Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024792
Original file (20100024792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    14 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024792 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states:

* he was a M60 gunner in Vietnam with the 58th Infantry
* his military occupational specialty (MOS) was 11B (light weapons infantryman)
* he was in a combat zone and fired his M60 at the Vietcong on several occasions  

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 
22 December 1965.  He was awarded MOS 11B.  He served in MOS 11B assigned to Company D, 58th Infantry in Vietnam from 14 November 1966 until approximately 8 November 1967.  On 8 November 1967, he was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.

3.  His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award.

4.  There are no orders for the CIB in the available records.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the CIB.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

He held an infantry MOS and served in an infantry MOS while assigned to an infantry company in Vietnam; however, there are no orders for the CIB available.  In addition, no evidence shows he served in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size in Vietnam.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  __X____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024792





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024792



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011852

    Original file (20100011852.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) states that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed infantry training and was awarded MOS 11C. Army Regulation 600-8-22 governing award of the CIB requires service in an infantry duty position in an infantry unit engaged in active ground combat with the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001702

    Original file (20150001702.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). On 31 August 1961, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 6 years. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 9 November 1966 to 17 May 1967 as a light weapons infantryman while assigned for duty with Company D, 58th Infantry Regiment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002760

    Original file (20130002760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and "Wings" (correctly known as the Aircraft Crew Member Badge during the Vietnam era and currently known as the Aviation Badge); and b. the issuance of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and Vietnam Service Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. There is no evidence of record which shows he served in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001071

    Original file (20100001071.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant held an infantry MOS and served in an infantry MOS while assigned to infantry companies in Vietnam; however, there are no orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge available. In addition, there is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence which shows he served in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size in Vietnam. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001476

    Original file (20120001476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows multiple awards but does not show award of the CIB. However, the evidence of record shows he held a logistics MOS and served with his cavalry unit as a supply specialist/sergeant. Regretfully, in the absence of conclusive evidence that the applicant held an infantry MOS, was assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, and actively participated in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016540

    Original file (20070016540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant contends, in effect, that his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge should be reconsidered because he held MOS 11B as his secondary MOS, served in duty MOS 11B, and also served in combat situations during his second tour in the RVN. There are no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006782

    Original file (20080006782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record that showed the applicant served in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, and as a result, concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. Further, the evidence provided by the applicant places him with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces in the RVN. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014043

    Original file (20090014043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There are no orders in the applicant's reconstructed records that show he was awarded the CIB. In the absence of evidence that the applicant held an infantry MOS and was an active participant in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002093

    Original file (20120002093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007126

    Original file (20120007126.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Combat service or campaign credit alone is not sufficient to award the CIB. There is insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB in this case.