Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004283
Original file (20120004283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  11 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004283 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be paid the second portion of a National Guard Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB).

2.  The applicant states he was granted the bonus and received the first installment of the of it in 2008.  When he inquired when he would receive the second portion, he was told that the contract documentation had been lost.  He provided information to substantiate his claim and was told he would receive the bonus only to later be told that this later documentation had also been lost.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* a 2008 bank statement 
* a Memorandum For Record from Lieutenant H___-H___
* a Memorandum For Record from Captain (CPT) H____
* A request for an exception to policy (ETP) from the Alaska Army National Guard (ALARNG), Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, 
* his request for the second installment of his bonus the denial memorandum for the bonus
* a National Guard Bureau denial of the ETP

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is an AKARNG captain with over 14 years of service.  He is currently on the promotion list for major.

2.  In 2006, he transferred to the AKARNG from the Florida ARNG.  He was granted Federal Recognition as an Military Intelligence Officer in the Area of Concentration (AOC) 35D (All Source Intelligence).   

3.  In 2008, the applicant was serving as the Assistant S2 with reassignment as the Assistant Security/Intelligence Officer for the 207th Infantry Group in November 2008.  

4.  A review of National Guard critical AOC's for 2008, shows the AOC 35D was considered a critical AOC at that time.  The 3-year retention bonus at this time was $20,000.00 to be paid in two increments.   Several documents report that the applicant signed a CSRB agreement in August 2008.  

5.  The applicant's bank statement shows a deposit of $384.81 from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) on 27 August 2008 and a $7,499.25 DFAS deposit on 29 August 2008.

6.  The applicant inquired about the second half of his bonus and was advised that there was no record of his CSRB agreement documentation.

7.  The two officers who had been assigned, in 2008, as Recruiting and Retention officers submitted Memorandums For Record on the applicant's behalf. Both officers state they recalled the applicant's completion of the CSRB documents and recall that the documents were forwarded for payment and inclusion in the applicant's file.

8.  The applicant's command requested he be granted an Exception to Policy (ETP) and afforded the second half of his CSRB.

9.  On 8 December 2011, the Nation Guard Bureau, Chief, Guard Strength Directorate, denied the ETP.  The Chief stated the applicant had signed the CSRB Written Agreement on 5 August 2008 for the critical skills AOC 35D, for which he was qualified.  At the time the second installment was due a copy of the agreement could not be located.  The Chief cited Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1205.21, paragraph 6.2, which requires each recipient to sign a written agreement to receive the bonus.  The State Incentive Manger was to terminate the incentive without recoupment.

10.  A copy of the applicant's pay record at DFAS, dated 30 September 2008, shows the applicant was processed for a $20,000.00 CSRB.  He received half of the bonus amount, from which $2,499.75 was withheld for taxes, leaving him a payment of $7,499.25. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant qualified for and was granted a $20,000.00 CSRB in 2008.  

2.  It appears that due to improper record keeping, an actual copy of the agreement was not retained in his Army Human Resource Record (AMHRR).  

3.  The statements from command personnel, who were involved in the processing of the CSRB, attest to the fact that the applicant signed the proper written agreement in August 2008.  

4.  These statements are supported by his pay records that clearly show that, in August 2008, he was granted a $20,000.00 CSRB.  The pay record shows issuance of payment for half of the bonus, less taxes, and the applicant's bank statement shows he received the first half of the bonus on 29 August 2008.

5.  The applicant has met his obligation to serve in his AOC for over three years and it is an injustice to deny him the second half of his CSRB due to loss of the applicable form.  The loss of this form was through no fault of his own. 

6.  Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected to show he completed the CSRB written agreement on 5 August 2008, a copy of the agreement was properly filed in his records, and he is entitled to the second half of the bonus at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

___x__  ___x_____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing a completed the CSRB written agreement dated 5 August 2008 was properly filed in his records; and 
	b.  directing DFAS to pay the applicant the second half of the bonus, less appropriate taxes.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004283





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004283



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003483

    Original file (20140003483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * his CSRB was denied * he wants his CSRB paid in full * he maintained area of concentration (AOC) 13A (Field Artillery, General) for the duration of the 3-year obligation in the contract * he was granted an exception to policy (ETP) for the 1-day difference in the date for the witness's signature * the Arizona Army National Guard (AZARNG) processed the bonus control number and paperwork for the bonus * he had no control over the negligent 9-month delay in processing 3....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017840

    Original file (20130017840.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) in area of concentration (AOC) 11A (Infantry) [or AOC 53A (Automation Officer)]. The applicant indicated that he was eligible for a CSRB and that he would complete 6 years of commissioned service on 8 March 2009; the applicant was advised that he did not have to wait until 8 March 2009 to complete the agreement; he was provided instructions to place his initials in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021496

    Original file (20140021496.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an exception to policy (ETP) for payment of the remaining $10,000.00 of his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) and relief from recoupment of the portion already paid. The applicant states: * he was in an eligible position and eligible for the CSRB in 2008 and the necessary documents were sent to his headquarters and he was paid the first half of the bonus * he inquired about the unpaid portion of the bonus years later and he was informed that a records review was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016351

    Original file (20130016351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, approval of an exception to policy (ETP) allowing him to retain his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB). He provides: * self-authored memorandum, dated 30 August 2013 * Orders 317-1010, dated 12 November 2008 * Orders 216-1024, dated 4 August 2011 * Officer/Warrant Officer Written Agreement – Army Reserve Components (RC) CSRB * NGB memorandum, subject: Request for ETP for Officer CSRB (Applicant), dated 1 July 2013 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006765

    Original file (20120006765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. Paragraph 6i states that officers who meet the qualification and who execute a 3-year CSRB contract and service agreement will be paid $20,000.00. c. The applicant signed a CSRB agreement with the Ohio ARNG on 2 November 2008 in critical AOC 19A. The issue is confusing because NGB says his agreement shows his bonus AOC as 19A and his command says his bonus AOC was 19B, but the CSRB contract does not list any AOC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015768

    Original file (20120015768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The memorandum states: * On 20 November 2008 the applicant qualified for the CSRB in the amount of $20,000.00 * He met the criteria for the CSRB and was issued a bonus control number * His unit contacted that office to inquire about his second half of the incentive * Unfortunately that office could not assist him with his payment due to the working copy of his CSRB being placed into his records rather than the signed documents * The unit has recognized this error and has taken the necessary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007314

    Original file (20120007314.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official states in order to be eligible for the CSRB, ARNG officers must: a. be serving in the ARNG in the grade of captain (except for chaplains and Judge Advocates); b. have completed any current contractual obligation or bonus contract as a result of participation in either the Officer Accession or Affiliation Bonus; c. be fully qualified in one of the designated critical skills and extend in an Modified Table of Organization and Equipment (MTO&E) or "deployable" Table of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002373

    Original file (20140002373.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, the final Army Reserve Components Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) payment in the amount of $10,000 as shown in his 2008 contract. Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected to show he completed the CSRB written agreement and a Bonus Control Number was initiated on 7 October 2008, a copy of the agreement was properly signed and filed in his records, and he is entitled to the second payment of the CSRB at this time. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013345

    Original file (20130013345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After he received the first $10,000.00, he assumed all of the documentation for the CSRB anniversary payment was on file at both the unit and the State Incentive Office. The applicant signed a CSRB agreement with the UTARNG on 25 February 2008 in critical AOC 15B. Although an exception to policy was requested, the request for payment of the second installment of the CSRB in the amount of $10,000.00 was subsequently denied by NGB because the working copy of the CSRB agreement was filed in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009709

    Original file (20140009709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he received an officer CSRB in 2008 while on Title 10 orders overseas * in late 2013 the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) was audited for administration of its bonus incentive program * he was notified that his bonus was to be recouped due to wording on his orders, lack of a bonus control number, and lack of dates on his contract * he was told to submit an exception to policy (ETP) to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) * NGB denied his request and provided a number...