Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003487
Original file (20110003487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  25 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110003487 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show two awards of the Bronze Star Medal, that he had hearing loss and shrapnel in his left arm, and in effect, award of the Purple Heart.

2.  He states:

* he was awarded two Bronze Star Medals, but he never received them and they are not in his record
* he lost the majority of his hearing and he has shrapnel in his left arm, but there is no record of it
* he lost his hearing because a howitzer exploded in front of him
* the shrapnel in his arm came from him assisting a lieutenant during a firefight
* the doctor at the forward hospital tent told him it would do more damage to remove the shrapnel
* a superior officer told him and three other Soldiers that they would get the Bronze Star Medal
* his DD Form 214 is basically void of these details

3.  He provides his DD Form 214.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 27 January 1966.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11C (infantry indirect fire crewman).

3.  His service record contains a Standard Form (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) which shows he was evaluated for problems with his right ear on 16 April 1967.  The medical document indicated he heard a pulse; had a feeling of pressure; decreased hearing; history of childhood injury (thought to be the cause of symptoms); an old audiogram showed decreased perception in the 1,000 range in the right ear.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

* item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 4 July 1966 through 6 July 1967
* item 38 (Record of Assignments) does not show he was hospitalized in a “patient” status at any time
* item 40 (Wounds) no entries [blank]
* item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not list any awards of the Bronze Star Medal or the Purple Heart

5.  His service record does not contain orders which show he was awarded any Bronze Star Medals or the Purple Heart or medical documentation which shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  The Vietnam casualty listing does not list his name.

6.  His record contains an SF 88 (Report of Medical Examination) that shows he underwent a physical examination on 28 December 1967 for the purpose of his 


expiration of term of service.  This form shows he was given a physical profile of 111111 which indicates he was considered to possess a high level of medical fitness.  The examining physician declared the applicant was qualified for separation.

7.  His record also contains an SF 89 (Report of Medical History), dated
29 December 1967.  The examining physician noted he had slight hearing loss (from birth, no profile).  No medical documentation is available which indicates he sustained any shrapnel wounds.

8.  He was honorably released from active duty on 26 January 1968.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show award of any Bronze Star Medals or the Purple Heart.

9.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for any Bronze Star Medals or the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the:

   a.  Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

	b.  Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed enemy, or while engaged n military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The version in effect at the time did not provide guidance for entry of wounds sustained in action.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he was awarded two Bronze Star Medals is acknowledged.  However, his service record is void of evidence and he has not provided any evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded any awards of the Bronze Star Medal.  Additionally, a review of ADCARS failed to reveal any orders for award of any Bronze Star Medal pertaining to the applicant.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting this portion of his request.

2.  His request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show he had hearing loss and shrapnel in his left arm is also acknowledged.  However, he has not provided any evidence of sustaining a shrapnel wound and evidence shows his hearing loss resulted from a childhood condition incurred prior to entering the Army.  Additionally, Army Regulation 635-5 in effect at that time had no provision to record medical conditions on the DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant's service record does not contain orders for the Purple Heart.  No medical documentation is available which shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing.

4.  By regulation, in order to award the Purple Heart it is necessary to establish that a Soldier was wounded in action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  In the absence of evidence of record which shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x___  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003487



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003487



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003239

    Original file (20090003239.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no entry in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations), of the applicant's DA Form 20 showing he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was authorized to wear any unit awards that were awarded to his unit while he was a member of the unit. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register), which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows the unit the applicant was assigned to was awarded: the Valorous Unit Award, for action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019288

    Original file (20090019288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Evidence shows the applicant suffered a mortar wound to the left knee on 17 April 1967 as a result of hostile action that was treated by the appropriate medical personnel. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020468

    Original file (20110020468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the available evidence is sufficient as a basis for awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 16 May 1968 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. His service record does not show he was disqualified from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 25 October 1967 through 15 October 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077743C070215

    Original file (2002077743C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam from 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. This paragraph states that there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was entitled to and awarded the Purple Heart, the Air Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010688

    Original file (20080010688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214, dated 18 April 1969, shows he was awarded the Purple Heart for this wound. The available evidence to include the documents the applicant provided are insufficient to support award of a second Purple Heart. To receive a second award of the Purple Heart, the applicant must show that he was wounded a second time as a result of hostile action, that the wound was treated and the treatment was documented.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009850

    Original file (20100009850.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency rating throughout his service. The evidence of record shows he sustained shrapnel wounds to his left shoulder on 23 March 1967 in Vietnam and he appears to have been evacuated to a field hospital subsequent to this injury. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004321

    Original file (20120004321.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the Purple Heart for a wound he sustained while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), but it is not shown on his DD Form 214. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 3 November 1966 to 30 August 1968 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019790

    Original file (20130019790.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002782

    Original file (20080002782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214; a proposed citation for the Meritorious Unit Commendation; a Standard Form (SF) 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 16 March 1972; four pages of extracts from his service medical records; a DA Form 8-274 (Medical Condition – Physical Profile Record), dated 7 April 1969, and a DA Form 3349 (Medical Condition – Physical Profile Record), dated 9 May 1969. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was awarded an “Artillery Medal.” Evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015660

    Original file (20130015660.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service), service in the RVN from 12 July 1968 through 23 February 1970; b. item 33 (Appointments and Reductions), he was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 on 11 March 1969; c. item 38 (Record of Assignments): * Special Operations Augmentation [SOA] (Command and Control Center [CCC]), 5th Special Forces Group (Airborne) [SFG(A)], 1st Special Forces [SF] (18 July 1968 through 3 June 1969) * Medical Hold...