Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029106
Original file (20100029106.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100029106 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect his participation in Operation Urgent Fury.  He also requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  He states he actually participated in this operation; however, it was not annotated on his DD Form 214.  He was told to expect the CIB for his actions.

3.  He provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After having prior active duty, he enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 December 1980 and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).

3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows the following information:

* Item 5 (Oversea Service) – no indication of service in Grenada
* Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) – does not show award of the CIB or indicate participation in Operation Urgent Fury

4.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 2-1 shows, in part, he was assigned to Company A, 2nd Battalion (Airborne), 325th Infantry Regiment, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, NC, from 11 September 1982 through 13 December 1983 during a period consistent with Operation Urgent Fury.

5.  On 13 December 1983, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) for completion of his Reserve obligation.  He completed a total of 2 years, 11 months and 14 days of net active service.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the CIB.

6.  His records are void of evidence to show he deployed in support of Operation Urgent Fury or was recommended for or awarded the CIB.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  The CIB is authorized for award for Grenada during the period 23 October to 21 November 1983.

8.  A brief history of the 82nd Airborne Division from the Wikipedia website shows that elements of the 82nd Airborne Division provided support to the 1st and 2nd Ranger Battalions in the invasion of Grenada on 25 October 1983.  The first 82nd Airborne Division unit to deploy was a task force of the 2nd and 3rd Battalions (Airborne), 325th Infantry Regiment.  The first aircraft carrying troopers from the 2nd Battalion (Airborne), 325th Infantry Regiment, touched down at Point Salinas 17 hours after notification, commanded by J____ L. H____ with Company A as the initial ready company.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the available evidence shows he was serving in an infantry MOS and assigned to an infantry unit, there is no evidence and he has not provided sufficient evidence to show he actually engaged in active ground combat.

2.  The available evidence shows he was assigned to Company A, 2nd Battalion (Airborne), 325th Infantry Regiment, during the period his unit deployed in support of Operation Urgent Fury.  However, his record contains no evidence and he has not provided sufficient evidence such as a manifest roster, deployment orders, or a leave and earnings statement that would serve to provide proof of his participation during this campaign.

3.  In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029106



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029106



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000656

    Original file (20150000656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AFEM is awarded for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in U.S. military operations, U.S. operations in direct support of the United Nations, and U.S. operations of assistance for friendly foreign nations. The available evidence of record fails to show that the applicant was ever assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 325th Infantry Regiment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001745

    Original file (20140001745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. he completed Airborne training; b. he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Combat Patch for service during mission Urgent Fury in Grenada, six awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), and awards of the Humanitarian Service Medal (HSM) for service in Grenada in 1983 and for security operations in Fort Indiantown Gap, PA during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014437

    Original file (20110014437.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his participation in Operation Urgent Fury (Grenada). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show the award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his participation in Operation Urgent Fury (Grenada). The available evidence clearly shows he served a qualifying period of service in Grenada in support...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075474C070403

    Original file (2002075474C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his participation in Grenada. The applicant states that he served in armed conflict in Grenada and should be entitled to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016677

    Original file (20140016677.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states: * he was part of the 82nd Airborne Division's Rapid Deployment Force, and a member of the 313th Military Intelligence Battalion * he participated in Operation Urgent Fury in 1983 in the U.S. military support of the people of Grenada 3. On 16 December 1985, he reenlisted in the RA and was awarded MOS 17K (Ground Surveillance Radar Crewman).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008801

    Original file (20120008801.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant states he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge while he was on active duty during the invasion of Grenada. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DD Form 214 the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008013

    Original file (20100008013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he filed for correction of his records within 3 years of the date of discovery of the error. The applicant's OMPF does not contain a record of the units to which he was assigned or the dates of his assignments. It does show he was in Panama at the time; however, the certificate did not reflect the inclusive dates he was assigned to the unit and it did not show he participated in Operation Urgent Fury.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007531

    Original file (20120007531.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant was deployed to Grenada during the period 24 October to 2 November 1983. a. Thus, it would be appropriate to show this period of foreign service in item 12f of his DD Form 214. c. This deployment was subsequent to the Army regulatory requirement to record Vietnam/Indochina service and prior to the change that authorized recording an overseas deployment in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001795

    Original file (20080001795.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, on file in the applicant's personnel record shows the Combat Infantryman Badge was added to his DD Form 214 on 25 September 1984. There is an absence of information in the applicant's service personnel record to show he was not qualified for award of the Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal, for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000274

    Original file (20070000274.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) the applicant was issued at the time of his discharge confirms he was discharged and his characterization of service was under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-5, (Personnel Separations) governs the requirements for listing military education on the DD Form 214. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to a general discharge or an honorable discharge.