Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003627
Original file (20090003627.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	         27 August 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003627 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, the Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected from JFL to either JFI or JEA.

2.  The applicant states all of his “conditions and disabilities” are combat-related; therefore, his SPD Code is incorrect.

3.  The applicant provides:

	a.  a copy of DA Form 5889-R (PEB [Physical Evaluation Board] Referral Transmittal Document);

	b.  a copy of DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board [MEBD] Proceedings);

	c.  a copy of a Narrative Summary (NARSUM);

	d.  copies of miscellaneous military medical documents;

	e.  a copy of DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile) showing a permanent profile for “panic disorder without agoraphobia” and posttraumatic stress disorder”;

	f.  a copy of a memorandum from his company commander requesting the applicant’s reassignment to the Medical Processing Company, Warrior Transition Brigade; and

	g.  copies of 106 pages of Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) VISTA [Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture] Electronic Medical Documentation records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 24 May 2005.  He was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 19D (Cavalry Scout).  He served with C Troop, 4th Squadron, 7th Cavalry, 2nd Infantry Division, and he served in Iraq from 15 December 2005 - 15 December 2006.

2.  On 22 October 2007, the applicant’s Troop Commander requested his transfer to the Medical Processing Company of the Warrior Transition Brigade because of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and panic disorder which led to a permanent profile.

3.  The applicant entered the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and underwent an MEBD proceeding on 13 December 2007.  He was referred to a PEB for panic disorder and PTSD.

4.  On 14 January 2008, the applicant underwent a PEB proceeding at Fort Lewis, WA.  He was evaluated as being 10 percent disabled under DVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities Code 9411 (PTSD) and determined to be physically unfit.  It was recommended he be separated with severance pay.  On 9 April 2008, a revised PEB Proceedings was completed based upon changes to the disability rating guidance under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2008.  The end result was the same; however, the statement “The disability was incurred in a combat zone or incurred during the performance of duty in combat-related operations as designated by the Secretary of Defense (NDAA 08, Sec 1646)” was added to his DA Form 18 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings).

5.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 17 March 2008.  His DD Form 214 shows he served 2 years, 9 months, and 24 days of creditable service with
1 year, 5 months, and 4 days of foreign service.  He was paid disability severance pay in the amount of $11,093.40.  It also shows:

   a.  in Item 25 (Separation Authority), “AR [Army Regulation] 635-40 [Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation], PARA 4-24B(3)”;

	b.  in Item 26 (Separation Code), “JFL”;

	c.  in Item 27 (Reentry Code), “3”; and

	d.  in Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), “DISABILITY, SEVERANCE PAY.”

6.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (statutory or other directives), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on DD Form 214.  Table 2-3 lists every SPD code applicable to enlisted personnel.  It shows that Soldiers involuntarily discharged under the authority of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) by reason of disability with severance pay will be assigned SPD Code “JFL.”  Furthermore, Army Regulation 635-5-1 does not contain SPD Codes “JFI” or JEA.”

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his SPD Code should be changed from “JFL” to either “JFI” or JEA.”

2.  SPD Codes are assigned in accordance with Army Regulation 635-5-1 and are based on the specific regulatory separation authority.  The applicant’s SPD Code is correct, given his separation authority and narrative reason for separation.

3.  The applicant’s SPD Code has nothing to do with whether or not his disabilities are combat-related.  His DA Form 18 links his disabilities to combat per NDAA 08, Section 1646.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X     _  ____X___  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003627



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003627



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016808

    Original file (20090016808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    a. SPD code "JFI" for disability, severance pay, combat-related, is used for discharge resulting from physical disability with combat-related severance pay and entitlement. b. SPD code "JFO" for disability, severance pay, non-combat related, is used for discharge resulting from physical disability with non-combat related severance pay and entitlement. c. SPD code "JEA" for disability, severance pay, non-combat related (enhanced), is used for discharge resulting from physical disability...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024492

    Original file (20110024492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) shows his disability as combat-related and his separation orders also indicate his disability resulted from a combat-related injury. He was discharged from active duty on 16 August 2011 in the rank of SFC under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), chapter 4, by reason of disability, severance pay, non-combat (enhanced). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015363

    Original file (20100015363.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * his DD Form 214 with effective date 20080605 * Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) letter dated 19 April 2010 * his DD Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings * DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board [MEB] Proceedings) * MEB Narrative Summary (NARSUM) 4. The PEB rated him under the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and, as shown in items 8a, 8b, and 8g (Disability Description, VA Code, Percentage), he was granted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014935

    Original file (20080014935.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), be corrected to show the entry "Disability, Severance Pay, Combat Related" instead of the entry "Disability, Severance Pay, Non-Combat Related." The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably discharged, on 13 August 2008, by reason of physical disability, under the provision of Army Regulation 635-40 and IAW NDAA 2008, due...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010606

    Original file (20140010606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) * DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings) * Multiple Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * Multiple consults, sick call slips, and chronological records of medical care * Other service and civilian medical records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Although the PEB recommended his separation with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000157

    Original file (20140000157.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 April 2012, a medical evaluation board (MEB) convened at Fort Sam Houston and diagnosed him with the condition of low back strain that failed retention standards. a. SPD Code of "JFI" is appropriate when the narrative reason for discharge is disability, severance pay, combat-related, and the authority is Army Regulation 635-40, chapter 4; b. SPD Code of "JFO" is appropriate when the narrative reason for discharge is disability, severance pay, non-combat related, and the authority is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004876

    Original file (20130004876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the reason for separation should be "Disability, Severance Pay, Combat Related" not "Disability, Severance Pay, Non-Combat (Enhanced)" * his DD Form 199 (Informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) shows his disability did result from a combat-related injury 3. NDAA 2008, section 1646 (Enhancement of Disability Severance Pay) provides that no deductions may be made from severance pay of service members rated less than 30 percent disability with less than 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021590

    Original file (20090021590.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his discharge orders and item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his disability was combat related. The applicant submits Orders 331-0104, dated 26 November 2008, which state, in pertinent part, his scheduled date of separation is 1 February 2009 and under additional instructions the entries "d. Disability resulted from a combat related injury as defined in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024581

    Original file (20110024581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 10c of the proceedings shows the disability did result from a combat-related injury as defined in Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104. c. Item 10d states the disability was not incurred in a combat zone or incurred during the performance of duty in combat-related operations as designated by the Secretary of Defense in accordance with the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) 2008, section 1646. b. SPD code JFO for disability, severance pay, noncombat-related, is used for a discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001120

    Original file (20140001120.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of Defense Instruction 1332.38, subject: Physical Disability Evaluation, states a physical disability evaluation shall include a determination and supporting documentation on whether the member's physical disability compensation is excluded from Federal gross income under Title 26 USC 104. a. SPD Code of "JFI" is appropriate when the narrative reason for discharge is disability, severance pay, combat-related, and the authority is Army Regulation 635-40, chapter 4; b. SPD Code of...