Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022470
Original file (20100022470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100022470 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reentry (RE) Code be changed from a “3” to a “1.” 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he saw a recruiter and he asked what the medical board said their reasons for discharging him were and he was informed that he never went before a medical board.  He continues by stating he desires to go back into the Army without a waiver. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 November 2002 for military occupational specialty (MOS) 21B (Combat Engineer) and a cash enlistment bonus.  He completed his training, he was awarded the MOS, and he was transferred to Fort Riley, Kansas.  He deployed to Iraq from 7 September 2003 to 29 September 2004.  His records also show he was reduced to the pay grade of E-1 on 6 October 2005.

3.  The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not present in the available records; however his DD Form 214, which was authenticated by the applicant, shows he was honorably discharged on 28 October 2005 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17 due to a condition, not a disability.  He had served 2 years, 11 months, and 11 days of total active service and he was issued a separation code of “JFV” and an RE Code of “3.”

4.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations) serves as the authority for enlisted separations.  Paragraph 5-17 (Other Designated Physical or Mental Conditions) provides that commanders may approve separation for other designated physical or mental conditions not amounting to disability (Army Regulation 635-40) and excluding conditions appropriate for separation processing under paragraphs 5-11 or 5-13 that potentially interfere with assignment to or performance of duty.

5.  Army Regulation 601-280 (Army Retention Program) serves as the authority for reenlistments and establishes reenlistment control points (RCP).  It provides, in pertinent part, that Soldiers in the pay grade of E-1 at the end of their enlistment are not authorized to reenlist.  Soldiers who are reduced to the pay grade of E-1 are not allowed to extend their enlistment.

6.  RE-3 applies to persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but the disqualification is waivable.  Personnel separated with a separation code of “JFV” will be assigned an RE code of 3 at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant's discharge was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would have jeopardized his rights.

2.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted; however, his DD Form 214 appears to correctly reflect that he was discharged due to a physical condition that was not a disability and he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that he was not properly discharged in 2005 or that he was issued an improper separation and RE Code. 

3.  It is also noted that while his RE Code was issued based on his separation code, which is indicative of the reason for his separation, he would also have received an RE Code of 3 based on his pay grade at the time of discharge which also requires a waiver to enlist.

4.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant his request for a change of his RE Code.  However, he is not precluded from applying for a waiver at his local recruiting office if he can show that he has overcome the basis for his separation.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022470



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022470



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013400

    Original file (20090013400.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD Codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The SPD Code of JFV was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 5-17, for a condition that is not a disability. The available evidence clearly shows the applicant was awarded the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016652

    Original file (20100016652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he does not or has ever had the mental medical condition which was documented on his discharge form. He recommended the applicant be separated from the service under the provisions of paragraph 5-17 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations). The examiner stated the applicant was seen at the practice on 23 and 26 October 2009 for an evaluation to determine if the adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012325

    Original file (20100012325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 April 2005, the applicant's commander recommended her separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17. Army Regulation 635-200 further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. These individuals can best advise a former service member of the needs of the military at the time and are responsible for processing enlistment waivers.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006323

    Original file (20140006323.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. As such, there is no evidence of an error in assignment of his reason for separation or RE code. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002981

    Original file (20120002981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Department of the Army SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE code of "3" is the proper code to assign members who are separated for a condition, not a disability under the provisions of paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation 635-200 and who are assigned an SPD code of "JFV." By regulation, the RE code assigned is based on the SPD code assigned as a result of the authority and reason for separation and RE code of "3" was the proper code to assign the applicant based on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000865C071029

    Original file (20070000865C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jeanette B. McPherson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, a change to the reentry (RE) code he was assigned in conjunction with his 18 July 2005 separation from active duty. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012570

    Original file (20100012570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of her reentry eligibility (RE) code to an RE code of 1 so she can reenter the Army. It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code JFV is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of a condition, not a disability. Army Regulation 635-200 further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002268

    Original file (20090002268.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The recommendation was that the applicant be expeditiously separated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17. The commander cited the information contained in his Mental Status Evaluation as the basis for his recommendation. Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program), in pertinent part, provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000122

    Original file (20100000122.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He wants to enlist in the Army and cannot do so with RE code 3 on his DD Form 214. b. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) states prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or reason for discharge. The "JFV" SPD code (condition, not a disability) is the correct code for Soldiers separated under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004020

    Original file (20130004020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SPD code "JFV" is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of "physical condition, not a disability." Therefore, the applicant's assigned RE code of 3 is also correct. These individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process enlistment waivers for the applicant’s RE code.