Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026796
Original file (20100026796.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  28 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100026796 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  He states:

* He was recommended for award of the CIB but was discharged before the process was completed
* It was unfair that he never received the CIB that he earned while in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN)
* He served in the RVN from 10 September 1969 to 10 September 1970 and spent many hours in the field in combat

3.  He did not supply any supporting documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 January 1969.  He completed training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic) and 63C (General Vehicle Repairman.  On 8 June 1970, he was reclassified into MOS 11D (Armored Reconnaissance Specialist).  

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Record Brief) shows:

   a.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) – He served in the RVN from 10 September 1969 through 9 September 1970; and 
   
   b.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) - Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Squadron, 1st Calvary Regiment, from 20 September 1969 to 5 September 1970 in MOS 11E, as a Personnel Carrier Driver.

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 10 September 1970 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show award of the CIB.

6.  There are no orders in the available records that show he was awarded the CIB.  His records do not show any evidence he engaged in active ground combat while he was in the RVN.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The available evidence shows the applicant held and served in an infantry MOS in an infantry unit.  However, the evidence does not show that he engaged in active ground combat while serving with his unit.  Further, his duty MOS of 11E was not one of the MOSs eligible for award of the CIB.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x___  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x________   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026796



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007790

    Original file (20120007790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, there is no evidence of record that indicates he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB during his active duty service. Notwithstanding his sincerity and the apparent issuance of the CIB (1st Award) to him by TACOM, in the absence of official documentary evidence that conclusively shows he was personally present with a qualifying infantry unit when it was engaged in active ground...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021167

    Original file (20130021167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). On 26 June 1970, the applicant was assigned to C Troop, 3rd Cavalry Reconnaissance Squadron, 4th Cavalry Regiment, 25th Infantry Division for duty as an automotive repair parts specialist. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was not awarded an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013549

    Original file (20140013549.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence of record and he did not submit any substantive evidence that shows he was awarded the CIB or that he served in active ground combat while assigned to this unit. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to correct his military service records to show he was awarded the CIB. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012823

    Original file (20120012823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record and DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the RVN from 21 January to 16 October 1968. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009921

    Original file (20100009921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record the applicant served in active ground combat during his tour in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and as a result concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. Further, there is no indication he was ever assigned to an infantry staff headquarters or to non-infantry duties during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, and given his unit regularly participated in combat operations and was cited...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012080

    Original file (20120012080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There is no evidence in the applicant's available military service records that show he was awarded an infantry MOS or that served in an infantry unit while engaged in active ground combat. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS and that he served in an infantryman position.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001354

    Original file (20140001354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that during the Vietnam Conflict, only enlisted Soldiers who held and served in an infantry unit in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H were eligible for award of the CIB. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded the CIB. Therefore, in view of all of the foregoing, the available evidence is insufficient to support the applicant's request for correction of his records to show award of CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077141C070215

    Original file (2002077141C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, that he should be awarded the PH for wounds he received while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded or recommended for the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008438

    Original file (20100008438.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. Regrettably, in the absence of evidence of a wound received from a hostile action requiring treatment by a medical officer and such treatment was made a matter of official record, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request for award of the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009882

    Original file (20130009882.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). He also states that while his MOS was that of an 11E (Armor Crewman) he served in the same unit and performed in combat just as the infantryman did and he should be entitled to award of the CIB. Additionally, the regulation has always required a Soldier to possess an infantry MOS, not just to serve in the duty MOS of an infantryman as every Soldier is trained to do.