Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018094
Original file (20090018094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  29 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018094 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the CIB while he was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), but there is no record of this award.

3.  The applicant submitted no additional documents in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 September 1962.  He completed the required training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 36A (wireman).  He was honorably discharged on 5 September 1965.  He subsequently enlisted on 1 March 1966 and served in MOS 31G (Tactical Communications Chief).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN during the following periods:

* 17 March 1966-13 September 1967, 1st Battalion, 27th Infantry Regiment, with duties as a wireman
* 22 August 1968-21 August 1969, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, with duties as a communications sergeant
* 2 December 1970-8 April 1971, 242nd Aviation Company, with duties as a communications sergeant

4.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows that Special Order Number 222, Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, dated 1966, awarded him the CIB.

5.  The CIB entry on the applicant's DA Form 20 is not supported by any other evidence of record.

6.  On 5 October 1973, the applicant was honorably discharged.  He had completed 10 years, 11 months, and 11 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued shows he was credited with five campaigns, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), two letters of appreciation, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), a letter of commendation, a certificate of achievement, and the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster.  This DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the CIB.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Although the applicant's DA Form 20 shows award of the CIB, there is no corroborating evidence to verify the basis for this entry.  The available evidence shows the applicant served in an infantry unit.  However, the evidence does not show that he held an infantry MOS while serving with his unit.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___ X___  __ X___       DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018094



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015687

    Original file (20080015687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this same document had an entry which showed that he was awarded the CIB, but this entry, which did not contain an authority for awarding the CIB, was also struck through. There is no evidence that he performed duties in MOS 11 on his DA Form 20. Further, although he provides pictures from his service in the RVN, these pictures do not conclusively show that he was performing infantryman duties or that he was actively engaged in combat against the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008791

    Original file (20090008791.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record that showed the applicant served in active ground combat during his tour in the RVN and as a result concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000334

    Original file (20080000334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records showing he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. This document also shows that at the time of his assignment to the unit, the unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Headquarters, Department of the Army, General Orders Number 48 (1971). The applicant contends, in effect, that his discharge document should be corrected to show he held MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman), MOS 91B...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017262

    Original file (20100017262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His infantry MOS and assignment to an infantry unit are not in question; however, there is no evidence in the available records, and the submitted evidence is insufficient, to show his participation in active ground combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013943

    Original file (20110013943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 4 November 1966 through 3 August 1968 and to add this award to his DD Form 214. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007790

    Original file (20120007790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, there is no evidence of record that indicates he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB during his active duty service. Notwithstanding his sincerity and the apparent issuance of the CIB (1st Award) to him by TACOM, in the absence of official documentary evidence that conclusively shows he was personally present with a qualifying infantry unit when it was engaged in active ground...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003438C071029

    Original file (20070003438C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. It confirms that during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, the applicant’s unit (2nd Battalion, 22nd Infantry Regiment) received the PUC, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. By regulation, in order to support award of the CIB there must be evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014966

    Original file (20090014966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he should have been awarded the CIB because he was injured in combat and awarded the Purple Heart. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence nor did the applicant submit any evidence that shows he held an infantry MOS during his assignment in the RVN. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018228

    Original file (20130018228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence also shows he participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars; and b. adding to his DD Form 214 the : * Bronze Star Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018922

    Original file (20090018922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states that although his DD Form 214 does not show he was assigned to an infantry unit he was on patrol daily, was combat proficiency trained, and it was his duty to protect his survey squad, and submits a VA Form 21-4138(Statement in Support of Claim) as his personal statement. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Although the applicant submitted newspaper article about a captain in...