Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022952
Original file (20100022952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100022952 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reentry (RE) Code be changed from a “3” to a “1.”

2.  The applicant states that he was separated from the military for asthma attacks and he has recent medical evidence which shows that he no longer has asthma,

3.  The applicant provides two documents from a Health Service organization in Nashville, Tennessee indicating that he tested normal on a Spirometry Test.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Anchorage, Alaska on 6 September 2001 for a period of 3 years, training as a heavy wheel vehicle mechanic and assignment to Fort Bliss, Texas.  He was transferred to Fort Jackson, South Carolina to undergo his basic training.

3.  The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s administrative discharge are not present in the available records.  However, his records contain a duly-authenticated DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) signed by the applicant which shows that the applicant was discharged on 5 November 2001 under the provisions of Army Regulation       635-200, paragraph 5-11 due to failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards.  He had served 2 months of active service and his service was uncharacterized.  He was issued a separation code of “JFW” and a RE Code of “3.”

4.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic policy for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-11 provides the criteria for the separation of personnel who did not meet procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment.  It states that medical proceedings must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate military medical authorities within 6 months of initial active duty for training which would have temporarily or permanent disqualified the member for entry into military service, had it been detected at the time of enlistment.  

5. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army and the USAR.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

6.  RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.  A waiting period of 2 years from separation is required before a waiver may be submitted through a local recruiting office.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In the absence of evidence to show otherwise, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.

2.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that he was issued the wrong RE Code at the time of his separation.  Although he is not precluded from applying for a waiver of his RE Code at a nearby recruiting office, there is no basis for the Board to change his RE Code at this time.

3.  Although he has submitted documents which indicate that he is currently fit as far as asthmas is concerned, the Board is not in a position to determine if he is acceptable for enlistment.  Accordingly, he must apply for a waiver and undergo an entrance medical exam in order for such a determination to be made.

4.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant his request, but he still has the option of applying for a waiver through his nearby recruiting office. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022952





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022952



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013622

    Original file (20100013622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5; therefore, he was properly issued an RE Code of RE-3 in accordance with the applicable regulations. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that he was assigned the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003321

    Original file (20140003321 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), dated 8 March 2013, to show he received a reentry (RE) Code of "1." An RE Code of "4" is non-waivable. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that he was assigned the wrong RE Code or that an error or injustice occurred in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029488

    Original file (20100029488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states at the time of his examination physicians found no substantial evidence to support an asthma diagnosis. The EPSBD determined that the applicant did not meet medical fitness standards for enlistment based on the applicant's history of asthma. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011830

    Original file (20100011830.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * spirometry report [asthma test] * individual copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The NGB Form 22 in his record shows that the applicant was discharged from the ARNG under the provisions of paragraph 8-23b(3), National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021085

    Original file (20130021085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings, Report of Medical Assessment, military medical records, and civilian laboratory results dated subsequent to his discharge. He completed 2 months of active service and his service was uncharacterized. The applicant failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that he was improperly diagnosed at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013992

    Original file (20100013992.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This portion of the EPSBD Proceedings also provided the applicant the opportunity to concur with the proceedings and request retention on active duty; to disagree with the proceedings because his condition did not exist prior to service; or to disagree with the proceedings because his condition was not disqualifying on entry and was aggravated by service. On 7 August 2009, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000572

    Original file (20130000572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings), dated 2 August 2011, reports: a. after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the EPSBD found that the applicant was unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards due to having exercise-induced asthma; and b. the opinion of the evaluating physician was that the applicant's medical condition existed prior to his entry into military service. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071028C070402

    Original file (2002071028C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In support of his request he submits a January 2002 statement from a physician who notes the applicant was evaluated "for a misdiagnosis of asthma" and that tests "show no evidence of asthma as well as no evidence of any pulmonary disease." Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11, stated that members who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009493

    Original file (20060009493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He did not get out for medical reasons, it was for physical training failure. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-2, on 19 June 1995, for 4 years, with a medical waiver. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007371

    Original file (20080007371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his uncharacterized discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge by reason of physical disability. The EPSBD diagnosed the applicant as having probable reactive airway disease/asthma and determined that he did not meet medical fitness standards for enlistment or induction under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 2-23(d)(2), due to a condition that existed prior to service (EPTS) that was aggravated by military service and that...