Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022969
Original file (20100022969.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100022969 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the date of entry on his second DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to 29 August 1973.

2.  The applicant states he served two terms without a break in service.  The entry date on his 29 August 1975 DD Form 214 does not match the calculations of his service on the form.

3.  The applicant provides copies of two DD Forms 214, his 4 August 1971 enlistment orders, and his 29 August 1973 discharge and reenlistment orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 August 1971, completed training, and was awarded military occupational specialty 33F (Intercept Demultiplex Systems Repairman).

3.  On 28 August 1973, the applicant was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  His DD Form 214 shows he served 2 years and 25 days of active service.  He reenlisted on 29 August 1973.

4.  The applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal for the period 4 August 1971 through 3 August 1974.

5.  The applicant's official record contains no indication of any break in service on 29 August 1975.

6.  The applicant received a second honorable discharge on 28 August 1978.  The DD Form 214 for the second period of service, at item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty This Period), shows 29 August 1975.  Item 16a (Net Active Service This Period) shows 5 years, item 16b (Prior Active Service) shows 2 years and 25 days, and item 16c (Total Active Service) shows 7 years and 25 days.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he served two terms without a break in service.  The entry date on his second DD Form 214 does not match the calculations of his service on the form.

2.  There is no indication that the applicant had a break in service and the calculations on the 1978 DD Form 214 are consistent with a continuous period of active duty.

3.  Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that the date of entry at item 15 on the 28 August 1978 DD Form 214 is a typographical error and should be corrected to 29 August 1973.

BOARD VOTE:

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting the date of entry, at item 15 on the 28 August 1978 DD Form 214, to read 29 August 1973.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022969





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022969



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010525C070208

    Original file (20040010525C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show that he was appointed in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) from the Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC), Infantry (IN) Branch, as a second lieutenant effective 12 May 1969, with an educational delay to obtain a bachelor's degree. The applicant submits a copy of his MRD Computation Sheet that indicates his date of initial appointment as 12 May 1969; total break in service as 1 year, 2 months, and 18 days; authorized service time as 28 years; date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098940C070212

    Original file (03098940C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 01 JULY 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003098940 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 26 April 1978 the applicant was provided a copy of his separation document, a copy of the reduction orders, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018529

    Original file (20080018529.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his first period of military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140009358

    Original file (AR20140009358.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, amendment of the orders retiring him for permanent disability by replacing the entries "Not Applicable" with correct entries for the lines pertaining to "Disability retirement," "Basic pay," "Completed over 4 years of active service as Enl [enlisted] or WO [warrant officer]," and "Member of an armed force on 24 Sep 1975." He indicates the following statements listed on the orders are incorrect: * "Disability Retirement: Not Applicable" * "Basic pay: Not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003124

    Original file (20150003124 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A 23 February 1996 DD Form 214 shows active duty service (Active Guard/Reserve status) from 1 April 1984 through 23 February 1996. With a change of component (from Title 10 service to Title 32 service) on 23 February 1996 and again on 8 November 2004, the applicant was properly issued a DD Form 214. His item 12 service calculations on the 30 April 2007 DD Form 214 should be consistent with the entries from his earlier DD Form 214 as follows at – * (carried forward from 2004 DD Form 214)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018144

    Original file (20070018144.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    These orders confirm the applicant's retired pay percentage was based on his completion of 20 years, 1 month and 13 days of active military service, and that his retired basic pay rate was based on his completion of a total of 26 years, 8 months, and 3 days of military service. The evidence of record confirms the applicant reenlisted and entered this particular period of active duty service on 3 October 1972, and not 2 October 1973, as is currently entered in Item 15 of the DD Form 214 in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017854

    Original file (20080017854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the military occupational specialty (MOS) that is recorded on his discharge document. The applicant’s military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years and entered active duty on 31 December 1970. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show PMOS 76V4O because he was awarded the PMOS when he was promoted to the rank of SGT (E-5) on 4 April 1975.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016147

    Original file (20080016147.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 1 year, 9 months, and 26 days of creditable military service during this period of enlistment. The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service. At the time, a separate DD Form 214 was issued for each period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005622

    Original file (20140005622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), ending on 17 November 1978, to show in Item 8c (Home of Record (HOR) at Time of Entry Into Active Service) "Beaumont, TX" instead of "Sunset, LA." By law and regulation, the HOR is the place recorded as the home of the individual at the time of their enlistment or induction, appointment, or entry on active duty, and there is no authority to change the HOR officially recorded at the time of entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010710

    Original file (20090010710.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his final DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show all his authorized awards and decorations, all his military education, and all his foreign service credit. Upon his discharge, he received a DD Form 214 (form publishing date of 1 July 1966) that shows the following: a. in item 23c (Foreign Service/or Sea Service) the entry "USAREUR" and "09 months and 22 days"; b. in item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations...