Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019948
Original file (20100019948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100019948 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his date of separation as 10 April 2010.

2.  The applicant states he never volunteered for an early release from active duty (REFRAD).  His 8-month early release is an injustice and should be corrected.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his orders retaining him on active duty, dated 27 April 2009; his DD Form 214 ending on 20 August 2009; and a memorandum from the applicant to the Commander, Warrior Training Battalion, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, dated 14 August 2009.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was ordered to active duty from the U.S. Army Reserve effective 3 October 2008.  On 27 April 2009, orders A-04-912129, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis (HRC-STL), Missouri, retained the applicant on active duty for a period of 328 days from 14 May 2009 to 6 April 2010.   

2.  In a memorandum addressed to the Commander, Transition Service Office, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, dated 13 August 2009, the Officer-in-Charge, Medical Support Branch, HRC-STL, stated that the request for an early REFRAD had been approved.  The applicant's REFRAD was to be no later than 24 September 2009.
3.  Orders 229-0255, U.S. Army Installation Management Command, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, dated 17 August 2009, as amended on 20 August 2009 by Orders 232-0254, directed the REFRAD of the applicant effective 20 August 2009 with eligibility to receive transitional health care until 19 February 2010.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows in:

	a.  Item 12b (Separation Date This Period): 20 August 2009;

	b.  Item 18 (Remarks): retained on active duty for medical care and treatment from 14 May to 20 August 2009; and

	c.  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation): Completion of required active service. 

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of REFRAD, retirement, or discharge.  The DD Form 214 is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service.  It provides that the entry in Item 12b will be the Soldier's transition date.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was REFRAD on 10 April 2010 because his orders retaining him on active duty indicate that date.

2.  The available evidence shows that the applicant was REFRAD on 20 August 2009 due to completing his required active duty service.  There is no evidence that he in fact served any active duty after this date.

3.  The applicant's implied contention that his orders dictate his retention on active duty to 10 April 2010 is found to be without merit.  He was retained for the purpose of receiving medical treatment.  It appears his care did not require retention beyond 20 August 2009.

4.  There is no evidence of error or injustice in this case.

5.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019948





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019948



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008691

    Original file (20120008691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available medical records consist of only two periodic physical examinations, dated 12 October 2001 and 5 July 2006. HRC Orders A-04-912129A01, dated 9 November 2009, amended the HRC Orders A-04-912129 to show an end date change from 6 April 2010 to 20 August 2009. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015248

    Original file (20100015248.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Fort Stewart and Hunter Army Airfield, Orders Number 028-0178, dated 28 January 2010, show his effective date of release from active duty as 28 February 2009. The evidence shows his separation date is incorrect on his separation orders and DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Headquarters, Fort Stewart and Hunter Army Airfield, Orders 028-0178, dated 28 January 2010, to show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016165

    Original file (20080016165.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his mobilization orders and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he served on active duty from "4 November 2006 to 28 July 2007" instead of "4 November 2006 to 9 February 2007." The evidence of record shows that the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of OIF and entered active duty as ordered. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008967

    Original file (20120008967.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was serving on active duty until 15 May 2009, and if the recommendation as stated throughout the opinion to change the 48 days of accrued leave to transition leave is approved, then the release date should be 2 June 2009. As stated in paragraph 2b of the opinion memorandum, "Given the lack of removal documentation through 15 May 2009, there is an implied duty status"; therefore, his service time should have ended on 15 May 2009, not 24 March 2009 as evidenced by valid orders and time and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012467

    Original file (20100012467.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 23 September 2009, Headquarters, IMCOM, Fort Knox, KY, published Orders 266-0175, ordering his release from active duty, effective 17 October 2009. On 23 March 2010, Headquarters, IMCOM, Fort Knox, KY, published Orders 082-0168, ordering his release from active duty, effective 22 April 2010. The evidence of record shows the applicant entered active duty on 21 April 2008 and he was scheduled to be released from active duty on 17 April 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012639

    Original file (20080012639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the State of North Carolina published orders on 2 January 1996 which indicate the applicant was being processed for separation and that he was authorized disability severance pay. Since it appears the applicant was not properly informed that if he accepted severance pay then he would not be eligible for retired pay, and since he understands that granting his request would require him to pay back his severance pay, it would be equitable to restore the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020880

    Original file (20130020880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following additional documents in support of her request: a. medical consults for urology, psychology, psychiatry, podiatry, and dermatology, dated 24 September 2010; b. WAMC memorandum, dated 23 November 2010, that authorized the applicant 10 days convalescent leave; c. Health Net Federal Services letter, dated 27 July 2011, that authorized the applicant surgical care from 19 July 2011 to 21 November 2011 for follow-up visits for Solitary Cyst of Breast and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013630

    Original file (20100013630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 14 December 2009 be changed from 26 August 2007 to 15 December 2008. The applicant provides her DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 December 2009; email transmissions; assignment orders, dated 17 December 2008; and separation orders, dated 7 December 2009. She was advised to submit an application to this Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019406

    Original file (20090019406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of her 31 July 2009 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show an entry date of 30 August 2006. The instructions for item 12a are to enter the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of a DD Form 214 for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. The evidence of record contains permanent orders which show the applicant was ordered to active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014045

    Original file (20100014045.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states she requested a waiver to retain her rank of LTC upon her retirement, but her request was not processed in timely manner. E-mail from the Chief, PAD, dated 29 June 2009, to the applicant stated the approval authority for her request to retain her rank of LTC was the Secretary of the Army. Evidence of record further shows she submitted her request for retirement and a TIG waiver in April 2009 with a requested retirement date of 1 September 2009.