Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020346
Original file (20100020346 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020346 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and elected spouse only coverage within one year of his marriage.

2.  The applicant states that in approximately May 2009 he went to the Family Services office at Cannon Air Force Base to inquire about enrolling his future spouse in the SBP.  He was told that she would not be eligible until they had been married for one year and to come back then.  At that time no information was given to him.  After being married for a year, he went back only to find out that he was beyond the one year window to complete the paperwork.  He contends he failed to enroll his spouse within a year of his marriage due to a misunderstanding. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his marriage certificate and a notarized DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate), dated 28 July 2010.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the New Mexico Army National Guard on 12 August 1986 and he served continuously in the ARNG until he was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 27 May 2001.

2.  He was issued his twenty-year letter on 18 August 2000.  On 6 October 2000, he completed a DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) in which he confirmed he was not married and had no dependent children.  In item 9c he elected option A, which stated he declined to make an election at the time and   he would remain eligible to make an election for coverage at age 60.

3.  On the same date, he completed an AHRC Form 3854 (Reserve Component Supplement SBP Election Certificate (RC-SSBP)).  Again, he declined coverage and indicated he did not have a spouse or dependent children.

4.  According to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) officials he completed a DD Form 2656 on 26 January 2006 and again indicated he had no spouse or dependent children.

5.  On 25 January 2008, he turned age 60 and began receiving his non-regular retirement pay.

6.  On 4 July 2009, he married his current spouse.

7.  The applicant provides a notarized SBP Election Change Certificate, dated 
28 July 2010, wherein he elects "Spouse Only Coverage" and "Full Retired Pay."

8.  Public Law 92-425, enacted on 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

9.  Public Law 94-496, enacted 14 October 1976, established a waiting period of 1 year following post-retirement marriage.  The legislative history of the SBP shows that Congress’ purpose in requiring a 1-year waiting period was to prevent sham marriages and to prevent spouses who become widows/widowers of SBP participants only by virtue of a short-term marriage after retirement from automatically receiving an annuity.

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married upon becoming eligible to participate in SBP but who later marries may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date in which that person marries. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be allowed to enroll in the SBP for spouse only coverage because he was not properly informed by his servicing personnel office to enroll within 1 year of his marriage.

2.  The evidence shows he initially declined RCSBP coverage at the time of his transfer to the Retired Reserves because he was unmarried and had no dependent children.  He married on 4 July 2009, and on 28 July 2010 he attempted to enroll in SBP for "Spouse Only" coverage.

3.  He contends that he was misinformed by his servicing personnel office that he could not apply for SBP coverage for his spouse until he had been married for one year.  Public Law 94-496 established a waiting period of one year for vesting following post-retirement marriage to prevent spouses from automatically receiving an annuity from a short term or sham marriage.  This is different from Title 10 USC 1448(a) (5) which states a person who later marries may make a written election to the Secretary concerned within one year of the marriage.  

4.  The evidence shows he attempted to change his election shortly after his first anniversary date, within 24 days, which would indicate his intent was to comply with the SBP election guidelines and is consistent with the misinformation he allegedly received from Government officials.   

5.  In view of the above Government error, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show he elected spouse coverage within one year of his marriage and to collect premiums from the applicant based on the date of his marriage, 4 July 2009, for such coverage.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:


	a.  showing he elected to enroll for spouse-only SBP coverage based on his full retirement pay, effective 4 July 2009; and having

	b.  the Defense and Finance Accounting Service collect any premiums due.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020346





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020346



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013902

    Original file (20110013902.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He submitted the following: * An empty envelope from DFAS, addressed to the applicant and postmarked 21 June 2010 * A DD Form 2894, which shows he designated his current spouse as the sole beneficiary to receive any unpaid retired pay upon his death, on 25 July 2010 * A DD Form 2656-6, which shows he elected to change his SBP election from "child only" to "spouse only," signed and notarized on 1 July 2011 6. Item 8 of his DD Form 2656-6 clearly states "A member, who does not have a spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002256

    Original file (20120002256.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 24 November 2008, he elected "spouse and child" SBP coverage in anticipation of retiring. The applicant requests a change of his SBP coverage to show he elected "spouse only" coverage within 1 year of marriage. The evidence provided by the applicant shows on that on 16 February 2011 he requested to change/add his new spouse as his SBP beneficiary which was approximately 25 days beyond the 1-year period to make such an election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015270

    Original file (20100015270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that he and the former service member (FSM) lived together as husband and wife for 3 years prior to the date of their marriage. By letter, AR-PERSCOM, Transition and Separations Branch notified the applicant that he was not eligible for the FSM’s SBP annuity because he and the FSM were not married for one full year before the FSM’s date of death. Public records show the applicant and the FSM were married on 26 February 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086846C070212

    Original file (2003086846C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he married in June 2000. He was told at that time that it was too late to enroll, that he had to enroll "within" 2 years of getting married. The Board concludes that it would be equitable to correct the applicant's records to show he enrolled in the SBP for spouse coverage in a timely manner.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000575

    Original file (20120000575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The first marriage license shows the applicant (B.B., currently known as S.B.) DFAS stated since she and the FSM were not married at his date of retirement and because they were previously divorced, she did not meet the 1-year marriage requirement. The applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to show her entitlement to SBP as a former spouse, which would have been granted in a divorce decree or in an SBP Election Form.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075048C070403

    Original file (2002075048C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60 th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The applicant and the FSM formally married on 10 February 1995 and the FSM died on 17 May 1995. If the applicant can provide evidence to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010361

    Original file (20120010361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DA Form 2656-6, Section III (Conditions that Trigger Eligibility to Change Coverage), Number 8 (I Am Requesting a Change in Coverage Based On:), shows the FSM marked the "Marriage" block which stated, "A member, who does not have a spouse at the time of initial eligibility, may provide SBP for the first spouse acquired after retirement by elective coverage before the first anniversary of that marriage. He and the applicant were married on 7 August 2009. The evidence of record shows her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003348

    Original file (20110003348.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he elected his wife as his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) beneficiary within a year of their marriage. Since the applicant did not apply for SBP within a year of his marriage in 1999, he could not later elect SBP unless there was an open season. The applicant requested spouse and child SBP coverage when he applied for retired pay; however, he was not entitled to do so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022811

    Original file (20100022811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) provided by DFAS shows the following: * retirement date – 1 October 2004 * spouse – F____ * child – S____ with a date of birth of 23 July 1991 * SBP election – 26b, coverage for spouse and child(ren) * date signed – 7 July 2004 4. DFAS stated in an email to this Board, dated 9 May 2011, the FSM's DD Form 2656 was submitted by Fort Carson on 3 November 2004 and shows he elected spouse and child(ren) coverage. The applicant and the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027839

    Original file (20100027839.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a letter from DFAS Retired and Annuity Pay, dated 23 August 2010, the applicant was informed that they could not process his SBP request because notification of gaining spouse must have been received within 1 year of the marriage to add a spouse. The member may elect not to participate (with their spouse’s concurrence, if required), but the election must be made before the first day for which the member is eligible to receive retired pay. As a result, the Board recommends that all...