Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020655
Original file (20100020655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  10 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020655 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 21 July 1980 be corrected to show he entered active duty on 22 June 1972, not 22 June 1977, and that he entered active duty at Fort Polk, Louisiana, not Fort Gordon, Georgia.

2.  The applicant states he was in advanced individual training for the Wire Systems Installer Operator Course in 1972.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Memphis, Tennessee, on 13 July 1972.  He completed basic training at Fort Polk, Louisiana, and advanced individual training at Fort Gordon, Georgia.  He was transferred to Fort Huachuca, Arizona, for his first duty assignment.

3.  On 30 July 1974, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment and he was issued a DD Form 214 covering his 2 years and 18 days of active service.

4.  On 31 July 1974, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years and assignment to Fort Gordon, Georgia.  He was transferred to Fort Gordon on 24 August 1974.

5.  On 21 June 1977, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment and was issued a DD Form 214 to reflect that he had served 4 years, 11 months and 9 days of total active service.

6.  On 22 June 1977, he reenlisted at Fort Gordon for a period of 3 years and assignment to Korea.  He served his 1 year tour in Korea and was transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado where he remained until he was honorably discharged due to completion of required service.  He had served 8 years and 9 days of total active service.

7.  He was issued a DD Form 214 which shows in block 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) that he entered this period of active duty on 22 June 1977.  In block 12c (Net Active Service This Period) it shows he completed 3 years and 1 month of net active service this period.  In block 12d (Total Prior Active Service) it shows that he completed 4 years, 11 months, and 9 days of total prior active service.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect active service that is performed during the period covered by the DD Form 214.  However, effective 1 October 1979, this regulation was changed to eliminate the issuance of a DD Form 214 for immediate reenlistments.  A break in service in excess of 24 hours requires that a DD Form 214 be issued from that point and continues presently.  Prior periods of service reflected on previously-issued DD Forms 214 will be reflected in the proper blocks designated for prior active and inactive service.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect he entered active duty at Fort Polk in 1972 has been noted and is found to lack merit.

2.  While the applicant did enter active duty in Memphis, Tennessee, on 13 July 1972, he was issued a DD Form 214 to properly reflect his service during each period of enlistment and reenlistment.  

3.  The DD Form 214 issued for his last period of service properly reflects he entered his last period of service at Fort Gordon on 22 June 1777 and also reflects all of his prior active service.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show otherwise, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

4.  A cop of the applicant's first two DD Forms 214 will be provided to him for use/information.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  __x_____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020655



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020655



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010556C070208

    Original file (20040010556C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect the correct information in items 19a through 28 and that his end of tour award be added to his DD Form 214. His records show that at the time he enlisted, his spouse resided at the address in Memphis, Tennessee, that is contained on his DD Form 214 dated 2 March 1991. However, there is no evidence to show that he was recommended for any awards that are not contained on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004727

    Original file (20110004727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his pay grade as E-5 and his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) as 44C2O (Welder). His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows his pay grade as E-4 and his PMOS as 13A1O. In the absence of evidence to show he was promoted to pay grade E-5 and that PMOS 44C2O was awarded prior to his REFRAD on 14 February 1972, there appears to be no basis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020287

    Original file (20090020287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A second DD Form 214 documents the applicant's service from 5 June 1979 to his retirement on 31 May 1993. Although the applicant states his retirement DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect he entered active duty at Fort Polk, the evidence of record shows, on 5 June 1979, the applicant reenlisted at Coleman Barracks in Mannheim, Germany.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009041

    Original file (20070009041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), Item 35 (Record of Assignments) shows, in pertinent part, that on 29 November 1975, the applicant was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Battalion, 3rd Brigade, Fort Ord, California, in duty military occupational specialty code (MOSC) 09B0O for the purpose of attending BCT. On 8 April 1975, the colonel serving as Commander, School Brigade, U.S. Army Signal School, Fort Gordon, Georgia, approved the separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012510

    Original file (20080012510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show that he entered active duty at Fort Ord, California on 24 June 1971 and not on 31 August 1977, which was his second enlistment. This regulation further states that for the entry in Block 12a (Date Entered AD [Active Duty] This Period, enter the beginning date of the continuous period of AD for issuance of this DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. Inasmuch as the applicant had received DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608077C070209

    Original file (9608077C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 March 1974 the applicant’s commanding officer recommended that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 because of his civil conviction. The applicant was discharged at Fort Gordon on 28 March 1974. The requirement for a board of officers could be waived by the separation authority provided the individual concerned was physically in civil custody at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012055

    Original file (20100012055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that his date of entry and date of discharge reflected on his DD Form 214 is incorrect. Therefore, in the absence of such...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020417

    Original file (20120020417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his retirement shows that he entered active duty on 4 April 1977 and that he served 14 years, 3 months and 27 days of net active service this period and 5 years, 10 months and 29 days of prior active service. The applicant was issued DD Forms 214 up to 3 April 1977 in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020199

    Original file (20130020199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting the entry "TRACK...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009643

    Original file (20110009643.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his individual and unit awards be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). After serving in four campaigns, on 31 March 1969 he departed Vietnam for assignment to Fort Gordon, Georgia where he remained until he was transferred to Thailand on 5 May 1970 for duty with the 93d Psyop Detachment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...