IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 13 April 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090019605
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that the Reentry (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed.
2. The applicant states that he received a general, under honorable conditions discharge after failing one drug test and without any counseling attempts. He adds that he feels the RE code of "4" is unjust considering the failed drug test was after Christmas Exodus from Advanced Individual Training. The applicant maintains that he wants to serve his country and the Army again and be a better Soldier than he was before.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ [Uniform Code of Military Justice].
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicants record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on
15 June 2006.
2. On 16 March 2007, nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, was imposed against the applicant for wrongful use of cocaine between 4 December 2006 and 4 January 2007. His punishment consisted of reduction to the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E1, forfeiture of $650.00 pay per month for 2 months (suspended), and restriction and extra duty for 45 days.
3. On 26 April 2007, the applicants unit commander notified him of the intent to recommend that he be separated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c, by reason of commission of a serious offense (wrongful use of cocaine). The commander recommended that any further requirements for counseling and rehabilitation be waived based on his belief that further duty of the Soldier would:
a. create serious disciplinary problems or a hazard to the military mission or to the Soldier,
b. be inappropriate because Soldier is resisting rehabilitation attempts, and
c. rehabilitation would not be in the best interest of the Army as it would not produce a quality Soldier.
4. On 26 April 2007, the applicant consulted with military counsel. After being advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action, its effects and the rights available to him, the applicant waived consideration of his case by an administrative board, personal appearance, and his right to be represented by counsel. The applicant acknowledged that he may encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life if a general discharge under honorable conditions was issued. He further acknowledged that if he received a discharge certificate/
character of service that is less than honorable, he may make an application to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) or to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) for an upgrade of his discharge. He acknowledged that he understood an act of consideration by either board did not imply that his discharge would be upgraded. The applicant also acknowledged he understood that he would be ineligible to apply for enlistment in the U.S. Army for a period of 2 years after discharge.
5. On 1 May 2007, the separation authority approved the recommendation for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c. The separation authority directed that the applicant be issued a General, Under Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate.
6. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 23 May 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct (drug abuse) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
He was credited with completing 11 months and 9 days of active service.
Item 26 (Separation Code) shows he was assigned a code of "JKK" and item 27 shows his RE code as "4."
7. Army Regulation 635- 200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14-12 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for acts or patterns of misconduct. Paragraph 14-12c states that specific categories of commission of a serious military or civil offense include abuse of illegal drugs. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.
8. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code JKK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, by reason of misconduct (drug abuse). The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE-4 code will be assigned to members separated under these provisions with an SPD code of JKK.
9. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes:
a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.
b. RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable. They are ineligible unless a waiver is granted.
c. RE-4 applies to Soldiers who are separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification. They are ineligible for enlistment.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that he was discharged after failing one drug test without any counseling attempts. The regulation as cited above states that action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed. The commander recommended that further requirements for counseling and rehabilitation attempts be waived due to the applicant creating disciplinary problems, resistance to rehabilitation attempts, and rehabilitation would not produce a quality Soldier.
2. The available evidence shows the applicant was separated due to drug abuse. Therefore, he was assigned an RE code of 4 which is consistent with the reason for separation. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that his assigned RE code is in error or unjust.
3. The evidence of record also confirms the applicants discharge processing was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations and the both the narrative reason for separation and the characterization of service are appropriate considering all the facts of the case.
4. Absent any evidence of error or injustice in the discharge process, the assigned RE code is proper and equitable based on the authority and reason for discharge. As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support a change of the RE code.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x____ ____x____ ____x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________x___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090019605
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090019605
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022175
Army Regulation 635-200 further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. It states, in pertinent part, that SPD code JKK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c, by reason of misconduct - drug abuse. He has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022453
e. On 20 April 2007, a telephone conference with his commander and supervisor revealed that in addition to using illegal drugs, he had also continued to drink to intoxication while enrolled in ASAP. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general discharge under honorable conditions. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016553
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribed the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD codes to be used for these stated reasons. Pertinent Army regulations provide that, prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000929
He submitted a request to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) and was granted an upgrade of the characterization of his service from general under honorable conditions to fully honorable. His initial DD Form 214 shows: * his service was characterized as under honorable conditions (general) * he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) with a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JKK and an RE code of 4 * his narrative reason for separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006583
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 30 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c (2), Army Regulation 635-200 with a general discharge (GD), based on the wrongful use of marijuana, a controlled substance. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021420
On 4 September 2008, the separation authority approved the unit commander's request and directed that the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), with a general discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, provided the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018903
The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK." Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023575
It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code JKK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), by reason of misconduct (drug abuse). His record shows he accepted nonjudicial punishment for wrongfully using cocaine and his reason for separation was misconduct (drug abuse). As such, evidence shows he was properly discharged and his separation code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003333
On 15 April 2008, the applicant was informed of his unit commander's intent to process him for separation under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs). However, by regulation, the RE-4 code assigned to the applicant was the proper code to assign members separating under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12c for misconduct (Drug Abuse). _______...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021350
The applicant requests upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge and change of his reentry eligibility (RE) code to one which would allow him to reenter the Army. The applicant's platoon sergeant told him that he was recommending nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter...