IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    31 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100023702 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge.

2.  The applicant states that it has been over 23 years since his discharge and he learned a few years after his discharge that he had a manic-depressive and social anxiety disorders and he believes that those disorders influenced his decision to leave the Army as he did.  He goes on to state that he was not diagnosed with these problems while in the Army; however, he feels that he had them in basic, advanced individual training (AIT) and at his permanent duty station and having said that, he realizes that he voluntarily went absent without leave (AWOL) and technically deserted the Army.  He concludes by stating that he made a mistake and is asking the Army to consider his request.

3.  The applicant provides no supporting documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on 21 January 1965 and enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 April 1987 for a period of 3 years and training as a fire support specialist.  He completed his training and was transferred to Fort Ord, California for his first duty assignment on 17 August 1987.

3.  On 29 August 1987 he went AWOL and remained absent in desertion until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Ord on 22 October 1987 and charges were preferred against him for the AWOL offense.

4.  On 30 October 1987, after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In his request he indicated he was making the request of his own free will without coercion from anyone and that he was aware of the implications attached to his request.  He also admitted he was guilty of the charges against him or of lesser included offenses which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge.  He acknowledged he understood he could receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions and he might be deprived of all benefits as a result of such a discharge.  He also elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf or to offer any mitigating circumstances.

5.  The appropriate authority approved his request for discharge on 8 February 1988 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.

6.  Accordingly, he as discharged under other than honorable conditions on 19 February 1988 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He had served 8 months and 27 days of total active service and had 54 days of lost time due to AWOL.

7.  There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial at any time after charges have been preferred.  A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against him or her or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and he or she must indicate he or she has been briefed and understands the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge he or she might receive.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

9.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.  Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons were appropriate under the circumstances.

2.  After being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his record.  In doing so he admitted guilt to the charges against him.
 
3.  The applicant's contentions have been noted and they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief under the circumstances, especially given the length of his absences, his undistinguished record of service, the lack of mitigating circumstances at the time and the short period of his service.  His service simply did not rise to the level of a discharge under honorable conditions.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023702





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023702



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1