Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021135
Original file (20100021135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100021138 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests termination of her participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and reimbursement of all premiums paid to date.

2.  The applicant states that she and her husband were both counseled on the SBP and they both decided not to go forward with the plan.  Her husband signed the form in front of a witness in May 2007 when processing her paperwork for retirement.  She goes on to state that she has tried to remedy the problem and has been given the run-around trying to find her discharge files.

3.  The applicant provides an un-notarized statement from her spouse that essentially states the same as her application to the Board; a copy of her Retiree Account Statement with a statement effective date of 29 January 2011; and a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).  The applicant subsequently provided a notarized statement from her husband, dated 29 March 2011, requesting discontinuance of their participation in the SBP.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 March 1988.  She served as a health care specialist through a series of continuous reenlistments and she was promoted to the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 on 1 July 2003.


2.  The applicant’s records, though somewhat incomplete, show that her last duty assignment was in Europe (Belgium).  On 31 March 2008, she was retired and she was transferred to the Retired List effective 1 April 2008.  She had served   20 years and 14 days of total active service.

3.  The Retiree Account Statement provided by the applicant shows she is paying full spouse coverage for SBP coverage in the amount of $102.49 per month.

4.  In the processing of this case the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) was contacted to determine what election the applicant made regarding enrollment in the SBP.  Officials at DFAS indicate that SBP coverage was automatically initiated due to non-receipt of a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Pay), the form used to make an SBP election.

5.  There is no indication in the available records that shows the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656-1 (SBP Termination Request) or that she has made any attempt to terminate participation in the SBP.

6.  Public Law 99-145, enacted on 8 November 1985, but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provided less than maximum spouse coverage.

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448 provides that effective 1 March 1986, a married member is enrolled with spouse coverage on full retired pay at the time of retirement unless that spouse has concurred in writing to another election requested by the member pursuant to Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation (DODFMR), Volume 7B, Chapter 43.  When the spouse’s concurrence is required, the signature indicating concurrence must be corroborated by one or more witnesses.

8.  Public Law 105-85, enacted on 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a 1-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date in which their retired pay started, to withdraw from the SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that she declined SBP coverage is not in question, she has failed to show through the evidence submitted with her application and the evidence of record that such was the case.
2.  Officials at DFAS indicate that no election was received and the applicant has not provided her copy of the DD Form 2656 she signed, which is customarily given to the individual Soldier.

3.  Two 2 years after her retirement she petitions this Board for discontinuance of the SBP and reimbursement of all premiums paid; however, she provides little or no evidence to support her contentions and no evidence to show that she previously attempted to correct the supposed error.

4.  Therefore, absent evidence to support her contention that she opted not to participate in the SBP and that she was unjustly enrolled, there appears to be no basis to grant her request to terminate her SBP participation and refund premiums already paid.

5.  However, since the applicant has provided a notarized statement from her spouse within her 2-year anniversary of retirement, it would be appropriate to allow her to exercise her option to disenroll from the SBP without a refund of premiums already paid.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the applicant exercised her option under Public Law 105-85 to disenroll from the SBP on 29 March 2011 and her disenrollment was approved in a timely manner.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends 


denial of so much of the application that pertains to disenrollment from the SBP with a refund of all premiums paid to date.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100021138



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100021138



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011716

    Original file (20080011716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with his spouse's concurrence. By doing so, he also acknowledged he had been counseled that he can terminate SBP participation, with his spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. Completion of Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of DD Form 2656 is required when a service member is married and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019724

    Original file (20140019724.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a letter of consent from his spouse requesting termination of her SBP coverage based on the applicant's 100-percent disability rating granted by the VA which entitled her to receive DIC upon the death of her husband. The evidence of record shows that the applicant elected to participate in SBP prior to his retirement on 1 October 2012. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * amending his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013449

    Original file (20120013449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant, L.M.J., the widow and second wife of a deceased retired former service member (FSM), requests reimbursement of Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) premiums that were paid and any necessary corrections that are required to the FSM's records. The response stated: a. the FSM elected to participate in the SBP on 1 October 1973 and elected spouse and child coverage; b. SBP premiums were deducted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022350

    Original file (20120022350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the date she signed was after the date of her spouse's signature on the Spouse SBP Election Concurrence Statement. By law, her spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date she made this election but prior to the date of her retirement. Therefore, in the interest of equity, the applicant's records should be corrected to show she elected not to participate in the SBP with her spouse's concurrence and reimbursing her for any excess SBP premiums paid.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007588

    Original file (20100007588.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states upon the FSM's retirement on 30 November 1996 he elected SBP coverage. On 2 March 1999, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656-2 in which he elected to terminate SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM's DD Form 2656-2, dated 2 March 1999 was invalid; b. showing the FSM's continued enrollment in the SBP for "spouse only" coverage; and c. paying the applicant the SBP annuity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018041

    Original file (20080018041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ABCMR analyst of record telephonically contacted the DFAS Retired Pay Office on 23 January 2009, which confirmed that the DD Form 2656, dated 10 July 2008 was not authenticated by the spouse on or after the date the applicant made his election. In a notarized statement, dated 27 January 2009, the applicant's spouse indicated that she had previously agreed with her husband's decision to not participate in the SBP and that she previously signed the one form provided by the Fort Drum, NY,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010623

    Original file (20110010623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was placed on the Retired List in the rank of LTC on 10 February 2011, her 60th birthday. On 14 February 2011, she completed a DD Form 2656 wherein she indicated she was married. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007077

    Original file (20090007077.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 wherein she elected, in the presence of an RSO counselor, to participate in the SBP, spouse coverage, based on the full amount. On 1 December 2008, shortly before her husband deployed again, the applicant and her husband appeared before a notary public and executed the SBP termination request (DD Form 2656-6). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012267

    Original file (20110012267.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement on 31 December 2010, the applicant and his wife elected to decline participation in the SBP with a duly witnessed and notarized DD Form 2656, dated 21 December 2010. In the interest of equity and justice, his records should be corrected to show he elected not to participate in the SBP with his spouse's concurrence prior to the date of his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019285

    Original file (20140019285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 August 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140019285 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 27 March 2014, the retirement service office (RSO) at Fort Knox dispatched a certified letter by mail to the applicant’s spouse along with a Spouse SBP Concurrence Statement and instructions to complete and return it no later than 1 September 2014. The statement provided by the applicant’s spouse indicates he returned the Spouse SBP Concurrence Statement in April 2014...