Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023326
Original file (20100023326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100023326 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) should be corrected by adding the AGCM.  He claims he did not receive this award and he should have.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and Honorable Discharge Certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on
30 November 1961.  He was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 111.00 (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He was advanced to the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 on 16 August 1962, which is the highest rank/grade he held while serving on active duty.

3.  Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of the applicant’s DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service.  His record is void of any derogatory information or a unit commander's disqualification that would have precluded award of the AGCM.

4.  On 27 November 1963, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his military service obligation.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).

5.  The record shows the applicant continued to serve in the USAR until being honorably discharged on 31 October 1967 in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4.

6.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and there must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army’s awards policy.  Paragraph 2-10 contains guidance on the National Defense Service Medal.  It states it is authorized for any period of active duty service during the following periods:

* 27 June 1950 through 27 July 1954
* 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974
* 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995
* 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should have been awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal has been carefully considered and found to have merit.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant received “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service with no record of any derogatory information or a unit commander's disqualification that would have precluded this award.  As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 30 November 1961 through
27 November 1963 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

2.  The applicant served a qualifying period of honorable service for entitlement to the NDSM.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

__X_____  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
30 November 1961 through 27 November 1963; and

	b.  adding to item 26 of his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal
(1st Award) and the National Defense Service Medal.



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023326



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023326



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003131

    Original file (20140003131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all awards the FSM is authorized as a result of his active duty service. The evidence of record shows the FSM received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his active duty service and his records are void of derogatory information or a commander's disqualification that would have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014943

    Original file (20140014943 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the award of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) and any other awards to which he may be entitled. The applicant had "excellent" character and efficiency ratings throughout his service and there is no evidence of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM (1st award). As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014318

    Original file (20140014318 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the awards of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge). The applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the NDSM and that award should be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016625

    Original file (20110016625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's records indicates he is entitled to additional awards which are not shown on his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows he completed a qualifying period of service for award of the NDSM; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 18 March 1960 and 17 March 1963; b. Amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 to add the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002941

    Original file (20110002941.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of his official records show he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service and his records are void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001345

    Original file (20150001345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the NDSM and it should be added to his records at this time. However, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record and the evidence submitted with his application that he meets the criteria for award of the AFEM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 28 June 1960 through 27 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002035

    Original file (20130002035.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The award may be awarded retroactively to those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020969

    Original file (20090020969.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to award him the AGCM for the period of 6 June 1963 to 3 June 1965 and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st award) for the period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020273

    Original file (20140020273.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) and Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and that they be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge from Active Duty). Accordingly, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 10 September 1962 to 30 August 1965 and it should be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014626

    Original file (20130014626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received a "Good" conduct and efficiency rating for the period 31 March to 26 May 1961 while in advanced individual training (AIT). His military record shows he had a "Good" conduct rating during the period 31 March 1961 to 26 May 1961 while in AIT, which a disqualifying factor for award of the AGCM for his entire period of service. Since he had no record of any disciplinary action or a...