Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020988
Original file (20100020988.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020988 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election be changed from spouse to former spouse coverage.  

2.  He states he:

* was divorced on 1 May 2008
* wasn’t aware that there would be a change in his spouse’s SBP status 
* and spouse went to Fort Drum Personnel Center to update his records after their divorce
* updated everything, but the SBP program was never discussed
* found out recently he should have made a change from spouse to former spouse coverage

3.  He provides:

* Divorce decree
* DD Form 2656-1 (SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage)
* DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 June 1973.  He was married on 19 August 1977.  

2.  On 17 August 1992, he completed a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) and elected to participate in the SBP for spouse coverage at a reduced amount.  

3.  At the completion of 20 years of service, he retired from active service on 30 June 1993.  

4.  He was divorced on 1 May 2008.  The divorce decree stated that he and his spouse entered a written agreement on 3 January 2008; agreement is not available.  The SBP is not mentioned in the divorce decree.  

5.  On 6 August 2010, he submitted a DD Form 2656-6 and DD Form 2656-1 to change his SBP spouse coverage to former spouse coverage.  The DD Form 2656-1 indicates he was not married as of the date it was signed.  

6.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name.

7.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.  

8.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions in regard to changing his SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse are acknowledged and determined to have merit.  

2.  He retired on 30 June 1993 and elected to enroll in the SBP for spouse coverage at a reduced amount.  He was married to his former spouse at that time.

3.  He divorced on 1 May 2008.  
4.  His contention that he recently found out he should have made a change from spouse to former spouse coverage is supported by the fact that he submitted a DD Form 2656-6 and DD Form 2656-1 on 6 August 2010 to change his SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage.  Further, since it appears he has not remarried there is no one with a superior vested interest in spouse SBP.  

5.  Considering there is evidence to show it is the applicant’s intent to provide SBP coverage for his former spouse, it would be equitable to correct his records to show he made a written request to change his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage within the time frame provided by law.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he had requested his SBP coverage be changed from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage in a timely manner.  




      _______ _ X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020988





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020988



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010076

    Original file (20080010076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the FSM, while still married to the applicant, elected SBP spouse coverage at a reduced amount, prior to his retirement. After retirement, he and the applicant were divorced. Their divorce decree did not obligate the FSM to change SBP coverage from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage; nevertheless, he continued to pay SBP premiums after the divorce and until his death, a period of nearly 5 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015433

    Original file (20090015433.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submitted a copy of a DA Form 2656-1, dated 21 July 2008, showing he requested a change in election coverage due to divorce from spouse to former spouse. He states he provided DFAS with a copy of his divorce decree and to date has not remarried; however, DFAS maintains the applicant did not notify them within 1 year of the divorce of his election for former spouse coverage as required by the SBP statute. There is sufficient evidence to show that the applicant's intent was to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001342

    Original file (20140001342.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage within 1 year of his divorce. The evidence of record shows the applicant elected SBP spouse and children coverage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he elected SBP coverage for former spouse within one year of his divorce on 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011142

    Original file (20070011142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. When the FSM and the applicant divorced in April 2000, the court ordered that the FSM retain the applicant as his SBP beneficiary and even required that the applicant pay for the SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011142

    Original file (20070011142.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 August 2007, the FSM’s widow signed an affidavit noting that she and the FSM had been married for less than one year and had no children and that she consented to the applicant’s request to change the FSM’s SBP election to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014991

    Original file (20070014991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for former spouse coverage. The applicant provides a copy of a DD Form 2656-1 (SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage); her and the FSM’s Record of Divorce; and her and the FSM’s divorce decree. On 7 June 2006, the FSM submitted a DD Form 2656-1 and elected to enroll in the SBP for former spouse coverage due...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011908

    Original file (20140011908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 March 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140011908 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage within 1 year of their divorce. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021682

    Original file (20130021682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired service member (RSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U.S. Code,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011084

    Original file (20140011084.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a correction of the record of her deceased former spouse, a retired former service member (FSM), to show that he made an election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The evidence of record does not support the applicant’s request for correction of FSM's record to show that he made a voluntary election for former spouse coverage under the SBP. When the applicant and FSM divorced, there was no former spouse provision in their divorce...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015423

    Original file (20080015423.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time of the FSM's retirement he elected spouse only coverage under the SBP. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. Although there is no evidence to show that either the FSM or the applicant requested that his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse coverage within the...