Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028562
Original file (20100028562.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    9 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028562 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his entry level status separation be changed to an honorable discharge.  

2.  He states he needs an “honorable” discharge to get his job back and to prove his Selective Service obligation was met.  

3.  He provides no additional documents.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 18 December 1985 for a period of 8 years.  

3.  His record is void of any indication that he attended initial active duty training or was awarded a military occupational specialty (MOS).  

4.  On 12 August 1987, his company commander notified him of the pending USAR discharge for failure to attend training per his enlistment contract.  He was advised that he had the right to present any rebuttal or statements in his behalf at the next monthly assembly (15 August 1987) or he could waive his rights.  The company commander informed him that if he was separated under this program, he would receive an entry level status separation.  His Letter of Instruction indicated he was absent from his unit training assembly on 15 and 16 August 1987.  

5.  Headquarters, Fifth U.S. Army, Fort Sam Houston, TX, Orders 231-117, dated 2 December 1987, discharged him from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Enlisted Administrative Separations) with an entry level status separation, effective
2 December 1987.  

6.  Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides, in pertinent part, for the discharge or transfer to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) of statutorily obligated enlisted members who failed to participate satisfactorily in unit training as required.  The regulation applied[s] to enlisted Soldiers of the Army National Guard and of the USAR.  It states that the honorable characterization of service is appropriate when the quality of the Soldier’s service generally met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for military personnel, or was otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly be inappropriate.  

7.  Army Regulation 135-178 also provides that entry level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous active service.  Entry level status service will be described as uncharacterized if separation processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry level status.  Upon enlistment a Soldier qualifies for entry level status during:

	a.  The first 180 days of continuous active military service; or 

	b.  The first 180 days of continuous active service after a service break for more than 92 days of active service.  

	c.  A member of a Reserve component who is not on active duty or who is serving under a call or order to active duty for 180 days or less begins entry level status upon enlistment in a Reserve component.  Entry level status for such a member of a Reserve component terminates:
		(1)  180 days after beginning training if the Soldier is ordered to active duty for training for one continuous period of 180 days or more; or

		(2)  90 days after the beginning of the second period of active duty for training if the Soldier is ordered to active duty for training under a program that splits the training into two or more separate periods of active duty.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for an honorable discharge for the purpose of securing employment is acknowledged.  However, employment is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief in this case.  

2.  He was discharged from the USAR on 2 December 1987 for unsatisfactory participation with an uncharacterized entry level status discharge.  There is no evidence he served in an active duty training status or was awarded an MOS.

3.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary it is presumed that the applicant's discharge notification packet and subsequent discharge from the USAR was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.

4.  There is no apparent error or injustice on which to base recharacterizion of his service to show he served honorably.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  __X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028562



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028562



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001467

    Original file (20110001467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She further requests correction of item 35 (Record of Assignments) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II), to include: a. These orders show she was discharged from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 on 8 May 1987. The applicant also requested to add to item 35 of her DA Form 2-1 the dates she attended the scheduled UTAs, the 16 weeks she attended IADT, and the 3 days of ADT at Fort Gordon, GA. 7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022107

    Original file (20130022107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was released from IADT on 25 August 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, by reason of completion of IADT with uncharacterized service. Personnel included are members of the Army National Guard and the USAR separated: a. for physical disability under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), regardless of the period of time served on active duty; b. after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008847

    Original file (20130008847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her uncharacterized discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be changed to honorable or a general discharge. A memorandum, dated 7 September 1995, shows the applicant was notified of her pending USAR discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5. There is no evidence that indicates she was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed their military term of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018969

    Original file (20130018969.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the characterization of his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) service be changed to honorable and issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The doctor requested the applicant's release from service and stated the applicant was unable to continue in service. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated a DD Form 214 would be prepared for members of the USAR under the following circumstances: * after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007403

    Original file (20120007403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his uncharacterized discharge to show his character of service as honorable. He provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) * orders ordering him to initial active duty for training (IADT) * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Certificate of Training * orders discharging him from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * Honorable Discharge Certificate CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021020

    Original file (20140021020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was honorably discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations- Enlisted Personnel), , states in paragraph 3-9a(1) a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry-level status, except when characterization under other than honorable conditions is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017135

    Original file (20130017135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states: * her records contain several errors that she has tried to get corrected * she served (in the military) from 28 June 1989 to 12 November 1991 * her records show she was in an entry level status when she separated, but she was not * her records show she had no active service or less than 90 consecutive days of active duty training * she was in basic holdover and the count was over 90 days * after she completed basic training, she reported to her station during the required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000245

    Original file (20090000245.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 135-178 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Enlisted Administrative Separations) states that for the purposes of characterization of service, the Soldier’s status is determined by the date of notification as to the initiation of separation proceedings. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214 for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from the Active Army. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007420

    Original file (20130007420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * USAR discharge orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. However, Headquarters, 5th U.S. Army, Orders 140-11, dated 24 July 1991, show she was discharged from the USAR effective 24 July 1991 under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct), with an uncharacterized (entry-level status) separation. The available evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030246

    Original file (20100030246.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 27 October 1987, the applicant's company commander notified her that he was initiating action to discharge her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, for entry level status performance and conduct. For physical disability under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), regardless of the period of time served on active duty. Her service record is void of...