BOARD DATE: 7 August 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002981
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests a change to his reentry (RE) code.
2. The applicant states he was forced out of the Army and would like the opportunity to prove he is physically and mentally fit to serve.
3. The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army, on
25 July 2005, and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 92Y (Unit Supply Specialist). His record shows he was advanced to specialist (SPC)/E-4, on 1 February 2008, and this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.
3. A MEDCOM Form 4038 (Report of Behavioral Health Evaluation) in the applicant's record shows he underwent a mental health examination on
17 August 2008. The examining psychiatrist diagnosed the applicant with an adjustment disorder, mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, depression The examiner psychiatrically found the applicant had the mental capacity to understand and participate in the proceedings and recommended the applicants separation under the provisions of paragraph 5-17 (Condition not a disability), Army Regulation 635-200.
4. On 31 August 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant action was being initiated to separate him under the provisions of paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation 635-200 based on the applicant having been diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotion and conduct.
5. On 3 September 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action, its effects, and of the rights available to him in connection with the separation action. Subsequent to receiving this counsel, the applicant waived his right to submit statements in his own behalf and his right to an administrative separation board.
6. The separation authority approved the applicants separation under the provisions of paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation 635-200 and directed the applicants service be characterized as honorable. On 31 October 2008, the applicant discharged accordingly. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued at the time shows he held the rank of SPC/E-4 and had completed 2 years, 3 months, and 6 days of active military service. It also shows he was separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of a condition, not a disability and that based on this authority and reason for discharge, he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of "JFV" and a corresponding RE code of "3."
7. Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes, including RA RE codes. An RE code of "3" applies to persons who have a waivable disqualification. Chapter 4 states recruiting personnel have the responsibility for initially determining whether an individual meets current enlistment criteria and are responsible for processing waivers.
8. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It provides for assigning the SPD code JFV to Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of condition, not a disability. The Department of the Army SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE code of "3" is the proper code to assign members who are separated for a condition, not a disability under the provisions of paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation 635-200 and who are assigned an SPD code of "JFV."
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants request to change his RE code has been carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim. The evidence of record confirms competent military medical authorities determined the applicant was suffering from a mixed adjustment disorder which was determined to be a condition, not a disability and recommended his separation for this reason.
2. The record confirms his separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation. All requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
3. By regulation, the RE code assigned is based on the SPD code assigned as a result of the authority and reason for separation and RE code of "3" was the proper code to assign the applicant based on the authority and reason for separation. As a result, the RE code of "3" was and remains valid. The applicant is advised that an RE code of "3" indicates a waviable disqualification. Therefore, if he desires to reenlist he should contact local recruiting officials who are responsible for processing RE code waivers.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__X___ ____X____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120002981
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120002981
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004349
The evidence contained in the applicants record indicates that on 23 July 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental conditions, specifically for having an adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct. AR 635-200, paragraph 5-1, states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020139
The examining psychologist found the applicant met the criteria for administrative separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17 (Other Mental Disorders), and strongly recommended the applicant's expeditious separation. His record is void of any documentation, and he has not provided any documentation, that shows he suffered any physical or mental injuries or incidents during his period of service in Iraq. This regulation provides that prior to discharge or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016652
The applicant states he does not or has ever had the mental medical condition which was documented on his discharge form. He recommended the applicant be separated from the service under the provisions of paragraph 5-17 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations). The examiner stated the applicant was seen at the practice on 23 and 26 October 2009 for an evaluation to determine if the adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015081
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The SPD code JFV is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17. His record confirms he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of other physical and/or mental medical conditions not compatible with military service after being diagnosed with an adjustment disorder by competent military medical authorities.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014062
Subsequent to the applicant's acknowledgement, his immediate commander initiated separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of other designated physical or mental conditions. It identifies SPD code "JFV" as the appropriate code to assign to enlisted Soldiers who are administratively discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, based on a condition, not a disability. The applicant's request for an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002558
On 12 January 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant action was being initiated to separate him under the provisions of paragraph 5-17 (condition, not a disability), Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) based on the applicant having been diagnosed with a mixed adjustment disorder. The Department of the Army SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE code of "3" is the proper code to assign members who are separated for a condition, not a disability under the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007458
He successfully completed Basic Combat Training (BCT), and AIT and a 2-mile run was the only thing that kept him from being assigned to Fort Stewart, GA. d. He truly wants a chance to reenter military service. On 28 September 2008, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him under Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17, by reason of other designated physical or mental...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009458
He also acknowledged that he would be ineligible to apply for enlistment into the Army for a period of 2 years after discharge. It states the SPD code of JFV is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635200, paragraph 517 for a condition, not a disability. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013488
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his reentry eligibility (RE) code as "1" so he may reenter the military. On 13 July 2008, his unit commander notified him of the intent to recommend him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, due to his diagnosis of an "adjustment disorder with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130019645
The evidence contained in the applicants record indicates that on 12 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of being diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with anxiety that had resulted in his inability to adjust to the demands of the military while being separated from his wife and his fears of having cancer, and was recommended to be separated from the service under...