Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001605
Original file (20150001605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150001605 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). 

2.  The applicant states he has addressed this issue numerous times with the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC).  When he entered active duty in 2007, he had to relinquish a pay grade to enter active duty.  His promotion orders to SFC were revoked because he was told he had not completed the second phase of his military occupational specialty (MOS) Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course (ANCOC), at the time 91B (Medical Specialist).  He was promoted to SFC in MOS 35W (Electronic Warfare Signal Intelligence Specialist) on 31 December 1999 and there was no second phase at that time period for MOS 35W.  The MOS school had already verified that there wasn't a phase II for 35W.

3.  The applicant provides:

* promotion and reduction orders
* Enlisted Record Brief
* certificate of training and completion of Phase I ANCOC diploma
* USAR Discharge Orders

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 September 1977.  He was honorably discharged from active duty in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 14 July 1987.
2.  He enlisted in the Army National Guard on 21 December 1987 and transferred to the USAR on 21 December 1988.  He reenlisted in the USAR on 24 September 1989 and again on 9 July 1995.  He was promoted to staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 in the USAR on 7 January 1993.  

3.  On 31 December 1999, Headquarters, 70th Regional Support Command published Orders 99-365-006 promoting him to SFC/E-7 effective 31 December 1999 and awarding him primary MOS 35W.  The promotion orders stipulated that promotion is contingent on enrollment in the next level of NCO Education System within 12 months and completion within 24 months from the effective date of promotion.  

4.  On 8 November 2000, Headquarters, 70th Regional Support Command published Orders 00-313-68 reducing him to SSG/E-6 effective 8 November 2000 with a date of rank as 8 November 2000 for failing to meet conditional promotion NCO Education System requirements.  This order was revoked by Orders 00-356-02, dated 21 December 2000 by Headquarters, 70th Regional Support Command.  Thus his USAR rank was restored to SFC with a date of rank of 31 December 1999.

5.  He was honorably discharged from the USAR effective 25 October 2001 in the rank of SFC. 

6.  After a break in service, he enlisted in the USAR in the rank/grade of SFC/E-7 on 28 March 2007.  

7.  On 9 October 2007, he enlisted in the Regular Army in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6.  A grade determination was conducted to determine the grade and MOS that were needed by the Army at that time.  He enlisted for the U.S. Army Training Enlistment Program for training in MOS 13D (Field Artillery Tactical Data System Specialist). 

8.  On 16 January 2009, he executed a reenlistment in the Regular Army for an indefinite period in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6. 

9.  An advisory opinion was received from HRC on 31 March 2015 in the processing of this case.  An advisory official recommended denial of the applicant's request.  The advisory official stated that when prior service Soldiers wish to reenter the Regular Army, a grade determination is conducted to determine the MOS and grade that is needed by the Army.  At the time of his enlistment in 2007, the applicant elected to enlist as a SSG and be retrained in MOS 13D as reflected on his enlistment contract.  He will have to compete for promotion with his peers in his current MOS. 
10.  The applicant was provided with a copy of this advisory opinion but he did not respond. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant previously held the rank/grade of SFC/E-7 in the USAR.  After a break in service, he enlisted in the Regular Army.  When prior service Soldiers elect to reenter the Regular Army, a grade determination is conducted to determine the MOS and grade that is needed by the Army. 

2.  At the time of his enlistment in 2007, the applicant elected to enlist as a SSG/E-6 and be retrained in MOS 13D as reflected on his enlistment contract.  After successful completion of training, he was awarded MOS 13D.  Provided he is otherwise eligible, the applicant will have to compete for promotion with his peers in his current MOS.  The determination for his Regular Army grade was not related to completion of schooling in the USAR.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

      
      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001605



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001605



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016621

    Original file (20100016621.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states he was promoted to sergeant first class (SFC)/E7 on 30 June 1998 contingent upon enrollment in the Noncommissioned Officer Education System (NCOES) within 12 months of the effective date of promotion and completion within 24 months. A Soldier who has been conditionally promoted must be enrolled and graduated from the NCOES course within the specified period of time. A Soldier must be enrolled in ANCOC within 12 months of the date of promotion and be a graduate of that course...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011259C070208

    Original file (20040011259C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides her Active Guard Reserve assignment orders; her email notification of selection for promotion; a Personnel Action (DA Form 4187) requesting deferment of ANCOC with an attachment; a Personnel Action requesting to attend Service School; a Personnel Action requesting separation; her Request and Authority for Leave (DA Form 31); e-mails regarding her expiration of term of service (ETS) paperwork, rank reduction, and service member assistance; an amendment to reduction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018293

    Original file (20080018293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was reduced from E-7 back to E-6 for not completing the Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course (ANCOC) Phase II in time even though he had physical problems. His effort to complete ANCOC is evident by the completion of ANCOC Phase I a second time, even after the reduction and suspension of his conditional promotion effective in January 2003. There is no evidence of record which indicates he completed ANCOC Phase II.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065963C070421

    Original file (2001065963C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he completed Phase I of ANCOC on 23 April 1995; however, his unit administrator (UA) failed to schedule him for Phase II of ANCOC. He is now requesting that he be rescheduled to attend ANCOC and complete Phase I and II with restoration of his rank of SFC or be scheduled to attend only Phase II of ANCOC. The commander requested a waiver of one-year time requirement for completion of ANCOC following the applicant's conditional promotion with the provision that he be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074341C070403

    Original file (2002074341C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. However, if proper procedures were followed in accordance with Army Regulation 140-158, he would be attending ANCOC in the rank of SFC. It states, in pertinent part, that when a soldier fails to complete a required NCOES course, the soldier's name will be removed from a promotion list, and if conditionally promoted, the soldier will be reduced in accordance with paragraph 7-12d.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014443

    Original file (20080014443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication or evidence in the applicant's records that she was enrolled in or completed Phase II of MOS 54B BNCOC as stipulated in her promotion orders. The evidence of record further shows the applicant was conditionally promoted to SSG/E-6 on 30 June 1998 in MOS 54B contingent upon her successful completion of BNCOC. With respect to the applicant's contention that she should be considered for promotion to SFC/E-7, there is no evidence that the applicant met grade and/or NCOES...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075439C070403

    Original file (2002075439C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states that a soldier who accepts a promotion with the condition that he or she must enroll in, and successfully complete, a specified NCOES course, and fails to meet those conditions, or is subsequently denied enrollment, or becomes an academic failure, or does not meet graduation requirements, or is declared a "No Show," will be reduced to the grade and rank held prior to the conditional promotion. It states that under promotion procedures of this regulation, a soldier may be promoted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069036C070402

    Original file (2002069036C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This policy stated that soldiers, who have not yet attended ANCOC prior to their effective date of promotion to SFC, would be promoted "conditionally." The evidence of record shows that the applicant was administered an APFT on 11 April 2000, for preenrollment at ANCOC and failed the push-up event, which precluded him from attending ANCOC. The applicant's case was reviewed by the USAR AGR Enlisted Reduction Panel, which determined that the applicant should be reduced in rank for failing to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016275

    Original file (20080016275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to SSG on 1 September 2002. He was accordingly scheduled to attend BNCOC; however, due to his surgery, he requested a deferment in July 2003 of his August 2003 BNCOC class. However, he provided no evidence to show he informed anyone between November 2003 and August 2004 (when he deployed) that he was medically cleared to attend BNCOC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005948

    Original file (20090005948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no available evidence showing the applicant's change in rank from SFC to SSG. He continuously served in the AGR program until 31 October 1998, when he retired by reason of sufficient service for retirement. Additionally, there is no evidence that physical health problems were the only reason that the applicant did not complete ANCOC and no evidence that failure to complete ANCOC was the reason that his promotion to SFC was effectively voided.