Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026184
Original file (20100026184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  4 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100026184 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (light weapons infantryman).  He also requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). 

2.  The applicant states:

* He served with the 3rd Battalion, 22nd Infantry of the 25th Infantry Division and with the 2nd Battalion, 14th Infantry
* While in the service he performed as infantry for over a year with Company B, 3rd Battalion, 23rd Infantry and with the 2nd Battalion, 14th Infantry

3.  The applicant provides a letter, dated 16 October 2010, from a Member of Congress.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 July 1969.  He was awarded MOS 13A (field artillery basic crewman).  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in MOS 13A assigned to Batteries A and B, 7th Battalion, 11th Artillery of the 25th Infantry Division and Battery B, 1st Battalion, 30th Artillery of the 1st Cavalry Division during his assignment in Vietnam.  On 10 February 1971, he was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.

3.  Item 23a of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "13A10 FA [field artillery] BASIC."  His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award.

4.  Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of his DA Form 20 shows he was awarded primary MOS 13A effective 14 November 1969.

5.  There is no evidence which shows he was awarded MOS 11B.

6.  There are no orders for the CIB in the available records.

7.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the CIB.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

9.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam.  This regulation stated that criteria for award of the CIB identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and that the CIB was the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service.  Further, “the CIB is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day to day combat.”  This regulation also stated the CIB was authorized for award to infantry officers, to enlisted personnel, and to warrant officers who had an infantry specialty/military occupational specialty and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation in effect at the time provided, in pertinent part, that the primary MOS code number and title would be entered in item 23a on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although he contends he performed as infantry for over a year in Vietnam, there is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence to support this contention.  Evidence shows he was awarded MOS 13A which is properly shown in item 23a of his DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend item 23a of his DD Form 214.

2.  There are no orders for the CIB.  Evidence of record shows he served as a field artillery crewman during his assignment in Vietnam.  His DA Form 20 shows he was assigned to Batteries A and B, 7th Battalion, 11th Artillery of the 25th Infantry Division and Battery B, 1st Battalion, 30th Artillery of the 1st Cavalry Division in Vietnam.  There is no evidence of record which shows he was an infantryman who served in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size in Vietnam.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  __x______  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION








BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026184





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026184



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013900

    Original file (20110013900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100026184, on 4 May 2011. The applicant's records show he held an artillery MOS and served with Artillery units in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the available records that show he met any of the three qualifying conditions for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013316

    Original file (20100013316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge in the available records. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001922

    Original file (20130001922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides a request for award of the CIB from the Assistant Adjutant, Headquarters, 58th Infantry Brigade (Separate), Maryland Army National Guard, dated 28 April 1980, which states: * the approximate dates were 20 September 1970 to 22 October 1970 * he commanded Battery B, 1st Battalion, 77th Field Artillery Regiment * his unit was in direct support of 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment, 2nd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division * the commander of the 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004012

    Original file (20090004012.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 3 February 1969 through 7 September 1970 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. The applicant’s DA Form 20 confirms that throughout his assignment to the RVN, he held and served in an artillery MOS with an artillery unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002093

    Original file (20120002093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014043

    Original file (20090014043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There are no orders in the applicant's reconstructed records that show he was awarded the CIB. In the absence of evidence that the applicant held an infantry MOS and was an active participant in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027964

    Original file (20100027964.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record is also void of documentation showing he was awarded the CIB. In a statement provided with his application, the applicant indicated that he served with 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry, as an RTO and forward observer, but he was not eligible for the CIB because of his MOS. While the available documentation generally confirms his account of his service in Vietnam, it does not show definitively that he was assigned primary duty under MACV as an RTO accompanying infantry or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018351

    Original file (20090018351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in Vietnam. This case is being considered using the applicant’s DD Form 214. There is no evidence which shows the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS and was engaged in active ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003522

    Original file (20150003522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003522 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He states the Board denied his request for award of the Purple Heart based on the available evidence. There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant should be awarded the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000991

    Original file (20150000991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders for the ARCOM or CIB in the applicant's available records. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the ARCOM as an authorized award; however, there are no orders for the ARCOM in the applicant's available records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 5 January 1968 through 18 December 1969, b. deleting award of the ARCOM and VSM from his DD...