Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028335
Original file (20100028335.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028335 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 8 October 1967 be corrected to show his active duty service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) from February 1969 to June 1970.

2.  The applicant states:

* his DD Form 214 does not reflect his Reserve active duty service with Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 4th Brigade (Combat Support Training), 98th Division (Training), Amherst, New York
* his Reserve active duty service included weekend duties [unit training assemblies] and one 2-week "summer camp" [annual training period] during the period February 1969 to June 1970
* he was not issued an updated DD Form 214 upon being released from his Reserve active duty

3.  The applicant provides:

* assignment orders, dated 28 April 1970
* DD Form 214
* Honorable Discharge Certificate from the USAR, dated 30 June 1971
* Veterans Administration Certificate of Eligibility



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He was ordered to active duty on 9 October 1965 from the USAR.  He served as a military intelligence officer in Vietnam.  On 8 October 1967, he was released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training).

3.  He was honorably discharged from the USAR on 30 June 1971.

4.  There is no evidence of record which shows he served on active duty in the USAR during the period February 1969 to June 1970.

5.  His U.S. Army Administration Center Form 115 (Statement of Retirement Points), dated 22 September 1970, shows he received no active duty retirement points during the period 6 June 1969 to 5 June 1970.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  It states that a DD Form 214 will be prepared for Reserve Component Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous active duty for training, full-time National Guard Duty, active duty for special work, temporary tours of active duty, Active Guard Reserve service, or after completing initial active duty for training which resulted in the award of a military occupational specialty, even though the active duty was less than 90 days.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests his active duty service (weekend training assemblies and one 2-week annual training period) in the USAR during the period February 1969 to June 1970 be shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 8 October 1967.

2.  Since there is no evidence of record which shows he served on active duty in the USAR during the period February 1969 to June 1970 and the DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his separation from active duty, there is no basis for amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 8 October 1967.

3.  He also contends he was not issued an updated DD Form 214 upon his release from Reserve active duty.  However, there were no provisions for the issuance of a DD Form 214 for Reserve Component Soldiers ordered to active duty for a period of less than 90 days.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028335



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028335



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005787

    Original file (20120005787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. On 10 April 1974, Office of the Adjutant General, USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, published Letter Orders Number 040378 transferring him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014903

    Original file (20080014903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 17a (Current Active Service other than by Induction, Source of Entry) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 23 September 1970 be corrected to show he was not ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA). Headquarters, Sixth United States Army, Presidio of California Reserve Letter Orders Number A-01-0009, dated 8 January 1969, ordered him to active duty, effective 22 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029167

    Original file (20100029167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge (GD) to an honorable discharge (HD). The evidence shows he was examined by a psychiatrist who diagnosed him with a personality disorder that he found was not grounds for a medical discharge. Therefore, in view of all of the foregoing, the applicant's military service records should be corrected to show he was honorably discharged effective 14 April 1971 under the extraordinary provisions of the Department of the Army memorandum,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003155

    Original file (20140003155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, the following: * issuance of a DD Form 256 (Honorable Discharge Certificate) for his period of service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) showing his pay grade of E-5 * issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Transfer from Active Duty) for his period of service in the USAR 2. The only document he has left to claim is a DD Form 256 for his honorable discharge from his USAR, his pay grade of E-5, and a DD Form 214 for this time, if applicable. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002660

    Original file (20090002660.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show proof of his promotion to sergeant/pay grade E-5, all of his medals and awards, his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) units, and his units in the Republic of Vietnam. On 14 July 1988, the commander of the 341st Medical Group, Seagoville, TX, returned the applicant's request to his unit commander stating the request was incomplete and required a separate letter from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015012

    Original file (20080015012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant entered active duty for training on 29 March 1967 and was honorably released from active duty on 29 July 1967. His DD Form 214 correctly shows the dates of entry and separation and the net period of active service. It appears that the applicant’s periods of service documented on the NA Form 13041 were performed as part of his USAR training obligation and could not be entered on the DD Form 214 as they occurred outside the period covered by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010316

    Original file (20080010316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. However, that error was corrected when a DD Form 215 was prepared correcting his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 February 1970 to show his prior 2 years of active duty. There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant ever enlisted in the Regular Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026980

    Original file (20100026980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that: * he be issued a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) active duty service from 7 March 1998 to 1 December 1998 * item 23 (Authority and Reason) on his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) be amended 2. The evidence does show he was ordered to active duty from 6 June 1998 to 17 June 1998 for training and he performed weekend drills in 1998 but...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007230

    Original file (20130007230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 9 January 1970 to show in: a. item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), his rank and pay grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of private (PV2)/E-2; b. item 16 (Terminal Date of Reserve), his terminal date as 22 September 1975 instead of 21 May 1975; c. item 17c (Date of Entry), he entered active duty on 22 September 1969 instead 10 September 1969; and d. item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007957

    Original file (20130007957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the issuance of an "Honorable Discharge Medal" and a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant does not provide any evidence. There is no evidence he performed any active service of at least 90 consecutive days that would have qualified him for the issuance of a DD Form 214.