Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018834.
Original file (20080018834..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  	  5 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018834 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 1 September 2006, be transferred from the performance section to the restricted section of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he has exhausted all means at his level to get the GOMOR transferred from the performance section to the restricted section of his OMPF.  He contends that he presented his case to the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB); however, his request was denied.  He states that the GOMOR is hindering his career progression and is a discriminator at the centralized Department of the Army selection board level.  He points out that he has an exemplary record, that there is no derogatory evidence in his OMPF except for the GOMOR, and that the incident occurred off post and all charges were dismissed.   

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the DASEB proceedings and related documents; a letter, dated 19 March 2007, from a District Attorney; eight Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports (NCOER); two DA Forms 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report); orders for the Bronze Star Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, and the Army Achievement Medal; a copy of his Enlisted Record Brief; a letter, dated 3 October 2008, to the DASEB; and a certificate of achievement in support of his application.          




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 September 1993 and has remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments.  He is currently serving on active duty in the rank of staff sergeant.

2.  On 1 September 2006, the applicant received a GOMOR for driving while intoxicated on 24 June 2006.  The Commanding General directed the GOMOR be filed in the applicant’s OMPF.

3.  The applicant provides a letter, dated 19 March 2007, from the Office of the District Attorney, Parish of Vernon, State of Louisiana which states that the Office of the District Attorney dismissed the driving while intoxicated charge.

4.  On 5 May 2008, the applicant submitted an appeal to the DASEB requesting that the GOMOR be transferred to the restricted section of his OMPF.  

5.  On 10 July 2008, the DASEB denied the applicant’s request.  The DASEB reviewed the single Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report received since the incident and determined that it had laudatory comments and top blocks for potential by the rater and senior rater; the DASEB found no indication of remorse by the applicant, or any reflection on his actions which generated the GOMOR; the DASEB recognized the significant awards and combat service performed by the applicant, but noted those actions occurred prior to the driving while intoxicated incident which generated the GOMOR; and the DASEB did not find sufficient substantial evidence to show that the GOMOR had served its purpose and that it was in the best interest of the Army to have the GOMOR transferred to the applicant’s restricted file.    

6.  A review of the performance section of the applicant’s OMPF on the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) revealed a copy of the 1 September 2006 GOMOR in question.      

7.  In support of his claim, the applicant provides eight NCOERs covering the period from January 2002 to 18 July 2008.  These reports show the applicant was rated "Among the Best" by his rater.  He provides orders for the Bronze Star Medal for exceptionally meritorious achievement during the period 28 March 2003 to 15 November 2003; orders for the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service during the period 30 October 1999 to 30 July 2004; and orders for the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious service during the period 29 January 2007 to 18 February 2007.    


8.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) prescribes the policies governing the OMPF, the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records.  Paragraph 2-4 of this regulation states that once a document is placed in the Official Military Personnel File it becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from that file or moved to another part of the file unless directed by: the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board, Army appeals board, Chief of Appeals and Corrections Branch of the Total Army Personnel Command, the Official Military Personnel File custodian when documents have been improperly filed, Total Army Personnel Command (TAPC-PDO-PO) as an exception, Chief of the Appeals Branch of the Army Reserve Personnel Center and Chief of the Appeals Branch of the National Guard Personnel Center.

9.  Table 2 of Army Regulation 600-8-104 states, in pertinent part, that administrative letters of reprimand will be filed in the performance section of the OMPF.

10.  Army Regulation 600-37 (Unfavorable Information) prescribes policies and procedures regarding unfavorable information considered for inclusion in official personnel files.  Chapter 3 covers unfavorable information in official personnel files.  Paragraph 3-4 applies to filing of nonpunitive administrative letters of reprimand or censure in official personnel files.  Paragraph 3-4(b) provides for filing in the OMPF.  It states that a letter, regardless of the issuing authority may be filed in the OMPF maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM), or the proper State Adjutant General (for Army National Guard Personnel) only upon the order of a general officer (to include one frocked to the rank of brigadier general) senior to the recipient by direction of an officer having general court-martial jurisdiction over the individual.  Letters filed in the OMPF will be filed on the performance portion.  The direction for filing in the OMPF will be contained in an endorsement or addendum to the letter.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant contends that the GOMOR is hindering his career progression and is a discriminator at the centralized Department of the Army selection board level, the governing regulation states that administrative letters of reprimand will be filed in the performance section of the OMPF.


  

2.  There is no evidence that the GOMOR was improperly imposed.  The 
1 September 2006 GOMOR was properly filed in the performance section of the applicant’s OMPF.  

3.  It appears the applicant’s performance has been without further incident since his GOMOR.  However, driving while intoxicated (consumption of alcohol), which led to the GOMOR, is considered to be extremely serious and the offense occurred less than three years ago.  Therefore, it is inappropriate to transfer the GOMOR to his restriction section of his OMPF at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018834



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018834



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080743C070215

    Original file (2002080743C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    When the police officer botched the first test the applicant asked that Captain (CPT) G____, who was known to already be in the building, be allowed to witness the test, but the police officer recorded the incident as a refusal. He also recommends that the GOMOR be removed. There is no evidence that the applicant was ever charged with refusing to take a breath test.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007119

    Original file (20140007119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was subsequently charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI) and refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test, which resulted in him receiving the GOMOR at issue here. The GOMOR states, in part: You are hereby reprimanded for driving while intoxicated. You were then charged with driving while intoxicated.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074333C070403

    Original file (2002074333C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That a general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR), dated 18 July 2000, be transferred to the restricted portion (R-Fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). On 2 May 2002, the ABCMR received the applicant's request for correction of his records, dated 23 March 2002. The Commanding General, after reviewing the applicant’s request to have the GOMOR filed in his R-fiche, deemed it appropriate to file the memorandum on the performance portion of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073126C070403

    Original file (2002073126C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: He provides three letters of support dated 4 March, 18 April, and 23 April 2002; the court document showing his case was dismissed without prejudice; the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) packet; and his HQDA QMP bar to reenlistment appeal packet as supporting evidence. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by transferring the GOMOR issued to the applicant on 15 January 1997,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009267C070206

    Original file (20050009267C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that a memorandum of reprimand imposed by a general officer (GOMOR) and associated documents be expunged from the restricted portion of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant acknowledged the GOMOR and provided a rebuttal in which he maintained that he was not intoxicated under German law because his blood alcohol content (BAC) was only .054 at 0036 hours and .060 at 0038 hours and that German law provided that a BAC of .080 was considered evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004838

    Original file (20140004838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, on 4 September 2012, [Applicant] received a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand, which was filed in his OMPF, based on his arrest at FT. [sic] Bragg on 14 June 2012 for failing to maintain his lane and refusal to submit to a breathalyzer resulting in a charge of driving while intoxicated. On 21 September 2012, in a memorandum for his senior rater, the applicant stated: In response to the Officer Evaluation Report Referral, I respectfully submit the following: On 15 June 2012 I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084460C070212

    Original file (2003084460C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant also enlisted the services of an attorney who submitted a letter to his CG dated 29 April 1999, requesting that the GOMOR be filed locally. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016316

    Original file (20080016316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 January 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080016316 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 17 December 1992, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). A memorandum of reprimand may be filed in a Soldier's OMPF only upon the order of a general officer level authority and are to be filed in the performance section.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003322

    Original file (20120003322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) be removed from his record or transferred to the restricted portion of his official military personnel file (OMPF). A memorandum of reprimand may be filed in a Soldier's OMPF only upon the order of a general officer-level authority and is to be filed in the performance section. The available records do not show evidence of error or injustice in the GOMOR the applicant received or the decision to file the GOMOR in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003463

    Original file (20140003463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of a general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR), dated 1 October 2009, from the restricted section of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File). He could now begin the process of trying to correct his military records because he now had evidence to prove that he had not been DUI or driving while intoxicated and the blood alcohol level of .133 or higher did not match with all the other facts of...