Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023164
Original file (20100023164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100023164 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 4 May 2007 to show he served more than 7 months and 8 days of net active service this period.

2.  The applicant states he entered active duty on 22 February 2004 and he was discharged on 4 May 2007.  This should add up to nearly 3 years of active service.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a letter from the National Personnel Records Center, dated 7 June 2010.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having had prior service in the U.S. Navy and Army National Guard, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 13 April 2001 in the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 for a period of 6 years.  He held military occupational specialty (MOS) 68W (Health Care Specialist).

3.  On 22 February 2004, he entered active duty (AD) in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status.  He was assigned to the 785th Military Police Battalion, Fraser, MI, as a Human Resources sergeant.

4.  The complete facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not available for review with this case.  However, his official records contain a
DD Form 214 for the period ending 4 May 2007 that shows he was discharged from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 14, by reason of misconduct - civil conviction.  This form shows the following in:

* item 12a (Date Entered AD This Period) the entry "2004  02  22"
* item 12b (Separation Date This Period) the entry "2007  05  04"
* item 12c the entry "0000  07  08"
* item 29 (Dates of Time Lost This Period) the entry "Under [Title] 10, USC [U.S. Code], [section] 972:  20040930 - 20070504"

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  Chapter 2 of this regulation states extreme care is used in completing the record of service block since post-service benefits, final pay, retirement credit, and so forth are based on this information.  It states for:

	a.  item 12a, enter the beginning date of the continuous period of AD for issuance of this DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued.

	b.  item 12b, enter the Soldier’s transition date; this date may not be the contractual date if Soldier is separated early, voluntarily extends, or is extended for make-up of time lost, or retained on active duty for the convenience of the Government.

	c.  item 12c, the amount of service this period, computed by subtracting item 12a from 12b.  Time Lost under Title 10, USC, section 972, is deducted.

	d.  item 29, show time lost and subtract it from item 12c if the time lost was not "made good."  Time lost under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972 is not creditable service for pay, retirement, or veteran’s benefits.  However, the Army preserves a record (even after time is made up) to explain which service between date of entry on active duty (item 12a) and separation date (item 12b) is creditable service.  For enlisted Soldiers, item 29 shows inclusive periods of time lost to be made good under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The complete facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's discharge are not available for review with this case.  However, his official records show he was discharged by reason of misconduct - civil conviction and he had 2 years, 7 months, and 5 days of time lost, from 30 September 2004 through 4 May 2007. There is no evidence that this time lost was made good.

2.  He entered active duty on 22 February 2004 and he was discharged on 4 May 2007.  The total period covered by this DD Form 214 is 3 years, 2 months, and 13 days.  However, when subtracting his time lost, his net active service this period reduced to 7 months and 8 days, which is correctly shown on his
DD Form 214.

	2007  05  04		Separation date this period
   -	2004  02  22		minus dated entered AD this period
	0003  02  13		equals total active service this period
   -	0002  07  05		minus time lost under Title 10, USC, section 972
	0000  07  08		equals net active service this period

3.  Based on the foregoing, the applicant is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ____X___  _____X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________X________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023164



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023164



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009028

    Original file (20090009028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214; three pages from his enlistment contract; a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action); and his previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision AR20040002622, dated 7 April 2005. The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 January 1985 for a period of 3 years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003817C070206

    Original file (20050003817C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided documents which confirm his record of service and military service dates; however, this evidence does not support a change to Item 12a. The evidence of record shows that the applicant's discharge date from active duty was 23 January 1985. Therefore, Item 12c of the applicant's DD Form 214 is correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011413

    Original file (20060011413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that he served 2 years, 1 month, and 12 days. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Although the applicant contends that he served from 15 January 2002 until 3 February 2004, evidence of record shows he was AWOL from 5 January 2003 to 7 December 2003. Since the applicant was discharged on 3 February 2004, his lost time was not “made...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001060

    Original file (20110001060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show 4 years, 5 months, and 3 days in item 12c (Net Active Service this Period) and 22 days in item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service). The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 1 year, 6 months, and 24 days of creditable active service. Therefore, his DD Form 214 correctly shows he completed a total of 1 year, 6 months, and 24 days of creditable active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007755

    Original file (20080007755.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 12c (Net Service This Period) and Item 14 (Military Education) of her 22 February 2007 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. The DD Form 214 she was issued upon her REFRAD shows she completed 4 years of active military service in Item 12c, and the entry "None" is contained in Item 14. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant entered active duty on the period covered by the DD Form 214 on 10 November 1999, and that she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003606C070205

    Original file (20060003606C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military service records contain a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 26 March 2004. However, the Army preserves a record (even after time is made up) to explain which service between date of entry on active duty (Block 12a) and separation date (Block 12b) is creditable service. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his discharge document to show that the date he entered active duty this period was 24 February 2000 and that he completed 3 years net...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026957

    Original file (20100026957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states she enlisted on 1 April 2004, completed her first term of service, and reenlisted in Iraq on 14 March 2008. The applicant provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), dated 14 March 2008 * DD Form 214, dated 20 January 2010 * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Removing from item 18 of her DD Form 214 the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016736

    Original file (20090016736.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence in his records that show he was awarded MOS 25F or that he was issued a DD Form 214 for this period of service. He then completed 6 months and 10 days when he was ordered to active duty on 1 August 2006 (the DD Form 215 adjusted this date to 28 July 2006) and he was released from active duty on 7 February 2007. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018939

    Original file (20090018939.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * she enlisted, served honorably, then reenlisted * her DD Form 214 does not reflect her honorable service * her DD Form 214 says she did not complete her first full term of service * her DD Form 214 shows only 12 months of foreign service in Iraq when she served 15 months in Iraq 3. Her DD Form 214 shows: * character of service – bad conduct * item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) – 20 January 2004 * item 12b (Separation Date This Period) – 28 August 2009 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003873

    Original file (20120003873.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows the following entries in: * Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty (AD) This Period) - 2006 03 14 * Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) - 2007 04 29 * Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) - 0001 00 20 5. The applicant correctly contends item 12c of his DD Form 214 was incorrectly calculated to show he completed 1 year and 20 days of net active service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...