Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086795C070212
Original file (2003086795C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 20 May 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003086795

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Chairperson
Ms. Deborah Jacobs Member
Mr. Jose A. Martinez Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the reentry (RE) code of RE-3 he was assigned upon his separation from active duty on 21 January 2000 be changed to an RE-1 code.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that the RE-3 code he was assigned should be an RE-1 code.

COUNSEL CONTENDS: In effect, that the applicant feels a mistake was made on his separation document (DD Form 214) and would like to have it corrected. Counsel feels that the RE-3 code listed should be an RE-1 code. Counsel further indicates that the applicant is currently serving in the Army National Guard (ARNG) and would like to transfer to the Air National Guard; however, they will not accept him because of the RE-3 code. The applicant is a helicopter mechanic and feels he can be best utilized in the Air Guard.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 1 August 1996, he entered active duty in the Regular Army. He continuously served on active duty for 3 years, 5 months, and 21 days until 21 January 2000, at which time he was honorably separated.

The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation confirms that the authority for his separation was paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation
635-200, and the reason for his separation was to attend school. This document also confirms that he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of MCF and an RE code of RE-3. The applicant authenticated this document with his signature in Item 21 (Signature of Member Being Separated), thereby verifying that the information contained in the DD Form 214, to include the RE-3 code, was correct at the time the document was prepared and issued.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 5 policies concerning separation for the convenience of the Government. Paragraph 5-17, in effect at the time, provided for the early separation of soldiers to further their education. It allowed soldiers to be separated from active duty for the convenience of the Government, in order to attend a specific term at college, university, vocational school, or technical school.


Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes. RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.

Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The SPD code of MCF was the appropriate code for the applicant based on the guidance provided in this regulation for soldiers separating under the provisions of chapter 5, Army Regulation 635-200, in order to attend school. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table establishes RE-3 as the proper reentry code to assign to soldiers separated under this authority and for this reason.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes the contention of the applicant and his counsel that there was a mistake made in his RE code, and that it should be changed from RE-3 to RE-1. However, the Board finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2. By regulation, soldiers separated early to attend school are assigned a SPD code of MCF and a corresponding RE code of RE-3. RE-3 indicates that the soldier requires a waiver in order to reenlist. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was properly given an RE-3 code as a result of the SPD code he received based on the authority and reason for his discharge in accordance with the applicable regulation. It also appears that the applicant was or should have been aware of the basis for the RE-3 code assignment at the time of his separation, as evidenced by his signature on the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time.

3. Lacking independent evidence to the contrary, the Board is satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5. The Board is not familiar with Air National Guard reenlistment policies, but it is clear the applicant was assigned the RE-3 code based on his early separation to attend school, and not as a result of any disciplinary history. Under Army enlistment policy, he would be allowed to request a waiver for reenlistment. The applicant is advised to discuss waiver policies with Air National Guard enlistment personnel to determine his eligibility to obtain a waiver for enlistment in that service.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

         DJ__ __MM___ __JM_ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003086795
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/05/20
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 2000/01/21
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200 C5
DISCHARGE REASON Attend School
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 4 100.0300
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008187

    Original file (20120008187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests amendment of his reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3 to an RE code of 1. According to the SPD/RE Code Cross-Reference Table, the appropriate RE code for the SPD code of "MCF" is an RE code of 3. These individuals can best advise a former service member of the needs of the military at the time and may process enlistment waivers for the applicant's RE code.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000927C070206

    Original file (20050000927C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000927C070206

    Original file (20050000927C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete military record is not available and does not contain his discharge processing documents. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003251

    Original file (20130003251.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 22 October 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130003251 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * his separation code and RE code are wrong on his DD Form 214 and do not allow him to return to active duty * he will need a waiver to return to active duty * he separated with an honorable discharge to attend a civilian school and should not need a waiver to reenter the Armed Forces 3. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007209C070208

    Original file (20040007209C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Linda D. Simmons | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides a DA Form 4187, dated 17 April 2002, which shows he requested a 90 day early separation to attend school. The regulation in effect at the time identified the SPD code of MCF as the appropriate code to assign RA Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 5- 17, Army Regulation 635-200, who were separated early to attend school.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025764

    Original file (20100025764.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3 to a more favorable RE code so he may enlist in the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG). The regulation in effect at the time identified the SPD code of "MCF" as the appropriate code to assign RA Soldiers separated early to attend school under the provisions of paragraph 5-16, Army Regulation 635-200. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021456

    Original file (20130021456.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, the following: * correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Ranger Tab * a change to his reentry eligibility (RE) code 2. The regulation states the SPD code of MCF will be used for the voluntary release from active duty to attend civilian school under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-16. It also shows SPD codes with their corresponding RE code.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000085

    Original file (20140000085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the entries in the following items on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * item 25 (Separation Authority) * item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) 2. On 25 November 1997, the separation authority approved the applicant's release from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17. The evidence shows he was released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635–200, paragraph 5-17 at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004726

    Original file (20110004726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Reentry (RE) code of 3 to a 1 so he may reenter military service. The regulation in effect at the time identified the SPD code of MCF as the appropriate code to assign RA Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation 635-200, who were separated early to attend school. The SPD/RE Cross Reference Table in effect at the time of the applicant's separation established an RE code of 3 as the proper RE code to assign Soldiers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003398

    Original file (20130003398.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with his 25 October 2010 request he was released from active duty early to attend a civilian school. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It shows SPD code "MCF" is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-16, to...