Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021086
Original file (20100021086.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100021086


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests promotion reconsideration to captain (CPT).

2.  The applicant states he was considered for promotion by the 2009 Department of the Army (DA) Reserve Components (RC) CPT Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Selection Board.  He was not selected because his initial officer evaluation report (OER) was not submitted in time for consideration by the board.  Also, he appeared before the promotion board after just 5 months of service because he received 2 years of constructive service credit prior to appointment.  Finally, he was unable to attend the officer basic course in the short time between his appointment and the promotion board, rendering him educationally unqualified.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report)
* Army Achievement Medal Certificate and orders
* U.S. Army Human Resources Command web site printout on promotion boards
* University of Pittsburgh Undergraduate Academic Transcript
* Bachelor of Science Degree in Pharmacy
* Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Command, memorandum, dated 10 June 2010, subject:  Options Upon Nonselection for Promotion after Second Consideration



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is a pharmacist.  He was appointed as a first lieutenant, U.S. Army Reserve, on 27 March 2008 and was assigned to the 339th Combat Support Hospital, Coraopolis, PA.

2.  On 1 October 2009, he received active duty orders directing him to report to the U.S. Army Medical Department Activity, Fort Leonard Wood, MO, on 13 October 2009 for 165 days of active duty in support of contingency operations.

3.  The applicant's records were considered by the 2009 DA RC CPT AMEDD Selection Board and he was not selected for promotion.  The reason for his nonselection is not known.

4.  The applicant's records went before the 2010 DA RC CPT AMEDD Selection Board.  He was again denied promotion and in a memorandum, dated 10 June 2010, was notified he must separate not later than the first day of the seventh month following the President's approval of the selection board results.

5.  Orders 10-252-00028, Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Command, Fort McPherson, GA, dated 9 September 2010, discharged the applicant effective 1 November 2010.  However, these orders were revoked by 
Orders 10-356-00024, Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Command, Fort McPherson, GA, dated 22 December 2010.

6.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Special Actions Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY, which states the applicant was considered but not selected by the 2009 DA RC CPT AMEDD Selection Board.  The opinion also states:

	a.  Military education was not a requirement for selection for promotion for Medical Services Branch officers; therefore, his nonselection was not due to education.  However, selection boards are not required by statute to disclose reasons for nonselection; therefore, his reason(s) for nonselection are not known.  Also, his first OER was not rendered prior to the convening of the selection board and, thus, was not considered.

	b.  The applicant's file revealed he was not eligible for consideration by the 2009 board because he had not continuously performed Reserve Active Status List service during the 1-year period ending on the convening date of the promotion board (7 January 2009).

	c.  Because he was not eligible for consideration by the 2009 Selection Board, special consideration is not applicable and the opinion recommended disapproval.  The applicant was provided an opportunity to respond to the advisory opinion, but did not do so.

7.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officer Other Than General Officers) prescribes the policies and procedures for promotion of Reserve officers.  This regulation specifies that promotion reconsideration by a special selection board may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error which existed in the records at the time of consideration.  Material error in this context is one or more errors of such a nature that, in the judgment of the reviewing official (or body), it caused an individual's non-selection by a promotion board and that had such error(s) been corrected at the time the individual was considered, a reasonable chance would have resulted that the individual would have been recommended for promotion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration for promotion to CPT by a special selection board using the 2009 selection board's criteria.

2.  The applicant was not even eligible for promotion consideration by the 2009 selection board; therefore, his request for a special selection board using the 2009 selection board's criteria is improper.  It is noted the U.S. Army Reserve Command voided his discharge due to being a two-time nonselect for promotion.  It appears this was done because, since he was not eligible for consideration by the 2009 board, his nonselection by the 2010 board was only his first passover.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ___X____DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100021086



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100021086



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016265

    Original file (20130016265.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was a two-time non-select for promotion to CPT and discharged from the USAR * his officer evaluation reports (OER) were not scanned into his records for promotion consideration * his unit had the responsibility to place the OERs in his military records * he was granted an SSB for the missing OERs, but he was discharged prior to the board meeting * he is in an Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) program and he would like reinstatement to facilitate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006954

    Original file (20140006954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She stated that she also had two out of six years of OERs that rated her best qualified for promotion. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to CPT and extension in the USAR to complete 20 years of service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was passed over for promotion to CPT by the FY 2011, 2012, and 2013, RC, CPT, AMEDD Promotion Selection Boards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002366

    Original file (20120002366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests the applicant's record be corrected by: a. adding the applicant's Bachelor of Science in Nursing; DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 22 March 2010; and official photograph to her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF); and b. placing her corrected record before a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion consideration to captain under the criteria of the 2010 and 2011 Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB). The advisory official further...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022165

    Original file (20100022165.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states that a promotion reconsideration board will consider the record of the officer as it should have been considered by the original board. The available evidence shows that at the time the 2009 AMEDD CPT RCSB convened the applicant's OMPF contained a material error in the form of a missing OER. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. submitting the applicant’s records to a duly constituted SSB for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024185

    Original file (20100024185.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence shows that, due to no fault of the applicant, his OER with a through date of 7 September 2009 was not completed in time and was not presented to the FY10 AMEDD promotion board for consideration. The omission of this OER may have caused the applicant to not to be selected for promotion to captain for a second time resulting in his discharged from the USAR. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015946

    Original file (20130015946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    a. Paragraph 2-2 states to qualify for selection, commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers) must complete the military educational requirements in table 2-2 not later than the day before the selection board convene date. The Fiscal Year 2013 promotion board convened on 27 November 2012 and considered her non-educationally qualified and she was again not selected for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000875

    Original file (20140000875.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show his DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report (OER)) for the rating period 29 May 2009 through 28 May 2010 was filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) prior to 8 January 2013, the date the Fiscal Year 2013 (FY13) Lieutenant Colonel (LTC), Army Promotion List (APL), Competitive Categories, Promotion Selection Board Selection Board convened. On 13 November 2013, his request for an SSB was denied based on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003223

    Original file (20150003223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    But even if his records were coded educationally qualified for civilian education, with documents, there is no guarantee that he would have been selected for promotion. But even if his records were coded educationally qualified for civilian education, with documents, there is no guarantee that he would have been selected for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. submitting his record to a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026100

    Original file (20100026100.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, * education waivers with consecutive promotion corrections due to the findings of Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR20070001144, dated 2 August 2007 * a 4-year extension of his mandatory removal date (MRD) to allow him to qualify for a 20-year nonregular retirement 2. On 2 August 2007, the ABCMR granted his request for correction of his records as follows: * determined his 19 April 1996 DA Form 5074-1-R was incorrect *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010603

    Original file (20130010603.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was not promoted despite meeting the requirements for promotion; he has been an O-2 [first lieutenant (1LT)] for 4 years and 7 months * he was to be promoted via unit vacancy after completing BOLC in 2011, but this did not happen, and for no apparent reason * he was not given a reasonable answer as to why he was not promoted during that time * in February 2012, he spoke with the commander of Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), Texas Medical Command...