Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027498
Original file (20100027498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
   
		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100027498 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from "NA" (Not Applicable) to an RE-1.

2.  The applicant states he served his country in good faith and he twice deployed to a combat zone.  During his second deployment, he attained the rank/grade of sergeant/E-5, served as a squad leader, and maintained his personnel and equipment.  He desires to reenter military service.  

3.  The applicant provides his DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the periods ending on 23 July 2007 and 1 October 2009.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 24 July 2002 and held military occupational specialty 31B (Military Police).  He served in staff or leadership positions and attained the rank/grade of sergeant/E-5.  

2.  He was honorably released from active duty on 23 July 2007 under the provisions of chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of completion of his required active service.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligation.  

3.  His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows he completed 5 years of creditable active military service and he received an RE-1.
4.  On 7 September 2008, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  He served with the 211th Military Police Company in Iraq from 5 December 2008 to 2 September 2009.  

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 1 October 2009 under the provisions of chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of completion of his required service.  His DD Form 214 for this period of service show in:

* item 26 (Separation Code) - the entry "MBK"
* item 27 (Reentry Code) - the entry "NA" 

6.  He was ultimately discharged from the USAR on 27 July 2010 after having completed his military service obligation.

7.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and USAR.  Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes. A code of "1" applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.  They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.  

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that item 27 reflects the RE code.  Army Regulation 601–210 determines RA and USAR reentry eligibility and provides regulatory guidance on the RE codes.  These codes are not applicable to officers, U.S. Military Academy (USMA) cadets who fail to graduate or enter USMA from active duty status, or to Reserve Component Soldiers being separated for other than cause. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was in the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) when he was ordered to active duty.  Upon completion of his active service, he was honorably released from active duty back to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  By regulation, an RE code is not applicable in his case.  

2.  The applicant's patriotism and combat service are not in question.  However, his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 1 October 2010 appropriately shows the correct entry in the RE code block. 



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100027498





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100027498



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010737

    Original file (20100010737.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 March 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100010737 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Her records also show she transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on an unknown date. It states that item 27 shows the RE code.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012159

    Original file (20100012159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also states, "Reserve Component personnel being separated for other than cause will not be assigned RE codes. The evidence of record further shows the governing Army regulation states that RC [USAR] personnel being separated for other than cause will not be assigned RE codes and that "NA" will be entered in item 27 of the DD Form 214. Thus, the evidence of record confirms that the entry in item 27 of the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 April 1991 is correct as shown.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011234

    Original file (20130011234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of Item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "1" instead of "3." Only when there is evidence to support an incorrect RE code or when there is an administrative error will an applicant be advised to request a correction; b. an RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. They are fully qualified for enlistment if all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002059

    Original file (20110002059.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was honorably released from active duty on 7 October 2005 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service. Item 26 (Separation Code) of the DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows he was assigned code “LBK” for an involuntary release from active duty or transfer by reason of completion of required active service. However, the SPD/RE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011617

    Original file (20090011617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 27 (Reentry Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from RE-3 to RE-1 so he may reenter military service. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for a period of 4 years on 8 August 1996. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was released from active duty under the provisions of chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel) by reason...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003401

    Original file (20150003401.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The SPD code of "LBK" is the correct code for RA Soldiers involuntarily REFRAD for completion of required active service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 who sign a Declination of Continued Service Statement or are ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment at the completion of their enlistment. The SPD code of "MBK" is the code for Soldiers voluntarily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006529

    Original file (20090006529.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SPD code of "LBK" is the correct code for RA Soldiers released from active duty for completion of required active service under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200. The SPD code of "MBK" is the correct code for Soldiers released from active duty for completion of required active service under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200 when eligible to reenlist or Soldiers with a DCSS in force who are released from Active Duty (REFRAD) on completion of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016964

    Original file (20140016964.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows he was REFRAD under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4 by reason of completion of required active service. The SPD code of "LBK" is the correct code for RA Soldiers involuntarily REFRAD for completion of required active service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 who sign a Declination of Continued Service Statement or are ineligible for, barred from, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018452

    Original file (20130018452.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018439

    Original file (20130018439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 sets forth the basic authority for the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of a physical disability. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. However, the evidence of record shows he was determined unfit for duty in 2007.