Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024900
Original file (20100024900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024900


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the effective date of transfer of her Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits be corrected to show the action was completed on 15 October 2009 or, in the alternative, 24 November 2009.

2.  The applicant states:

   a.  The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008, effective on 1 August 2009, was confusing as it pertains to transferability rules.  She applied for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) educational benefits on 11 August 2009 via VONAPP (Veterans On Line Applications).  The VA approved her application on 15 October 2009, so given she had to serve 2 more years of active service from the date of transfer she assumed she would be eligible to retire in October 2011.

   b.  She was "uncomfortable with the lack of definitive information" about her registration for the Post-9/11 GI Bill program.  She made inquiries, but she did not find any information alluding to the fact the date of transfer of benefits, which is the trigger for the start date of her additional service obligation of 2 years required her to delineate the actual number of months of educational benefits she intended to transfer to each of her dependents.  On 24 November 2009, she logged-on to the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) website and verified her sons were listed as eligible dependents with acknowledgment of transferability of education benefits.

   c.  In July 2010, her supervisor, who also had registered for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, advised her that they had not accomplished all of the steps required to complete the application.  Specifically, he said they had to designate the number of months of education benefits each dependent would receive.  On 22 July 2010, she again logged-on to the DMDC website and within 90 seconds had completed the "transfer request" portion of the process.  Now her 2-year obligation started on 22 July 2010 and expires on 21 July 2012.

   d.  In effect, she is being forced to serve an additional 9 months of active service because the transferability instructions for the Post-9/11 GI Bill were unclear.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a 3-page statement
* a timeline
* attachments A-K consisting of:

* VONAPP
* 19 August 2009 VA letter acknowledging receipt of application
* 15 October 2009 VA certificate of eligibility letter
* 5 January 2009 U.S. Army Legal Services Agency (USALSA) email with information paper on Post-9/11 GI Bill
* Army Public Affairs article "Soldiers' Newest GI Bill exceeds tuition assistance, also benefits dependents"
* DoD Directive Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003
* VA article "Transfer of Post-9/11GI Bill Benefits to Dependents (TEB)"
* VA website "Post-9/11 GI Bill – It's Your Future"
* 2-page DMDC document dated 24 November 2009
* DoD DMDC letter, dated 2 September 2010, approving transfer of education benefits to applicant's 3 sons, with each receiving 12 months
* timeline

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is a Regular Army (RA) Lieutenant Colonel, Judge Advocate General's Corps.  She entered an active duty status in January 1991; as of 
1 August 2009, she had 18, but less than 19 years of service.  She is enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill.




2.  The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 (Public Law 
110-252 – Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2008) was enacted on 30 June 2008 and went into effect on 1 August 2009; it provides for the transfer of education benefits to dependents.  Based on the law, the applicant is required to serve 2 years of service from the date her request was submitted.  The applicant filed her enrollment on 11 August 2009, and received acknowledgment from the VA on 19 August 2009 and approval on 15 October 2009.

3.  The applicant was determined to have the full 36 months of unused education benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill.  She listed her three sons as beneficiaries for the transfer of those 36 months of benefits; however, she did not designate the number of months that each son was to receive until 22 July 2010.  There-fore, her submission was not complete until 22 July 2010.

4.  DTM 09-003 (Post-9/11 GI Bill), dated 22 June 2009, provides the following in Attachment 2, page 17, paragraph 3f (Designation of Transferee):

An individual transferring an entitlement to educational assistance under this section shall, through notification to the Secretary of the Military Department concerned, as specified in paragraph 3.i. of this attachment:

(1) Designate the dependent or dependents to whom such entitlement is being transferred. 

(2) Designate the number of months of such entitlement to be transferred to each dependent. 

(3) Specify the period for which the transfer shall be effective for each dependent.

5.  The 5 January 2009 USALSA information paper provided by the applicant states, "If the participant is a member of the Armed Forces on 1 August 2009, the Department of Defense (DoD) may offer the opportunity to transfer benefits to spouses, dependent children, or a combination thereof [emphasis added].







6. On 10 July 2009, the Army G1 published the "Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Policy Quick Reference Guide."  This guide states, in pertinent part:

Submitting a Request to Transfer Benefits

(1)  Using CAC card or DFAS pin, log on to the DoD Transferability of Education Benefits (TEB) web page located at https//www.dmdc.osd.mil/TEB/

(2)  and 3.  Omitted

(3)  To transfer benefits to an eligible dependent, click the edit button on their name line.  (If the dependent name is grayed out or the edit button does not work, it means that dependent is not eligible for DEERS benefits and thus is not eligible to receive transferred benefits):

   a.  List the number of months of benefits to transfer to that dependent.

   b.  Select the start date you want the dependent to be able to use transferred benefits.  You can use either the calendar on the page or type in the start date. Format for date is YYYY-MM-DD.

   c.  Select the end date after which your dependent can no longer use transferred benefits.  Select this date carefully.  After this date the VA will not pay benefits to a dependent even if the dependent has months of benefits remaining.  When selecting this date consider that a spouse can use benefits up to 15 years after you leave active duty and that children can use the benefits up to their twenty-sixth birthday.

   d.  After you are filled in [sic] the number of months to transfer to the dependent and selected the start and end dates, hit the save button.

   e.  After the request is submitted, the TEB site will return to the original page with all your eligible dependents.  To transfer benefits to another dependent, repeat the above steps.  Remember the total months you can transfer to your dependents can be no more than 
36 months or the number of months of Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to which you are entitled, whichever is less.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests the effective date of transfer of her Post-9/11 
GI Bill education benefits be corrected to show the action was completed on 
15 October or 24 November 2009.  She makes this request so that she may retire on 31 October or 30 November 2011.

2.  The applicant initiated the Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer process in August 2009.  She believed she had completed the process on 15 October 2009 or, at the latest, on 24 November 2009.  However, she did not properly complete her transfer of benefits to her three eligible dependent sons because she failed to list the number of months of benefits to be transferred to each child until 22 July 2010.

3.  By law, the applicant, who had 18 years of service in 2009, is required to serve 2 years of service from 22 July 2010 in order to be eligible for retirement.  Based on completion of the transferability date of 22 July 2010, the applicant is required to serve through July 2012, making her eligible to retire on 31 July 2012.

4.  The applicant's argument that transferability rules were confusing is not persuasive.  The Army G1 put out clear guidance on 10 July 2009 concerning how to submit a request for transfer of benefits.  The information was available when the applicant first went on-line to submit her application.  Even if she had not seen the G1 guidance, other documents, like DTN 09-003, contained the same information.

5.  The available evidence is insufficient to support the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024900



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024900



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017790

    Original file (20130017790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Wards of states are not eligible to receive transferred benefits. The VA cannot establish eligibility for TEB benefits until DoD approves the service member's request to transfer benefits. The applicant contends that her records should be corrected to allow her to transfer her educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to her ward.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140020958

    Original file (AR20140020958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show her request to transfer her education benefits to her eligible dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill was approved. The applicant provides: * Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-1, Director of Military Personnel Management (DMPM), denial of applicant's request for a TEB exception to policy * information paper * emails * website screen printout of her TEB request * excerpts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04229

    Original file (BC-2010-04229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was never informed her benefits had to be transferred prior to her retirement in November 2009. The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates she was unable to transfer her benefits because the TEB system did not recognize her family members and there was no one to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008282

    Original file (20120008282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service; and d. for those individuals who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010, no additional service is required. There is insufficient evidence that shows the applicant submitted a request to transfer educational benefits to her family members while in an active status. The applicant contends that she is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015264

    Original file (20130015264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application. f. A child may use the benefit while the eligible individual remains in the Armed Forces or after separation from active duty after completing the additional service required to transfer the educational assistance under the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Therefore, he is not eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his daughter.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008021

    Original file (20120008021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was uninformed that education benefits must be transferred to dependents before they reached 23 years of age * his oldest child, his daughter Natasha, reached 23 years of age on 13 January 2012 * he attempted to transfer his benefits to her on 12 April 2012 * Natasha was displayed on the Post-9/11 GI Bill website, yet labeled ineligible * information on the Post-9/11 GI Bill website states dependents can use transferred benefits between 18 and 26 years of age * he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021380

    Original file (20130021380.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130021380 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Eligible individuals include members of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of their request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, are eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: b. have at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agree to serve 4 additional years in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01784

    Original file (BC-2011-01784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant does not provide any evidence that he submitted an application on or about 16 January 2011. The A1PA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states his spouse decided to further her education and he would like to transfer his benefits to his spouse. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003219

    Original file (20150003219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * her husband is active duty and she is a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * both she and her husband took action to transfer education benefits to their children; however, she does not have a copy of the documentation she submitted * their daughter used education benefits transferred by her husband, as did their son (he is currently using those benefits) * she and her husband recognized her husband's benefits would be exhausted before...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02518

    Original file (BC 2013 02518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While on active duty he followed the instructions to request Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB); however, there is no record of the transaction. The applicant states all requirements for TEB were completed; however, he went through VONAPP. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02518 in Executive...