Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025764
Original file (20100025764.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    9 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100025764 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3 to a more favorable RE code so he may enlist in the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG).

2.  The applicant states he had an excellent service record, but he received an RE-3 code which prevents him from joining the USCG.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for a period of 4 years on 20 March 2001 and held military occupational specialty 14T (Patriot Missile Crewmember).

3.  The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's discharge are not available for review with this case.  However, his records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he was honorably released from active duty on 1 January 2005 under the provisions of paragraph 5-16 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) to "attend school."  This form also shows he completed 3 years, 9 months, and 12 days of creditable active military service.

* Item 26 (Separation Code) shows the entry "MCF"
* Item 27 (Reentry Code) shows the entry "3"

4.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides the Army's enlisted administrative separation policy.  Paragraph 5-16 provides the policy for early separation to further education.  It states Soldiers could be discharged or released from active duty for the convenience of the government up to 90 days before their expiration of term of service in order to attend a specific term at a college, university, vocational school, or technical school.

5.  Army Regulation 601-210 (RA and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and USAR.  An RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.  They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.  An RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable.  They are ineligible unless a waiver is granted.  Recruiters are responsible for processing an applicant's request for waiver to the proper approval authority.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. 
The regulation in effect at the time identified the SPD code of "MCF" as the appropriate code to assign RA Soldiers separated early to attend school under the provisions of paragraph 5-16, Army Regulation 635-200.

7.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table provides instructions for determining the RE code for Active Army Soldiers and Reserve Component Soldiers.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table in effect at the time of the applicant's separation established an RE code of "3" as the proper RE code to assign Soldiers separated with an SPD code of "MCF."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's record confirms he was separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-16, Army Regulation 635-200, to attend school.  He was appropriately assigned an SPD code of MCF in accordance with the applicable regulation based on this authority and reason for separation.  He was assigned a corresponding RE code of 3.  His assigned RE code was and remains valid.

2.  The ABCMR does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for programs or benefits.  The applicant is advised that although no change is being recommended to his RE code, this does not mean that he is disqualified from reenlistment.  An RE code of 3 applies to persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but the disqualification is waivable.  He should contact a local recruiter who can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and is required to process a waiver of his RE code (although it is acknowledged that the USCG may have different policies concerning a requirement to process a request for waiver).

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  __X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025764



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025764



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010290

    Original file (20100010290.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her Reentry (RE) code of 3 to a more favorable RE code so she may reenter the military. The regulation in effect at the time identified the "MCF" SPD code of MCF as the appropriate code to assign Regular Army Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation 635-200, who were separated early to attend school. The SPD/RE Cross Reference Table in effect at the time of the applicant's separation established an RE code of 3 as the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004726

    Original file (20110004726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Reentry (RE) code of 3 to a 1 so he may reenter military service. The regulation in effect at the time identified the SPD code of MCF as the appropriate code to assign RA Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation 635-200, who were separated early to attend school. The SPD/RE Cross Reference Table in effect at the time of the applicant's separation established an RE code of 3 as the proper RE code to assign Soldiers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015900

    Original file (20100015900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. The SPD/RE Cross Reference Table in effect at the time of the applicant's separation established an RE code of 3 as the proper RE code to assign Soldiers separated with an SPD code of MCF. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated early under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-16, to attend school.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003251

    Original file (20130003251.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 22 October 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130003251 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * his separation code and RE code are wrong on his DD Form 214 and do not allow him to return to active duty * he will need a waiver to return to active duty * he separated with an honorable discharge to attend a civilian school and should not need a waiver to reenter the Armed Forces 3. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007209C070208

    Original file (20040007209C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Linda D. Simmons | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides a DA Form 4187, dated 17 April 2002, which shows he requested a 90 day early separation to attend school. The regulation in effect at the time identified the SPD code of MCF as the appropriate code to assign RA Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 5- 17, Army Regulation 635-200, who were separated early to attend school.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016159

    Original file (20090016159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table in effect at the time provided for assigning an RE-3 code to members separated under these provisions with an SPD code of MCF. By regulation, members separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation 635-200, in order to attend school are assigned an SPD code of MCF and a corresponding RE code of 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001555

    Original file (20110001555.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, the evidence of record further shows the narrative reason for separation and the assigned SPD and RE codes are correct based on his early release to attend school.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018772

    Original file (20090018772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his reentry eligibility (RE) code from an RE-3 to an RE-1 so he may reenter military service. Army Regulation 601-210 (RA and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the U.S. Army Reserve. The "MCF" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-17.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004120

    Original file (20110004120 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory or other directives), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on DD Form 214. The applicant was properly given an RE 3 when he declined to continue on active duty by requesting an early separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086795C070212

    Original file (2003086795C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In...