Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024185
Original file (20100024185.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024185 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests promotion reconsideration to captain (CPT)/O-3 under the fiscal year 2010 (FY10) criteria.

2.  The applicant states an Officer Evaluation Report (OER) recommending promotion to CPT was not submitted on time giving the board insufficient data to consider.  He contends that he was mobilized on 11 December 2009 and the submission deadline for the promotion board was 15 December 2009.  His raters at the time were unable to complete the OER before the deadline.  Major S had just come back from Iraq and her computer was unable to sign the form.  Lieutenant Colonel C had moved to be with a family member and worked full time.  They were helpful in preparing the OER and he understands how busy they were but the OER was not completed in time for the board, resulting in him being discharged instead of promoted.

3.  The applicant provides an email message, OERs for the periods 8 September 2008 to 7 September 2009 and 8 September - 10 December 2009, and active duty orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After having had prior enlisted service in the Army National Guard (ARNG), the applicant was appointed a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of first lieutenant, Army Nurse Corps, on 10 August 2006.  He was ordered to and entered active duty on 11 December 2009.

2.  In a memorandum dated 10 June 2010, he was informed by the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Command that he had been considered twice for promotion to the next higher grade by the Army Reserve Components Selection Board but not selected.  He was also informed his transition from an active status was mandatory.

3.  He was released from active duty on 13 December 2010 and honorably discharged from the USAR on 5 April 2011.

4.  In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Chief, Officer Promotions and Special Actions.  The opinion stated that the applicant's OER with a through date of 7 September 2009 should have been seen by the FY10 CPT Army Medical Department (AMEDD) board.  However, it was not completed in a timely manner by his rating chain.  Had the OER been submitted by the cutoff date, it would have been included in the promotion file and seen by the selection panel.  The opinion also stated that because of this omission, the applicant is authorized a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the FY10 CPT AMEDD promotion board.  The opinion pointed out that because he is now in a discharge status, the SSB would have to come through, and at the direction of, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.

5.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comments and/or rebuttal.  He responded and pointed out that a change of rater OER for the period 8 September - 10 December 2009 was also submitted late and should also be provided to the promotion board.  (This OER is filed in his Official Military Personnel File.(

6.  Army Regulation 135-155 (ARNG and USAR Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other than General Officers), paragraph 3-19a states officers and warrant officers who have either failed of selection for promotion, or who were erroneously not considered for promotion through administrative error may be reconsidered for promotion by either a Promotion Advisory Board or an SSB, as appropriate.

7.  Paragraph 3-19e of the above regulation states Commander, Human Resources Command, Office of Promotions, may find that a "material error" caused the nonselection of an officer by a promotion board.  That agency must first determine that there is a fair risk that one or more of the following circumstances were responsible - (3) One or more of the evaluation reports that should have been seen by a board (based on the announced cut-off date) were missing from an officer's Official Military Personnel File.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he should be reconsidered for promotion to captain CPT under the fiscal year 2010 (FY10) criteria has been carefully considered. 

2.  Evidence shows that, due to no fault of the applicant, his OER with a through date of 7 September 2009 was not completed in time and was not presented to the FY10 AMEDD promotion board for consideration.  The omission of this OER may have caused the applicant to not to be selected for promotion to captain for a second time resulting in his discharged from the USAR.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be considered by an SSB under the criteria of the FY10 CPT AMEDD promotion selection board

BOARD VOTE:

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  submitting his records to a duly-constituted Special Selection Board for reconsideration for promotion to Captain under the Fiscal Year 2010 criteria;

	b.  if he is selected for promotion his records be further corrected by:

		(1)  promoting him to Captain and assigning the appropriate date of rank; and

		(2)  showing he was reinstated to his previous active Reserve status, with constructive service, pay and award of appropriate (i.e., 15 membership and 35 inactive duty training) retirement points.


	c.  auditing his military pay records and paying him any monies due him as a result of these corrections; or

	d.  notifying him, if he is not selected.



      
      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024185



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024185



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016265

    Original file (20130016265.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was a two-time non-select for promotion to CPT and discharged from the USAR * his officer evaluation reports (OER) were not scanned into his records for promotion consideration * his unit had the responsibility to place the OERs in his military records * he was granted an SSB for the missing OERs, but he was discharged prior to the board meeting * he is in an Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) program and he would like reinstatement to facilitate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022165

    Original file (20100022165.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states that a promotion reconsideration board will consider the record of the officer as it should have been considered by the original board. The available evidence shows that at the time the 2009 AMEDD CPT RCSB convened the applicant's OMPF contained a material error in the form of a missing OER. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. submitting the applicantÂ’s records to a duly constituted SSB for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020505

    Original file (20110020505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states the applicant's promotion board file should be corrected and submitted to an SSB. Counsel states the Army Human Recourses Command unfairly denied the applicant's request for reconsideration and he is requesting that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) assistance in amending the errors and injustice in the applicant's case. It states an SSB may be convened to consider or reconsider commissioned officers for promotion when Headquarters, Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022679

    Original file (20120022679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records reviewed by the Department of the Army Selection Board did not indicate he had completed the required civilian and/or military education by the day before the date the board convened on 3 November 2009. b. This memorandum states Reserve officers in the grade of first lieutenant not selected for promotion are considered again by a selection board approximately 1 year later. He provides an email from an official at Department of the Army Promotions, HRC, dated 22 October 2012,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018274

    Original file (20110018274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 135-155 (Army National Guard and USAR Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) states officers who have failed to be selected for promotion may be reconsidered for promotion by either a promotion advisory board or a special selection board, as appropriate. He states he was told the absence of an OER was the reason he was not selected for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002366

    Original file (20120002366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests the applicant's record be corrected by: a. adding the applicant's Bachelor of Science in Nursing; DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 22 March 2010; and official photograph to her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF); and b. placing her corrected record before a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion consideration to captain under the criteria of the 2010 and 2011 Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB). The advisory official further...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006954

    Original file (20140006954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She stated that she also had two out of six years of OERs that rated her best qualified for promotion. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to CPT and extension in the USAR to complete 20 years of service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was passed over for promotion to CPT by the FY 2011, 2012, and 2013, RC, CPT, AMEDD Promotion Selection Boards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015946

    Original file (20130015946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    a. Paragraph 2-2 states to qualify for selection, commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers) must complete the military educational requirements in table 2-2 not later than the day before the selection board convene date. The Fiscal Year 2013 promotion board convened on 27 November 2012 and considered her non-educationally qualified and she was again not selected for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015111

    Original file (20130015111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF BOARD DATE: 10 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130015111 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) in the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) from 28 March 2013 to 1 September 2010. Having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed as a Regular Army Medical Services (MS) officer and executed an Oath of Office on 2 August 2007.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018890

    Original file (20100018890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An officer who does not complete the USUHS program is added to the Active Duty List (ADL) as a 2LT with a DOR of the date of disenrollment unless they have prior creditable commissioned service time before they entered the USUHS program. Accordingly, he should have been promoted to 1LT on 10 December 2008, the date he was academically disenrolled from the USUHS, and promoted to CPT effective 10 July 2010. The evidence of record shows he entered active duty as a student on 26 May 2007.