Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020417
Original file (20120020417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 June 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120020417 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show in block 12a. that he entered active duty on 5 May 1971 instead of 4 April 1977. 

2.  The applicant states that he enlisted in the Army at Fort Hamilton, New York on 4 April 1971; however, his DD Form 214 shows that he entered active duty in 1977.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted at Fort Hamilton, New York on 5 May 1971.  He completed his basic training at Fort Dix, New Jersey and his advanced individual training as a military policemen at Fort Gordon, Georgia.

3.  On 2 January 1973 he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment and would have been issued a DD Form 214, but it is not available.  On 3 January 1973 he reenlisted for a period of 4 years.  He extended that enlistment for a period of 6 months on 19 December 1973

4.  On 3 April 1977 he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment and would have been issued a DD Form 214, but it is not available.  On 4 April 1977 he reenlisted for a period of 6 years.  He remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments and was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on   1 February 1989.

5.  On 31 July 1991 he was honorably retired and was transferred to the Retired List effective 1 August 1991.  He had served 20 years, 2 months and 26 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his retirement shows that he entered active duty on 4 April 1977 and that he served 14 years, 3 months and 27 days of net active service this period and 5 years, 10 months and 29 days of prior active service.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will reflect active service that is performed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 and will reflect prior active service as well.  However, effective 1 October 1979 the regulation was changed to eliminate the issuance of a DD Form 214 for immediate reenlistments.  A break in service in excess of 24 hours required that a DD Form 214 be issued from that point and continues to present day.  A DD Form 214 may not be issued to cover a period of service already documented by a previously-issued DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted and were found to lack merit.  The applicant was issued DD Forms 214 up to 3 April 1977 in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time.

2.  Following the period his last DD Form 214 was issued the regulation changed and provided that the DD Form 214 would no longer be issued for immediate reenlistments.  Accordingly, his service began (for the purpose of issuing DD Forms 214) the day following the issuance of his last DD Form 214.

3.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 was properly prepared in accordance with the applicable regulation and properly reflects that he entered this period of active duty on 4 April 1977.

4.  As a matter of information for the applicant, if the total prior active service in block 12d is subtracted from the date in block 12a, it will result in the date the applicant originally entered active duty.

5.  Accordingly, the applicant’s DD Form 214 is properly prepared, reflects all of his service and there is no error in his case to be corrected.  Therefore, there is no basis to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120020417





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120020417



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016768

    Original file (20100016768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, her records should be corrected at this time to reflect in block 7a of her DD Form 214 that she entered active duty in Brooklyn, New York. Accordingly, her DD Form 214 reflected all of her service from 1978 to 1995 and reflected her prior active service as well. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing in block 7a of her DD Form 214 dated 31 May 1995 that she entered active duty in Brooklyn,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711270

    Original file (9711270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS : Correction of his military records to show that he was inducted on 23 March 1970 instead of 17 March 1971. He states he was drafted “from Fort Hamilton in Brooklyn, New York and from there sent to Fort Dix, New Jersey were [he] started [his] basic training.” PURPOSE : To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. The applicant has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008483

    Original file (20120008483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was discharged from active duty in pay grade E-1 on 27 August 1974 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 13-5b(3). The DD Form 214 will be prepared for all personnel at the time of retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years and entered on active duty on 13 April 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012510

    Original file (20080012510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show that he entered active duty at Fort Ord, California on 24 June 1971 and not on 31 August 1977, which was his second enlistment. This regulation further states that for the entry in Block 12a (Date Entered AD [Active Duty] This Period, enter the beginning date of the continuous period of AD for issuance of this DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. Inasmuch as the applicant had received DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018753

    Original file (20100018753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that block 7a (Place of Entry into Active Duty) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show El Paso, Texas, instead of Brooklyn, New York. His initial DD Form 4 shows he entered active duty at Fort Hamilton, New York. There is no evidence in his official military personnel file and he provided none that shows he was residing in and entered active duty in El Paso, Texas.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003765

    Original file (20150003765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 December 1992 to show he entered active duty on 6 June 1971. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 with an effective date of 17 May 1972 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 6 June 1974 * DD Form 4, dated 31 May 1977 DD Form 214 with a separation date of 31 December 1992 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021032

    Original file (20100021032.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 December 1997 * U.S. Army Official Military Personnel File (microfiche) * 1973 enlistment contract * DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 July 1977 * 1973 U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlistment contract * Orders, dated 26 April 1973 * Oath of extension of enlistment * Individual Training Record * Certificate of Training * Service personnel records * Defense Finance and Accounting Service Military Leave and Earnings Statement *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002529

    Original file (20090002529.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 MC issued at this time shows the applicant served on active duty for six months during this period. Under the earlier provisions of Army Regulation 635-5, the applicant was properly issued DD Forms 214 for his periods of service from 19 September 1972 through 25 November 1973, from 28 July 1976 through 21 December 1977, and 22 December 1977 through 29 November 1978. The applicant is correct that the DOE on the 31 July 1996 DD Form 214 is in error; however, the correct DOE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018097

    Original file (20100018097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he entered the Army June 1971 and served for 12 years and 5 months; however, his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that he entered active duty on 27 July 1978 and while it reflects his two tours in Germany it does not reflect is tour in Korea. His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge shows that he entered active duty this period (block 12a) on 27 July 1978 and that he had served 5 years, 9 months, and 13 days of service that period. Therefore, it appears...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016290

    Original file (20130016290.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 September 1992 to show: a. he entered active duty on 11 June 1971 and b. award of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). The applicant states: * his basic active service date (BASD) is 11 June 1971, but his DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 30 November 1977 * his DD Form 214 shows he has prior service and he never left the service until...