Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024269
Original file (20100024269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  13 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024269 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he has a shrapnel wound on his lower back which was noted on his retirement physical.  The shrapnel was from a grenade that went off while he was in the Republic of Vietnam.  He was supposed to have had a Purple Heart awarded for this injury but it did not happen.

3.  The applicant provides:

* one page of his Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) for his retirement physical examination
* his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 28 November 1978
* his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 October 1988

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of 

justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 December 1967 for a period of 3 years. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 13B (Cannon Crewman).

3.  He served in the Republic of Vietnam from 19 May 1968 to 13 May 1969.  

4.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart.

6.  The applicant's complete service medical records were not available for review.  The SF 88, dated 3 October 1988, for his retirement physical indicated he had a vertical scar on his right lower back.  The form also contains a note indicating he had a shrapnel wound on his lower back.

7.  On 15 December 1970, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  He had completed 2 years, 11 months, and 17 days of total active service.  He reenlisted on the following day.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 for this period of service does not show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

8.  There are no orders in his military personnel record awarding him the Purple Heart and his name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty listing.

9.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

10.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), then in effect, provided that the Purple Heart was awarded to any member of an Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services had been wounded, killed, or who had died as a result of a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no orders in the applicant's official military personnel file or in ADCARS awarding him the Purple Heart.  Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank and he is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing.

2.  The notes concerning the scar on his back on his SF 88 were reviewed.  The indication that it was from shrapnel wound was likely provided by a medical history provided by the applicant.  The determination of the etiology of the scar by the physician over 20 years after the fact cannot be ascertained.

3.  In the absence of evidence showing he was wounded as result of hostile action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment was made a matter of official record there is an insufficient basis to award the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024269



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024269



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017613

    Original file (20130017613.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Purple Heart. The applicant states, in effect, he actually received the Purple Heart at the time of discharge but it does not appear in his record. Although the applicant provides an SF 88 that showed at the time he was released from active duty he had a 4-inch scar that he did not have when he entered active duty, the evidence of record does not show, and he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014117

    Original file (20070014117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides several documents from his military personnel file in support of his request. The applicant's DD Forms 214 (dated 31 March 1968 and 1 February 1971) failed to show the Purple Heart as an authorized award. There are no orders officially awarding the applicant the Purple Heart, he is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty List, and there are no medical records available to show that he was treated for a wound as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017607

    Original file (20110017607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The Purple Heart requires: * a wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by military medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records * official orders awarding the decoration 4. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020521

    Original file (20110020521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Although his separation physical examination document notes shrapnel wound to his left forearm, there is no corroborating evidence that shows he met the criteria for award of the Purple Heart. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001087

    Original file (20120001087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods ending 29 January 1967, 9 January 1971, and 19 November 1975 * VA application for compensation or pension * VA medical records * VA rating decision * Standard Form (SF) 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 24 July 1975 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004024

    Original file (20120004024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received on 22 March 1967. He remembers treating the applicant for his wounds before he was evacuated for additional medical care; d. a letter from (then) SGT Theodore E. S-----z, dated 30 September 2007, who states he served with the applicant when he incurred minor wounds during hostile action on 22 March 1967. Thus,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021081

    Original file (20090021081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant, which give conflicting descriptions of the alleged wounding, are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. _______ _ X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003487

    Original file (20110003487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show two awards of the Bronze Star Medal, that he had hearing loss and shrapnel in his left arm, and in effect, award of the Purple Heart. His service record does not contain orders which show he was awarded any Bronze Star Medals or the Purple Heart or medical documentation which shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, his service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000982

    Original file (20150000982.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 1 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150000982 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Award) states the: a. Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of enemy action. There must be evidence confirming the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of, or was caused by enemy action, that the wound was treated by medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009149

    Original file (20080009149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the records of his deceased brother, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the FSM's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not indicate that he was a patient as a result of injuries/wounds received during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There are no general orders that show the FSM was awarded the Purple Heart and there is no evidence in his...