Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023910
Original file (20100023910.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100023910 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  He states that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart due to blowing out his eardrums while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).  He states that the September issue of the Veterans of Foreign War (VFW) magazine states, "Each service establishes its own eligibility criteria, but basically the wound must require treatment (and be given) on the battlefield by a medic/corpsman and/or a doctor in the hospital.  Finally, the treatment has to be officially recorded."

3.  He provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 5 November 1969; three Standard Forms (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), with treatment dates from 10 January 1968 through 17 October 1969; and a 2-page VFW magazine article, dated September 2010, in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army 4 April 1967.  He successfully completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 05C (Radio Teletype Operator).

3.  He arrived in the RVN and was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 1st Battalion, 27th Artillery on 3 November 1968.

4.  Three SFs 600, with treatment dates ranging from 11 July 1969 through 
17 October 1969, show he was treated for hearing loss and pain in both his ears. The documents indicate he was treated for his ear injuries on three different occasions and returned to duty.  

5.  He departed the RVN on 2 November 1969.  On 5 November 1969, he was honorably released from active duty after completing 2 years, 7 months, 2 days of creditable active service.

6.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaigns Ribbons or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart.  

7.  There are no general orders in his service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart.  There also is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in the RVN.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

8.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was wounded, and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart.

9.  His complete Army Medical Treatment Records are unavailable for review.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he should be awarded the Purple Heart.  He provided three SFs 600, which indicate he was treated for hearing loss and pain in both his ears.  While the injuries to his ears are unfortunate, there is no evidence in the available records and he has not provided evidence that shows his injuries were the direct result of hostile action. 

2.  Lacking any corroborating evidence of record showing the he was treated for a wound/injury that was the direct result of or caused by enemy action, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case.

3.  Regrettably, in view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant granting his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023910





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023910



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011077

    Original file (20110011077.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The VA disability award letter and the orders awarding him the Bronze Star Medal are not sufficient evidence as a basis for an award of the Purple Heart. ____________x___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002451

    Original file (20110002451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant contends his medical record should be corrected to delete the reference to "old injury" and he should be awarded the Purple Heart because he was wounded while serving in the RVN when he sustained a perforated tympanic membrane of his right ear from a loud explosion. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010103

    Original file (20120010103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. In the absence of evidence to show he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for such wound/injury, and the injury/wound was made a matter of official record, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009210

    Original file (20090009210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he has provided military medical records that show he was wounded as a result of enemy action. The applicant provided a copy of his SF 600 and SF 93 which are considered new evidence and merit consideration by the Board. In the absence of such evidence that clearly states he was injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis to grant award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011159

    Original file (20080011159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain an SF 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 16 November 1971, which was completed by the attending physician at the time of the applicant’s medical examination prior to his release from active duty. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military service records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not show an entry in Item 40 (Wounds) or list the Purple Heart in Item 41...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022453

    Original file (20120022453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110014555, on 12 January 2012. It also states in order to award the Purple Heart there must be evidence of the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003362

    Original file (20140003362.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the Purple Heart was presented to him by Congressman Ernie Fletcher on 31 March 1999; however, the award is not present in his military records. His military records also do not contain orders awarding him the Purple Heart. d. A letter from the Chief, Personnel Support Division, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, dated 20 July 1998, to a Representative in Congress which informed the representative that a review of the applicant's military and medical records failed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018654

    Original file (20110018654.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * a letter from the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, MO, dated 15 August 2011 * Military Order of the Purple Heart, Instruction for Obtaining a Purple Heart * a Standard Form (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) with an entry dated 12 October 1970 * an SF 519A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015660

    Original file (20130015660.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service), service in the RVN from 12 July 1968 through 23 February 1970; b. item 33 (Appointments and Reductions), he was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 on 11 March 1969; c. item 38 (Record of Assignments): * Special Operations Augmentation [SOA] (Command and Control Center [CCC]), 5th Special Forces Group (Airborne) [SFG(A)], 1st Special Forces [SF] (18 July 1968 through 3 June 1969) * Medical Hold...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082187C070215

    Original file (2002082187C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Also, the applicant’s hearing in his right ear is within normal limits but a profound hearing loss was present in the left ear. In the opinion of the Board, since the applicant was treated for his injury by military medical personnel, had there been sufficient medical evidence to support his receiving the PH, it would have been recommended at the time of his treatment.