Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021640
Original file (20100021640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  17 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100021640 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records by issuing him a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for his military service while a member of the Army National Guard (ARNG) and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was never issued a DD Form 214 for his service at the time of his honorable discharge in 1999.  He needs this form to receive a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) home loan guarantee.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a letter from the Army Review Boards Agency, St. Louis, MO, dated 26 February 2007; a memorandum from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, dated 26 February 2007; a Statement of Service, dated 23 February 2007; and Orders D-04-920334, issued by the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, dated 6 April 1999.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 


substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's Statement of Service shows:

	a.  he enlisted in the USAR on 2 April 1991;

	b.  he was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) during the period 31 May to 1 August 1991 and 30 June to 28 September 1992;

	c.  he enlisted in the ARNG on 27 April 1993 and was discharged from this component on 1 October 1993; and

	d.  he remained a member of the USAR until his discharge on 6 October 1999.

3.  A DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report), dated 1 August 1991, reports that the applicant served on active duty from 31 May to 1 August 1991 [less than 90 days].

4.  Orders 247-98, issued by Headquarters, XVIII Airborne Corps, Fort Bragg, NC, dated 3 September 1992, awarded the applicant military occupational specialty (MOS) 37F, effective 28 September 1992.

5.  A DD Form 220, dated 28 September 1992, reports that the applicant served on active duty from 30 June to 28 September 1992 [less than 90 days].

6.  Orders D-04-920334, issued by the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis, dated 6 October 1999, honorably discharged the applicant from the USAR.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It states:

	a.  the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

	b.  a DD Form 214 will be prepared for Reserve component (RC) Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous active duty for training (ADT) or for less than 90 days when awarded an MOS.
	c.  a DD Form 214 will not be reissued to replace record copies or DD Forms 214 lost by Soldiers.  If no DD Form 214 is available, issue a statement of service or transcript of military record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected by issuing him a DD Form 214 for his military service while a member of the ARNG and the USAR.

2.  The DD Forms 220 contained in his record clearly show the applicant had two periods of ADT, both of which were for less than 90 days.  There is no evidence of any other active duty service.  The governing regulation requires a minimum period of 90 days for issuance of a DD Form 214 to RC Soldiers performing ADT, unless they were awarded an MOS.

3.  Orders show that the applicant was awarded an MOS, effective 28 September 1992, the last day of his last period of ADT.  Accordingly, he should have been issued a DD Form 214 for this period of ADT.  The applicant's available record does not contain a copy of this DD Form 214 and the applicant did not provide a copy of or contend that he did not receive a DD Form 214 for this period of ADT.  Regulatory guidance further prohibits reissuing a DD Form 214 when lost by Soldiers or if no DD Form 214 is available.  As such, a Statement of Service was appropriately issued to him on 23 February 2007.

4.  Furthermore, at the time of his discharge from the USAR in 1999, he was not on active duty.  Therefore, he was not authorized a DD Form 214 for this period of military service.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_x____  __x______  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100021640



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100021640



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011525

    Original file (20090011525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form shows her last name as "C-------" and her first name as "J--------." This form shows her last name as "C------" and her first name as "J--------." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing the applicant a DD Form 214 that captures her period of ADT from 6 January 2008 through 19 January 2008 with an entry-level status characterization of service; and b. reissuing the applicant an Honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011502

    Original file (20060011502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon completion of this 106 day period of active duty training she was released from active duty training with an uncharacterized separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 for "Completion of Required Active Service" and assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of "MBK." Chapter 4 of the regulation provides the guidance for "Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation" and states that a Soldier will be discharged or released from active duty upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010359

    Original file (20130010359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of release from ADT shows he completed 2 months and 23 days of active service. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge, and is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the circumstances of the separation warrant an under other than honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000887

    Original file (20100000887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect the correct time in service and character of service. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was released from ADT under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, by reason of expiration term of service, with an uncharacterized character of service. The DD Form 214 will be prepared for selected Soldiers, among which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024784

    Original file (20100024784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 10 June 1992 be corrected to show his basic training (BT). He was issued a DD Form 214 for active duty training (ADT) from 10 June to 1 September 1992 which was the second part of his SOTP. Army Regulation 635-5, paragraph 12e, in effect at the time states that a DD Form 220 is issued upon completion of the BT portion for members enlisted under the USAR SOTP and the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007501

    Original file (20130007501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) ending on 3 October 1964 to show: * him being activated for Operation Desert Storm on 22 January 1991 * his total years of service 2. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The available record shows the applicant served on ACDUTRA in his USAR status from 2 May 1964 to 3 October 1964.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003423

    Original file (20140003423.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her rank/grade as private first class (PFC)/E-3. The available evidence shows she was promoted to PFC/E-3 on 9 November 1986 during her Reserve service after she had been released from active duty and after her DD Form 214 had been issued. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020082

    Original file (20110020082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not contain the promotion orders showing the promotion date. He provided a memorandum he submitted to the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, St Louis, MO, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, dated 11 June 1999, requesting reconsideration for promotion to CPT. He provided a memorandum he received from an official at the USAR Personnel Command, St Louis, MO, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, dated 3 November 1999, stating this memorandum was in response to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002209

    Original file (20140002209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the characterization of his service from uncharacterized to honorable. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows in item 24 (Character of Service) the entry "UNCHARACTERIZED." It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008165

    Original file (20130008165.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Orders Number 57-10, dated 24 March 1992, which show he was awarded 42D1O as his primary MOS on 27 April 1992. c. a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 12 April 1993, which shows he was advanced to SP4/E-4 on the same date. Therefore, there is no basis for changing his DD Forms 214 to show any further active service beyond his completion of ADT from 30 April to 19 August 1991 and 22 November 1991 to 27 April 1992. Evidence of record shows his DD Forms 214, dated 19 August 1991 and 27...