Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021033
Original file (20100021033.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		


		BOARD DATE:	 3 March 2011 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100021033 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her name be changed to Irene with no middle name on her official military records. 

2.  The applicant states:

* She has been a naturalized U.S. citizen since 15 September 1976
* Her naturalization certificate contains her official name change from Stella Irene to Irene with no middle name 
* When she entered the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 30 August 1982 to be processed her recruiting officer sent a notarized statement to the Office of the Surgeon General indicating her name had been changed from Stella Irene to Irene
* All forms for her commissioning into the USAR contained her corrected name of Irene with no middle name
* The USAR never changed their records to reflect that she dropped her first name and adopted her middle name of Irene as her first name
* Defense Finance and Accounting Service just sent her forms to fill out to start collecting retirement pay on her 60th birthday (31 August 2012)    







3.  The applicant provides:

* Promotion orders, dated 28 June 1994
* Notarized letter from a Judge Advocate General (JAG) officer at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY
* Her passport
* Social Security card

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on 31 August 1952.  Her DA Form 71 (Oath of Office - Military Personnel) and appointment document, dated 30 August 1982, show her name as Irene with no middle name.  She was appointed a second lieutenant in the USAR on 30 August 1982.  She was discharged from the USAR on 
21 August 2000 in the rank of major and placed in the Retired Reserve effective 22 August 2000.  

3.  Her service personnel records contain both names, Stella Irene and Irene with no middle name.     

4.  The applicant provided a letter, dated 3 August 2010, from a JAG officer at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY.  He confirms he saw the original Certificate of Naturalization #10550985, dated 15 September 1976, for the applicant and her name was duly changed by Decree of Court from Stella Irene to Irene on 15 September 1976.  She also provided various forms of identification which show her first name as Irene with no middle name.     





DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The letter provided by the JAG officer at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY, which confirms he saw the original Certificate of Naturalization #10550985, dated 15 September 1976, for the applicant and her name was duly changed by a Decree of Court from Stella Irene to Irene on 15 September 1976 is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to correct her military records to show her name as Irene with no middle name.     

BOARD VOTE:

___x___  ___x_____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting her military records to show her name as Irene with no middle name.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100021033



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100021033



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001419

    Original file (20120001419.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of his divorce. His spouse did not authenticate this form as required by law when a member is married and elects children-only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he elected SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075732C070403

    Original file (2002075732C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated 8 April 1983, the Superintendent informed the applicant that, as a result of a hearing by an IO on 17 January 1983, he was found deficient in conduct for receiving 160 demerits for the period 1 June 1982 through 30 November 1982. The Board notes that the applicant's Officer Record Brief shows his BASD as 13 July 1983. The Board cannot determine from the available records if this is his correct PEBD (the evidence of record shows he was assigned to the USAR effective 22 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003004

    Original file (20120003004.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his: * DD Form 214 * U.S. Military Academy Academic Transcript, prepared on 14 June 1983 * Officer Record Brief (ORB), dated 20 May 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Line 15a of his DD Form 214 has an X in the "NO" block. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing item 15a of his DD Form 214 by: * deleting the X in the "NO" block * entering an X in the "YES"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013035

    Original file (20130013035.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that shows within 1 year of the divorce decree the applicant or his former spouse requested his SBP election be changed from spouse to former spouse based on the settlement agreement. Counsel provides a notarized affidavit wherein the applicant's spouse Frances stated she consented to the designation of the applicant's former spouse Laurie as the "former spouse" beneficiary for his SBP, pursuant to the settlement agreement that was incorporated into the applicant's and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010299

    Original file (20110010299.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage within 1 year of his divorce. The applicant states: * she and the FSM were married on 16 February 1969 and divorced on 24 March 1990 * their final judgment and divorce decree stipulated that she was to receive 40 percent of the FSM's military retirement and remain the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020161

    Original file (20110020161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the military records of her former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. However, there was no evidence that he had divorced or made a former spouse election under SBP. Once they divorced she was no longer a beneficiary unless the FSM or the applicant submitted a former spouse election to DFAS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016658

    Original file (20080016658.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he elected SBP coverage when he retired in 1996. While deployed to Iraq, the applicant discovered the beneficiary for his military retirement pay was his ex-wife. In the process he made the election to resume existing coverage for his new wife instead of making a decision to cancel his SBP coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011166

    Original file (20080011166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she disagrees with the previous decision by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), and that she has obtained a "clarification order" to her divorce decree with the FSM that has been signed and notarized by the Fort McPherson, Georgia Staff Judge Advocate office which clarifies all of her entitlements as a former spouse of 20 years. The applicant provided a notarized "clarification order," dated 20 May 2008, which essentially stated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023390

    Original file (20110023390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders 343-072 (Retired Reserve) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 23B (Army National Guard (ARNG) Retirement Points History Statement) * Letters from her divorce attorney * Superior Court of the State of New York, County of Orange, Court Order – Acceptance for Processing and Amended Court Order – Acceptable for Processing * Correspondence with and from DFAS * DD Form 2656-10 (SBP/RCSBP Request for Deemed Election) * Copies of certified mail receipts * Letter from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011853

    Original file (20100011853.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 25 July 2009, the applicant and her spouse, who is also retired from the USAR, completed a DD Form 2656 (April 2006 version) in which they elected to decline participation in the SBP. A staff member of the Board also contacted the applicant’s spouse regarding the notarized election form and he informed the staff member that he and his spouse (the applicant) did decline participation in the SBP and that they did so as well when he retired from the USAR in February 2008. Therefore, as a...