Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020625
Original file (20100020625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020625 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  The applicant states it is a clerical error that his DD Form 214 does not show the Combat Infantryman Badge.  He adds the award was posted to the local newspaper by the Army.  He further adds he was a rifle platoon leader and time in country (Vietnam) with Company B, 1st Battalion, 12th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division was an automatic qualifier for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214, Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division General Orders Number 3815 (Bronze Star Medal award), Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division General Orders Number 3906 (Air Medal award), photograph of promotion to captain, and photocopy of newspaper article describing award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 April 1968.  He was later appointed as a commissioned officer and assigned to the Infantry branch with a primary military occupational specialty (MOS) of 1542.

3.  His DD Form 214 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 15 August 1969 to 14 August 1970.  Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division General Orders Number 3815, dated 10 July 1970, show his unit of assignment was Company B, 1st Battalion, 12th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division.

4.  On 3 March 1972, he was released from active duty and transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  His DD Form 214 shows he had attained the rank of captain.  It further shows he completed a total of 3 years, 9 months, and 20 days of active duty service.

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Air Medal, Bronze Star Medal, and two overseas bars.

6.  The available records are void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge by proper authority.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant held an infantry MOS and was assigned to a qualifying infantry unit.  The newspaper article indicating he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and a photograph showing the Combat Infantryman Badge on the uniform, provided by the applicant do not present sufficient corroborating evidence to support his contention he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.  Additionally, there is no specific available evidence he was personally present and participated with the qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  As such, it would not be appropriate to add this badge to his DD Form 214.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

____    ____ ___  ___ _____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  _____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020625



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020625



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013045

    Original file (20080013045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submitted a self-authored statement, two notarized statements from two squad leaders, miscellaneous photographs of various Soldiers, copies of his unit’s morning reports, Internet printouts, and radio local news and newspaper articles, which were not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, they are considered new evidence and as such warrant consideration by the Board. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. Therefore, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005108

    Original file (20110005108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100007232, on 20 July 2010. The applicant's new evidence consists of a newspaper article, undated, wherein it stated the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded to the applicant in Vietnam. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000377

    Original file (20150000377.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * Citation for award of the Army Commendation Medal * Newspaper articles and photographs * Guide for Information and Assistance for Dependents/Parents of members of the 4th Infantry Division * Internet printout of a map of an area in Vietnam CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015639

    Original file (20120015639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a statement, dated 22 March 2012, from Mr. M_____ * an undated statement from Mr. S______ * a drivers license and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) identification card for Mr. S______ * a list of Soldiers assigned to the 3rd Battalion, 12th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division * an undated newspaper article * excerpts from the book Apache Recon: Because of the Brave by Mr. M_____ * four photographs * an excerpt from Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007774

    Original file (20080007774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was assigned MOS 11B and he was assigned to an infantry company while in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to award the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's military personnel records show he participated in five campaigns during his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005977

    Original file (20110005977.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the CIB at a firebase in Vietnam. His unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation while he was assigned to the unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the CIB, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005173

    Original file (20090005173.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant states that he was wounded on 17 December 1967 while serving as an infantry squad leader in his infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008567

    Original file (20080008567.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Silver Star and the Army Commendation Medal. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to add the Silver Star, the Army Commendation Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008436

    Original file (20090008436.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Records show that the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003494

    Original file (20150003494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003494 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provided a statement, dated 4 November 2014, from Mr. C. Mr. C provided a newspaper article that reported he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge on 8 April 1967 and he was assigned to HHC, 1st Battalion, 69th Armor of the 25th Infantry Division. This met the requirement of being assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller unit for...