Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023594
Original file (20100023594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100023594 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage be terminated.

2.  He states he was coerced into electing SBP and he was not interested in the program.

3.  He does not provide any additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he retired from the Regular Army on 30 November 1978 in the rank of staff sergeant.

3.  A DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel), dated 
1 November 1978, shows he elected full SBP coverage for spouse and dependent children.

4.  Information provided by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) verified that the applicant had been in a non-pay status for some time and had only made one SBP payment in May 2006.

5.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted on 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name.  An election to decline to participate in the SBP must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse (or child only coverage, if applicable) coverage. 

6.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  Members retired for more than two years as of 17 May 1998 were authorized a one-year opportunity (17 May 1998 through 16 May 1999) to disenroll.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  This information was highly publicized in Army Echoes, an Army bulletin published and provided to retirees on a regular basis.

7.  Public Law 105-261, enacted 17 October 1998, established paid-up coverage under the SBP.  Effective 1 October 2008, no reduction may be made in the retired pay of a participant in the SBP for any month after the later of (1) the 360th month for which the participant’s retired pay is reduced; or (2) the month during which the participant attains age 70.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows he completed a DA Form 4240 on 1 November 1978 and elected full coverage for spouse and dependent children.  The fact that he now argues that he was coerced into electing SBP is not sufficient justification to terminate his SBP coverage.

2.  Evidence of record also shows he could have disenrolled from the SBP during the period May 1998 through May 1999.  There is no evidence and he has not provided any to show he attempted to terminate his SBP coverage during this period.  

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting his request.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023594





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023594



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004231

    Original file (20090004231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected by canceling his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election for spouse coverage. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. However, the option to terminate SBP participation was established in November 1997 and in 1998 Army Echoes would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019770

    Original file (20110019770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. DFAS records show he had an eligible "spouse" beneficiary for the entire period he paid into the SBP; therefore, neither he nor his children are entitled to a refund of the SBP premiums. Spousal concurrence is needed only when a married person elects to provide an annuity for his spouse at less than the maximum level or to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse. Records show that on 20 March 1978, although he had both a wife and dependent children, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020819

    Original file (20110020819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The applicant's DD Form 1883 shows he enrolled in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage on 10 December 1996. He is further advised...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007588

    Original file (20100007588.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states upon the FSM's retirement on 30 November 1996 he elected SBP coverage. On 2 March 1999, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656-2 in which he elected to terminate SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM's DD Form 2656-2, dated 2 March 1999 was invalid; b. showing the FSM's continued enrollment in the SBP for "spouse only" coverage; and c. paying the applicant the SBP annuity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010144

    Original file (20090010144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090010144 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s DD Form 2656-11 shows that on 8 January 2009 he verified that he had been notified by DFAS of the requirement to have 360 plus months toward Paid-Up SBP. Effective 1 October 2008, no reduction may be made in the retired pay of a participant in the SBP for any month after the later of : (1) the 360th month for which the participant’s retired pay is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004655

    Original file (20120004655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 August 1987, he completed DD Form 1883 wherein he listed his retirement date as "17 June 1992." Three options were available: * Option A - elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation * Option B - elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60, but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday * Option C - elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60 Once a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017267

    Original file (20130017267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show that she and her spouse elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 (and participate in SBP), to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Once she made the RCSBP election the premiums would have to be recovered from her retired pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004305

    Original file (20120004305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100028330 on 23 June 2011. He applied to the Board to terminate his SBP coverage. Beginning 1 October 2008, a member who is at least 70 years of age and has made a minimum of 360 months of premium payments is eligible to have their monthly premiums stopped.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140008512

    Original file (AR20140008512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. At any time during the period of coverage, if a retiree with SBP spouse and child coverage were to die, his family would receive an SBP annuity. He retired on 1 September 2008, there is no evidence that shows he requested to withdraw from the SBP in the required timeframe.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013510

    Original file (20090013510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In Part V (SBP Election) on this form, the FSM indicated that he was married and did not have dependent children. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Considering there is evidence to show it was the FSM's intent to provide SBP coverage for the applicant, it would be appropriate, as a matter of...