Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028049
Original file (20100028049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	   24 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028049


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states that he was absent without leave (AWOL) for 48 hours while stationed at Fort Hood, TX.  He states this AWOL period was because he had no transportation, phone, or funds to return to Fort Hood.  He concludes by stating he committed no crime or other violation.

3.  The applicant provides a letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 30 August 2010, which verifies relevant service information, including his dates of service, rank at time of separation, and his discharge characterization.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army, for a 3-year term, on 17 August 2004.  He completed one station unit training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).  

2.  His record shows he received developmental counseling on numerous occasions between 17 March and 10 April 2005, for instances of misconduct, including failure to follow orders, violation of Command policies, assault on a fellow Soldier, and being AWOL.  



3.  His records contain a continuation page of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), indicating he may have received nonjudicial punishment for violating a Command policy and disobeying a lawful order; however, the DA Form 2627 itself is unavailable for review. 

4.  On 9 June 2005, he was notified of the initiation of separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), chapter 14, for misconduct – pattern of misconduct.  

5.  On 9 June 2005, he acknowledged he had been advised by his counsel of the basis for the contemplated action to separate him under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, and its effect; of the rights available to him; and of the effect of any action taken by him to waive his rights.  He chose to not submit a statement in his own behalf.

6.  The separation authority approved his discharge due to misconduct and directed that he be given a general discharge under honorable conditions.

7.  On 8 July 2005, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, with a general discharge under honorable conditions.  His DD Form 214 confirms he completed 10 months and 16 days of creditable active service during this period of active duty.  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was private/E2.

8.  On 16 February 2010, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge.

9.  He provides a letter from the VA, dated 30 August 2010, which verifies relevant service information, including his dates of service, rank at time of separation, and his discharge characterization.  

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter.  However, the separation authority may direct a general discharge if such is merited by the Soldier’s overall record.  Only a general court-martial convening authority may approve an honorable discharge or delegate approval authority for an honorable discharge under this provision of regulation.

11.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for upgrade of his under honorable conditions discharge was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support this request.

2.  His administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would have jeopardized his rights.  The evidence of record shows he consulted with counsel and was advised of the basis for the separation action.

3.  Based on his record of indiscipline, including instances of misconduct, his service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.  Therefore, he is not entitled to an honorable discharge.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting his requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022260



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028049



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008101

    Original file (AR20090008101.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct in that he was AWOL (050320-050322), disobeyed lawful orders from NCOs, violated lawful general policies on numerous occasions, and assaulted another Soldier by kicking him in the face, with a general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012666

    Original file (AR20130012666.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 August 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. On 4 January 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001169

    Original file (20150001169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions and removal of the Record of Proceedings under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) from his military records. On 4 December 2014 after carefully considering the evidence of record and the evidence presented by the applicant, the ABCMR denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions and removal of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090017245

    Original file (AR20090017245.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 22 October 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012711

    Original file (AR20100012711.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge or a change to the narrative reason for separation. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013516

    Original file (AR20100013516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? With this said, she is asking that the board upgrade her discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022166

    Original file (20120022166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following corrections to his military records: * removal of three DA Forms 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File * upgrade his general discharge to honorable * change his narrative reason for discharge * change his reentry eligibility (RE) code from 3 to 1 * a fair evaluation of his medical records 2. The...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100019564

    Original file (AR20100019564.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 28 December 1998, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008233

    Original file (20080008233.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge and correction of his records as follows: a. correction of entries pertaining to lost time (4 April 1969 to 7 April 1969 and 1 May 1969 to 13 June 1969), in Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); b. correction of an entry pertaining to lost time (4 April 1969 to 7 April 1969), in Item 44 (Lost Time) of his DD Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); c. correction of the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006991

    Original file (20100006991.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, his record contains a properly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 10 September 1970 under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) in lieu of a court-martial with a character of service as under other than honorable conditions. There is no evidence his service in Vietnam led to his misconduct.