian life.  Common reasons for GED recipients not having received a high school diploma include immigration to the United States or Canada; homeschooling; and leaving high school early due to a lack of interest, the inability to pass required tests, or personal problems.  Individuals who pass the test receive a GED.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's service record is void of evidence and he has not provided any evidence which indicates he fulfilled the requirements for receiving a GED prior to his discharge on 9 September 1968.  Therefore, there is no basis for amending his DD Form 214 to show he holds a GED.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 currently reflects his last duty assignment and major command as Company A, 65th Engineer Battalion, USARPAC, which appears to be incomplete.  His DA Form 20 shows the 65th Engineer Battalion was part of the 25th Infantry Division.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his last duty assignment as "Company A, 65th Engineer Battalion, 25th Infantry Division, USARPAC."

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__x___  ___x_____  ____x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show his last duty assignment as "Company A, 65th Engineer Battalion, 25th Infantry Division, USARPAC."

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending his DD Form 214 to show he holds a GED.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120017127



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120017127



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012351

    Original file (20090012351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Valorous Unit Award, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Records show the applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015008

    Original file (20080015008.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) for the period ending 27 September 1953 be corrected to show the 65th Combat Engineer Battalion, 25th Infantry Division. This DD Form 214 does not show the Combat Infantryman Badge as an authorized award. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012327

    Original file (20140012327.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he extended his tour in Vietnam for 2 months * his DD Form 214 shows he served in Vietnam for only 11 months and 27 days * he served in Vietnam from April 1967 to June 1968 * he was only at Fort Hood, TX, for 4 months upon his return from Vietnam, but his DD Form 214 shows he was there for 6 months * he needs his DD Form 214 to show his correct foreign service credit for his Department of Veterans Affairs claim 3. The instructions stated to enter the total period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016405

    Original file (20110016405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states his DD Form 214 shows he has one ARCOM; however, it should show two ARCOMs and the PUC. There are no orders in the applicant’s record awarding him the ARCOM (2nd Award). _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006238

    Original file (20090006238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In order to make his accounts of traumatic stress more believable to his DVA doctors, the applicant requests his time served in Vietnam be increased. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years of high school. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000164

    Original file (20120000164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * His DD Form 214 * A letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 19 December 2011 * A copy of an envelope * Orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed 1 year, 1 month, and 9 days of foreign service and his most significant duty assignment was with the 65th Engineer Combat Battalion, Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014227

    Original file (20060014227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 26 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart, the "Machete" Bar, or the Panamanian-Pana Jungle Badge. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned to show award of the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007646

    Original file (20140007646.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 December 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140007646 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his second Bronze Star Medal be added to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) with an effective date of 14 December 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by: a. deleting the Bronze Star Medal and Vietnam Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007503

    Original file (20090007503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 12B when he was released from active duty. The evidence shows that at the time the applicant was assigned to Vietnam he held MOS 62F. He was promoted in MOS 12B and on his release from active duty, he held this MOS as his primary MOS and MOS 62F as his secondary MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001478

    Original file (20080001478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests the applicant be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam for a period of 5 months and 17 days, from 1 December 1964 to 18 May 1965. The evidence of record shows that Vietnam Service Medal was awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service (attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating...