Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024426
Original file (20100024426.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024426 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, his rank be reinstated to sergeant/pay grade E-5.

2.  The applicant states:

* he was granted a discharge upgrade in September 1994
* his rank was not reinstated to pay grade E-5 once his discharge was upgraded

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 September 1979.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 94B (food service specialist).  He remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted to sergeant/pay grade E-5 on 8 February 1983 and held that grade until 10 December 1984 when he was reduced to specialist four/pay grade E-4 due to misconduct.

3.  He was again promoted to sergeant/pay grade E-5 on 28 December 1987.  On 8 January 1988, it was discovered he did not meet the general education development requirements for E-5.  His promotion to E-5 was revoked.

4.  He reenlisted on 5 May 1988 for a period of 4 years in pay grade E-4.  He held pay grade E-4 from 5 May 1988 to 24 May 1989.

5.  He received nonjudicial punishment on:

* 25 May 1989 for being absent without leave and was reduced to pay grade E-3
* 25 July 1989 for failure to go and was reduced to pay grade E-2

6.  On 20 March 1990, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions for misconduct (pattern of misconduct).  On 8 July 1994, the Army Discharge Review Board upgraded his discharge to a general discharge.

7.  Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows the entry "PV2" [private two].  Item 4b (Pay Grade) shows the entry "E2."

8.  No evidence shows he was promoted to sergeant/pay grade E-5 again prior to his discharge on 20 March 1990.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He contends his rank was not reinstated to pay grade E-5 once his discharge was upgraded in 1994.

2.  The evidence shows he was promoted to sergeant/pay grade E-5 in 1983, but he was reduced in rank due to misconduct.  He was again promoted to sergeant/pay grade E-5 in 1987, but his promotion orders were revoked because he did not meet educational requirements.  He was subsequently reduced to pay grade E-2 prior to his discharge.

3.  Since no evidence shows he was promoted to sergeant/pay grade E-5 again prior to his discharge on 20 March 1990, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024426



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024426



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011564

    Original file (20140011564.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 June 1994, he was honorably discharged in the rank/pay grade of private/E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service. The evidence shows he accepted NJP on two occasions for being AWOL and he was reduced in pay grade from E-4 to E-1. His records are void of and he failed to provide evidence showing he was promoted to specialist/E-4 following his reduction to private/E-1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006072

    Original file (20120006072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (2) Army Regulation 15-80, paragraph 2-5 states "one specific act of misconduct may or may not form the basis for a determination that the overall service in that grade was unsatisfactory, regardless of the period of time service in grade." He provided the following documents which indicate he was serving in the rank of SFC/E-7: a. award certificate, dated 30 September 1987, awarding him the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious service from 11 August 1987 to 24 August 1987; b. award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001605

    Original file (20150001605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). He was promoted to SFC in MOS 35W (Electronic Warfare Signal Intelligence Specialist) on 31 December 1999 and there was no second phase at that time period for MOS 35W. The applicant provides: * promotion and reduction orders * Enlisted Record Brief * certificate of training and completion of Phase I ANCOC diploma * USAR Discharge Orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002660

    Original file (20090002660.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show proof of his promotion to sergeant/pay grade E-5, all of his medals and awards, his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) units, and his units in the Republic of Vietnam. On 14 July 1988, the commander of the 341st Medical Group, Seagoville, TX, returned the applicant's request to his unit commander stating the request was incomplete and required a separate letter from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009644

    Original file (20090009644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the discharge orders and corresponding DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) for his 4 September 1996 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) to show his rank/grade as staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 instead of private (PV1)/pay grade E-1. The applicant provides copies of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), two promotion orders, two DD Forms 256A, four ANCOC course completion documents, and orders for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007300

    Original file (20140007300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by showing he was considered for and promoted to master sergeant, pay grade E-8 and to sergeant major, pay grade E-9. On 30 September 1988, orders were published announcing the applicant's promotion to sergeant first class, pay grade E-7 effective 1 November 1988, with a date of rank of 5 October 1988. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected by showing he was considered for and promoted to master...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015368

    Original file (20140015368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a new issue, he requests the issuance of a DD Form 214 for his Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Advanced Camp service in 1988 and that this DD Form 214 show his pay grade as E-5. Regarding the correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 May 1991 to show his pay grade as E-5, the evidence of record, as well as that provided by the applicant, does not support the granting of this request. c. As further evidence he no longer held the pay grade of E-5 after disenrollment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018467

    Original file (20140018467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As new issues, he further requests: a. in effect, an upgrade of his general discharge under honorable conditions to honorable and b. correction of item 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Since the applicant did not provide any new evidence pertaining to his request for retroactive pay and allowances based on his discharge upgrade to general under honorable conditions with reinstatement of his rank/pay grade to private/ E-2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506078C070209

    Original file (9506078C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that he was illegally denied reenlistment which was later corrected by his being authorized an antedated reenlistment. In support of his application he submits a letter from his commander who confirms that the applicant was occupying an E-8 position, that he had forwarded promotion packets for the applicant, and that the applicant was separated under the QMP without being issued a 20 year letter. The USARC recommended that the Board validate the revocation of his 1986 discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005461

    Original file (20090005461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states there was a push to control failures of the Noncommissioned Officer Education System (NCOES) candidates by requiring Soldiers to pass the Army physical fitness test (APFT) at the unit. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), in effect at the time, stated that effective 1 October 1993, the Army linked NCOES to promotion to SSG, SFC, master sergeant (MSG) and sergeant major (SGM). The applicant accepted the promotion with the condition and...