Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020691
Original file (20100020691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  21 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020691 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 26 August 2006, and all related documents be removed from the performance section of his official military personnel file (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states:

* He was charged with DUI [driving under the influence] in 2006 as a private and subsequently received an Article 15
* According to all the records he read, his UCMJ [Uniform Code of Military Justice] action should have been filed in the restricted section of his OMPF
* The UCMJ action is showing up in both the restricted and performance sections of his OMPF

3.  The applicant provides:

* Enlisted Record Brief
* GOMOR and related documents






CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the rank of staff sergeant.

2.  On 25 August 2006, the applicant received a GOMOR for driving while intoxicated.  The GOMOR states "This is an administrative reprimand imposed under the provisions of AR [Army Regulation] 600-37 and not as punishment under UCMJ, Article 15."     
  
3.  On 14 September 2006, the commanding general directed the GOMOR with supporting documentation be filed permanently in the applicant’s OMPF.

4.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant received an Article 15 for DUI or driving while intoxicated.

5.  A review of the performance and restricted sections of the applicant's OMPF on the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System revealed a copy of the GOMOR and related documents.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) prescribes the policies governing the OMPF, the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records.  Paragraph 2-4 of this regulation states that once a document is placed in the OMPF it becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from that file or moved to another part of the file unless directed by: the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, the DASEB, Army appeals board, Chief of Appeals and Corrections Branch of the Total Army Personnel Command, the OMPF custodian when documents have been improperly filed, Total Army Personnel Command (TAPC-PDO-PO) as an exception, Chief of the Appeals Branch of the Army Reserve Personnel Center and Chief of the Appeals Branch of the National Guard Personnel Center.

7.  Table 2 of Army Regulation 600-8-104 states, in pertinent part, that administrative letters of reprimand will be filed in the performance section of the OMPF.

8.  Army Regulation 600-37 (Unfavorable Information) prescribes policies and procedures regarding unfavorable information considered for inclusion in official personnel files.  Chapter 3 covers unfavorable information in official personnel files.  Paragraph 3-4 applies to filing of nonpunitive administrative letters of reprimand or censure in official personnel files.  Paragraph 3-4(b) provides for filing in the OMPF.  It states that a letter, regardless of the issuing authority, may be filed in the OMPF maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM), or the proper State 
Adjutant General (for Army National Guard Personnel) only upon the order of a general officer (to include one frocked to the rank of brigadier general) senior to the recipient by direction of an officer having general court-martial jurisdiction over the individual.  Letters filed in the OMPF will be filed on the performance portion.  The direction for filing in the OMPF will be contained in an endorsement or addendum to the letter.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant contends he received an Article 15 for DUI, records show he received an administrative reprimand for driving while intoxicated under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-37 and not as punishment under UCMJ, Article 15.

2.  The applicant contends the GOMOR should have been filed in the restricted section of his OMPF.  However, the commanding general directed the GOMOR with supporting documentation be filed permanently in the applicant’s OMPF.

3.  The governing regulation states administrative letters of reprimand will be filed in the performance section of the OMPF.   

4.  There is no evidence the GOMOR was improperly imposed.  The GOMOR was properly filed in the performance section of the applicant's OMPF.  Based on the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020691





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020691



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019427

    Original file (20110019427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He acknowledged receipt of the GOMOR on 7 February 2006 and submitted a statement on 8 February 2006 wherein he requested the GOMOR be filed in the restricted section of his OMPF. On 19 July 2008, the applicant's senior commander, a brigadier general, stated, "after review of the nature of the misconduct as well as the applicant's status as a senior NCO with over 20 years of total military service," he directed filing the following documents in the applicant's OMPF: * GOMOR, dated 15 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018834.

    Original file (20080018834..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 1 September 2006, be transferred from the performance section to the restricted section of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Paragraph 2-4 of this regulation states that once a document is placed in the Official Military Personnel File it becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from that file or moved to another part of the file unless directed by: the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015360

    Original file (20100015360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 May 2006, the applicant's imposing CG approved the permanent filing of the GOMOR in his OMPF with review of the decision in 1 year following a request from the applicant and letters on his behalf from his new chain of command. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) prescribes the policies governing the OMPF, the military personnel records jacket, the career management individual file, and the Army Personnel Qualification Record. After...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011504

    Original file (20100011504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his non-selection for promotion to major was because of the GOMOR's in the performance section of his OMPF. The applicant provides: * letter to President of Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) * correspondence from Chief, Congressional and Special Actions, Army Review Boards Agency * correspondence from Chief, Promotions, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Alexandria, Virginia * undated endorsement from Commanding General, Headquarters, Third U.S....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018175

    Original file (20080018175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel also requests, if possible, that the applicant be allowed to appear before the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) if the Board will be traveling to or near Texas. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records), Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) provides, in pertinent part, that administrative letters of reprimand, admonitions, and censures of a non-punitive nature, referral correspondence, and member's reply will be filed in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004550C070205

    Original file (20060004550C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Donald Steenfott | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states the GOMOR is a violation of the Fifth Amendment process because it was presented before he was convicted. It notes that decisions for the issuing and filing of unfavorable information in official files will be based on the knowledge and best judgment of the commander.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018863

    Original file (20140018863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 11 May 2012, the applicant requested that the GOMOR be filed in his Military Personnel Records Jacket or completely expunged “as per the imposing official's discretion after seeing supporting documentation.” The applicant stated: a. The letter indicated that in accordance with Army Regulation 600-37, the DASEB will only consider appeals and petitions for active Army, Reserve, and Army National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071763C070403

    Original file (2002071763C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his two Memorandums of Reprimand (MOR) be removed from his Performance (P) fiche, Disciplinary Data Section, and transferred to his Restricted (R) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). APPLICANT STATES : That his two MORs have served their purpose, remained in his record for more than 4 years, and since receiving his MORs his military performance has been nothing but stellar. Paragraph 2-4 of this regulation states that once a document is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019581

    Original file (20110019581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 11 March 2010, from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) or in the alternative, transfer of the GOMOR to the restricted section of his OMPF. A memorandum of reprimand may be filed in a Soldier's OMPF only upon the order of a general officer-level authority and is to be filed in the performance section. The GOMOR was correctly filed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003925

    Original file (20120003925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He stated he was cited for DUI of alcohol.