Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024859
Original file (20100024859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024859 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his reentry eligibility (RE) code to a code that will allow him to reenlist.

2.  The applicant states he was young when he was in the Army and he made some mistakes.

3.  The applicant provides a letter from the North Carolina Department of Administration, dated 29 September 2010.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 June 2006.  He completed training as an infantryman.
3.  On 16 January 2007, the applicant was counseled for wrongful use of a controlled substance.  According to the information contained on the DA Form 4856 (Developmental Counseling Form), it was his second offense of testing positive for cocaine.  During counseling, he was advised of his rights and told that he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 14-12c, for patterns of misconduct – commission of a serious offense.

4.  He was counseled on 17 January 2007 for:

* Underage drinking
* Assault
* Absence without leave (AWOL)

5.  Nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant on 2 February 2007 for wrongful use of cocaine on two separate occasions and underage drinking.

6.  On 26 March 2007, the applicant was notified that he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c for misconduct – commission of a serious offense.  His commander cited wrongful use of drugs and underage drinking as the basis for his recommendation.  He acknowledged receipt of the notification.  After consulting with counsel, he elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.

7.  The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge on 10 April 2007 and he directed the issuance of a general discharge certificate.  On 20 April 2007, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c(2), for misconduct – drug abuse.  

8.  The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows he had completed 11 months and 8 day of net active service this period.  He was issued an RE code of 4 and a JKK (misconduct) separation program designator (SPD).

10.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Chapter 3 prescribes basic eligibility for prior-service applicants for enlistment and includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes.  RE code 4 applies to persons who have a non-waivable disqualification.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives) and reasons for the separation of members from active military service and the SPD code to be used for these stated reasons.

12.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table provides instructions for determining the RE code for Regular Army Soldiers and Reserve Component Soldiers.  SPD code JKK has a corresponding RE code of 4.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.  However, there is no error or injustice in his assigned RE code.

2.  His records show he was discharged for misconduct – drug abuse.  He was assigned an RE code 4 and a JKK SPD code based on his reason for discharge.

3.  As previously stated, an RE code of 4 applies to persons who are not considered qualified for reentry or continuous service.  The fact that he desires to reenlist in the Army is not a sufficient justification for changing his RE code 4.

4.  In view of the foregoing, his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 





are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024859



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024859



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008232

    Original file (20090008232.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 601-280 (Army Retention Program) states that the RE codes contained on military discharge documents determine whether or not one may reenlist in a military service at a later time. Not only did the applicant illegally use cocaine in the barracks, he did it while being absent from his place of duty. Furthermore, in addition to drug abuse being eligible for a bar to reenlistment, he was discharged in pay grade E-1 which also requires an RE-4 and precludes his reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017105

    Original file (20130017105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 October 2005, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), by reason of "Misconduct, Abuse of Illegal Drugs," with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge, a separation (SPD) code of JKK and an RE code of 4. On 27 July 2011, the Army Discharge Review Board, after careful consideration of his military records and all other available evidence, determined he was properly and equitably discharged and denied his request for an upgrade of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019605

    Original file (20090019605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 23 May 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct (drug abuse) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022218

    Original file (20110022218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 2007, the applicant was discharged accordingly. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate for a Soldier discharged for patterns of misconduct; however, the discharge authority may direct an honorable or general discharge if such are merited by the Soldier's overall record. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018124

    Original file (20110018124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 2007, the applicant was discharged accordingly. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate for a Soldier discharged for patterns of misconduct; however, the discharge authority may direct an honorable or general discharge if such are merited by the Soldier's overall record. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012830

    Original file (20110012830.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 February 2007, the separation authority approved his discharge action under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, with the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. His re-issued DD Form 214 shows he was discharged by reason of misconduct (drug abuse) in the rank/grade of PV1/E-1 on 2 March 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, with a character of service of under honorable conditions (general). The evidence of record also...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004854

    Original file (20090004854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 7 March 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), based on the unit urinalysis that showed he tested positive for cocaine. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020011

    Original file (20090020011.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 January 2008, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Separations), paragraph 14-12c, for commission of a serious offense (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Army Regulation 635-200 further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021350

    Original file (20090021350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge and change of his reentry eligibility (RE) code to one which would allow him to reenter the Army. The applicant's platoon sergeant told him that he was recommending nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000673

    Original file (20110000673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 August 2009, the applicant's commander initiated action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct (drug abuse). The SPD code of JKK was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14, misconduct (drug abuse). The applicant requests that his RE code of 4 be changed to an RE code of 2 so that he may...