Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020240
Original file (20100020240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    22 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020240 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  He states he served as a combat infantryman in the 2nd Battalion, 12th Cavalry, in An Khe, Vietnam, from 1965 to 1966 and was involved in direct combat with the enemy.

3.  He provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 18 September 1964.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 36A (Wireman).

3.  He served in Vietnam from 15 August 1965 to on or about 31 July 1966 with Company C, 2nd Battalion, 12th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division.  He performed duties in duty MOS 36A as a wireman.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not list the CIB in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).  His personnel records do not contain orders which show he was awarded the CIB.

5.  He was released from active duty on 1 August 1966.  His DD Form 214 does not show entitlement to the CIB.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) states that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he served as a combat infantryman and was involved in direct combat with the enemy.  However, there is insufficient evidence on which to correct his record to show award of the CIB in this case.

2.  To support award of the CIB, he is required to have been an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties while assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit engaged in active ground combat and he must have actively participated in such ground combat.

3.  The evidence of record shows he served as a wireman in duty MOS 36A while assigned to Company C, 2nd Battalion, 12th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division, during his tour in Vietnam.  Therefore, he does not meet the requirements for award of the CIB.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X___   ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________ X___________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020240



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020240



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018094

    Original file (20090018094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CIB entry on the applicant's DA Form 20 is not supported by any other evidence of record. The available evidence shows the applicant served in an infantry unit. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015687

    Original file (20080015687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this same document had an entry which showed that he was awarded the CIB, but this entry, which did not contain an authority for awarding the CIB, was also struck through. There is no evidence that he performed duties in MOS 11 on his DA Form 20. Further, although he provides pictures from his service in the RVN, these pictures do not conclusively show that he was performing infantryman duties or that he was actively engaged in combat against the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013943

    Original file (20110013943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 4 November 1966 through 3 August 1968 and to add this award to his DD Form 214. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005692

    Original file (20130005692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's available records that show he was awarded an infantry MOS or that he was assigned or attached to Company C, 1st Battalion, 12th Cavalry Regiment during his service in Vietnam. This pamphlet does not show his units of assignment while in Vietnam were awarded the PUC. There is also no official evidence indicating his units of assignment while in Vietnam were awarded the PUC or any official evidence indicating he was assigned or attached to Company C,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010705

    Original file (20140010705.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier requests for correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Valorous Unit Award (VUA), and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There was no evidence in the applicant's available records that show he was awarded an infantry MOS or that he was assigned or attached to Company C, 1st Battalion, 12th Cavalry Regiment during his service in Vietnam. The majority of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010526

    Original file (20140010526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this badge. Unit Orders Number 27, dated 28 September 1966, issued by Company A, 228th Aviation Battalion, wherein he was promoted to the rank of SP4. This regulation also stated the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003040C070205

    Original file (20060003040C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. There is no evidence of record which shows he held an infantry MOS while assigned to an infantry unit during combat in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011122

    Original file (20090011122.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States and he entered active service on 10 December 1963. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not submit sufficient evidence that shows he held an infantry MOS, was assigned and/or attached to an infantry unit, or that he was an active participant in combat while assigned to his infantry unit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008310

    Original file (20090008310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the CIB on the same date he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records that show he was awarded the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000410C070206

    Original file (20050000410C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS or served in ground combat as an infantryman. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.