IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 29 March 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021500
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.
2. The applicant states:
* he was in Vietnam from March 1969 through March 1970 and he was assigned to Battery B, 2nd Field Force
* he was attached to the 25th Infantry Division for 9 months
* he was in CuChi, DucLap, Licai, and Catoon
* all the places he mentioned were under rocket attack and arms fire daily
* he was in a combat zone and he never received a combat award
* his claim for post-traumatic stress disorder was denied by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and he would like his records corrected before he submits his appeal
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and photographs of himself in Vietnam.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the
3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 June 1968. He completed training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 13B (Field Artillery Basic).
3. He arrived in Vietnam on 13 March 1969 and he was assigned to Battery B, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Artillery. He departed Vietnam on 11 March 1970.
4. The applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 24 May 1971, due to seasonal employment. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the:
* Army Commendation Medal
* Army of Occupation Medal
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Two Overseas Service Bars
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Medal with Rifle Bar (M-14 and M-16)
5. The applicants record does not show that he was ever awarded an infantryman MOS or attached to the 25th Infantry Division.
6. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the Combat Infantryman Badge to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. This regulation stated that criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and that the Combat Infantryman Badge was the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service. Further, the Combat Infantryman Badge is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day to day combat. This regulation also stated the Combat Infantryman Badge was authorized for award to infantry officers, to enlisted personnel, and to warrant officers who had an infantry MOS and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not submitted sufficient evidence showing he met the criteria contained in the applicable regulation for entitlement to the Combat Infantryman Badge.
2. His record shows he completed training and he was awarded a field artillery MOS. He performed the duties of a Field Artillery Gunner while in Vietnam. His record does not show that he was an infantryman who was assigned or attached to an infantry unit that was engaged in active ground combat. Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ___X___ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090005994
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100021500
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013900
Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100026184, on 4 May 2011. The applicant's records show he held an artillery MOS and served with Artillery units in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the available records that show he met any of the three qualifying conditions for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016217C070206
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that: a. the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it is appropriate to award the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for his period of service from 15 September 1966 through 26 June 1968. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016912
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that he was recommended for, authorized, or awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007890
The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 29 October 1968. The applicant essentially requested that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, and provided a certificate which shows that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal during his service in Vietnam. As the applicant did not possess or serve in an infantry MOS at any time during his service in Vietnam, or was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026184
There is no evidence which shows he was awarded MOS 11B. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the CIB. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000991
There are no orders for the ARCOM or CIB in the applicant's available records. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the ARCOM as an authorized award; however, there are no orders for the ARCOM in the applicant's available records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 5 January 1968 through 18 December 1969, b. deleting award of the ARCOM and VSM from his DD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016806
Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in the following infantry MOSs of 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. To be entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the evidence must show the applicant held and served in an infantry MOS while assigned/attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regiment, or smaller size and he must have served in active ground...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018101
Although the evidence of record shows the applicant was assigned to the 39th Infantry of the 9th Infantry Division in Vietnam, evidence of record shows he served as a field artillery crewman during that assignment. In addition, there are no orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge and there is no evidence of record which shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size in Vietnam. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006762
Since the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal are already shown on the applicant's DD Form 214, these awards will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings, except to make a correction to the number of campaigns in which the applicant participated while he served in Vietnam. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, provides that the Good Conduct Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002454C070205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 September 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060002454 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...