Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013622
Original file (20100013622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013622 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reentry (RE) Code be changed to a more favorable code.

2.  The applicant states that he is physically fit to perform his duties.

3.  The applicant provides a letter from a board certified physiatrist and a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 October 2008 for a period of 4 years and he was transferred to Fort Sill, Oklahoma to undergo inprocessing.

2.  On 4 November 2008, while still undergoing reception station processing,  he went on sick call complaining of lower back pain radiating down the left leg.

3.  On 18 November 2008, an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) determined that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment due to conditions that existed prior to service (EPTS) and recommended that he be discharged.

4.  The applicant concurred with the proceedings and requested discharge.  The appropriate authority approved the request for discharge on 25 November 2008. 

5.  On 4 December 2008 the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11 due to failed medical/physical procurement standards.  He had served 1 month and 6 days of active service and his service was uncharacterized.  He was issued a separation code of “JFW” and an RE Code of 3.

6.  The letter provided by the applicant indicates that he received treatment at a spine center in Cambridge, Massachusetts and that he can perform all activities required by the military.

7.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army and the United States Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

8.  RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.  Certain persons who have received nonjudicial punishment are so disqualified, as are persons with bars to reenlistment, and those discharged under the provisions of chapters 5, 9, 10, 13, 14, and 16 of Army Regulation 635-200.  A waiting period of 2 years from separation is required before a waiver may be submitted through a local recruiting office.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

2.  The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.

3.  The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation        635-200, chapter 5; therefore, he was properly issued an RE Code of RE-3 in accordance with the applicable regulations.

4.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that he was assigned the wrong RE Code at the time of his separation.  Although he is not precluded from applying for a waiver of his RE Code at a nearby recruiting office, there is no basis for the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to change his RE Code at this time.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013622



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013622



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006498

    Original file (20110006498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 November 2008 the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17, due to other designated physical and mental conditions based on his making suicidal statements and the diagnosis and recommendations of mental health professionals. Pertinent Army Regulations provide that prior to discharge or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009477

    Original file (20100009477.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued a separation code of “JFW” and a RE code of “3.” 3. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Chapter 3 of this regulation prescribes the basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007361

    Original file (AR20130007361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant, while in entry-level status was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability, with character of service described as general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050014641C070206

    Original file (AR20050014641C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9; therefore, he was properly issued an RE Code of RE-3 in accordance with the applicable regulations. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that he was issued the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009712

    Original file (20090009712.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his RE Code will not allow enlistment. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The applicant's military service records show that he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial and acknowledged guilt of the charges against him.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019042

    Original file (20090019042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination) dated 7 November 2001, the Record of Proceedings for Docket Number AR20080017459, and a personal letter as new evidence in support of his application. The differentiation in the size of the kidney organ is known, what is unclear is that in 2001 military medical authorities indicated the applicant's kidney did not function. The evidence of record shows the applicant's RE code was assigned based on his discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021874

    Original file (20090021874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 June 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090021874 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. While the applicant still has the right to apply for a waiver of his RE code to enlist at any recruiting office after 2 years have elapsed, there is no basis for this Board to change his RE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012094

    Original file (20100012094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be given an honorable discharge by reason of physical disability. On 19 February 2008, the applicant was separated with a general discharge under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200 for misconduct (serious offense). The applicant requests an honorable discharge by reason of physical disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014118

    Original file (20090014118.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 August 2007, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. Pertinent Army Regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or reason for discharge. He was given...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011544

    Original file (20100011544.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * He was not chaptered out of the Army, he was honorably discharged * He has Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) benefits with 80 percent service connected disability * He does not know what happened but someone dropped the ball on his discharge * According to Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) his Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) should have been resumed and completed since he was not chaptered out of the Army * He is in the...