Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001702
Original file (20150001702.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  18 August 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150001702 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

	a.  he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 1966 to 1967 with Company D, 58th Infantry Regiment; and

	b.  he was involved with combat operations, thereby fulfilling the requirements to qualify for the CIB.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods ending 30 August 1961 and 30 August 1967.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 November 1959.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 111.07 (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  On 30 August 1961, he was honorably discharged for immediate enlistment in the Regular Army.  He completed 1 year, 9 months, and 7 days of total active service.  The DD Form 214 issued at that time only lists his award of the Parachutist Badge.

4.  On 31 August 1961, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 6 years.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 9 November 1966 to 17 May 1967 as a light weapons infantryman while assigned for duty with Company D, 58th Infantry Regiment.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not list the CIB.  The applicant’s records do not include any documents or orders to show he was recommended for or awarded the CIB.

6.  On 30 August 1967, the applicant was honorably discharged at the expiration of his term of service.  He completed 7 years, 9 months, and 7 days of total active duty service.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award)
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal 
* Senior Parachutist Badge
* RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1)
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun (M-60) and Rifle (M-16) Bars
* overseas service bar

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal orders for the CIB pertaining to the applicant.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards.  The CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.

9.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided the command's awards policy.  Appendix V provided guidance for award of the CIB and stated that a rifle squad or cavalry platoon satisfied the infantry-type unit of regimental size or smaller requirement for award of the CIB.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show award of the CIB.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows he was awarded an infantry MOS and he was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size in the RVN.  However, it does not sufficiently show he ever engaged in active ground combat with his infantry unit during his service in the RVN from 9 November 1966 to 17 May 1967.

3.  In view of the aforementioned evidence, there is an insufficient basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  __X__  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001702





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001702



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007986

    Original file (20140007986.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Master Parachutist Badge and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) (2nd Award). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 June 1968 the VSM and the BSM; and b. adding to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 June 1968 – * Master...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010121

    Original file (20140010121.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Parachutist Badge and the CIB for his combat service in the RVN. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size while assigned in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011071

    Original file (20090011071.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant served in the RVN from 14 May 1966 through 13 August 1967. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 21 September 1964 through 14 August 1967 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004453

    Original file (20140004453.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010888

    Original file (20140010888.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A letter of support, signed by the same individual who recommended the applicant's reassignment in the RVN, states that the applicant served in his command as a squad leader. The author states the applicant earned the CIB for his service in the RVN. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010106C071029

    Original file (20060010106C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. However, there are no orders, or other documents on file that show he was ever recommended for, or awarded either the CIB or CMB while he was serving on active duty. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s combat service in the RVN; however, combat service alone does not support award of the CMB or CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006782

    Original file (20080006782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record that showed the applicant served in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, and as a result, concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. Further, the evidence provided by the applicant places him with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces in the RVN. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016540

    Original file (20070016540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant contends, in effect, that his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge should be reconsidered because he held MOS 11B as his secondary MOS, served in duty MOS 11B, and also served in combat situations during his second tour in the RVN. There are no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020156

    Original file (20120020156.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded or authorized the following: * Purple Heart (PH) (2nd Award) * gold star on Parachute Wings for jumps under fire (properly known as the bronze service star to be worn on the Parachutist Badge to denote a combat parachute jump) * senior Parachute Wings (properly known as Senior Parachutist Badge) * Air Medal (AM) * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006687C070208

    Original file (040006687C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and must actively participate in such ground combat. One of the applicant’s efficiency reports indicate that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, although there is no evidence to show that award.