Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019644
Original file (20100019644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  3 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100019644 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC).

2.  He states the Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the 4th Infantry Division (ID), Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, was awarded the PUC for the period 29 October to 30 November 1967, by Department of the Army General Orders Number 38, dated 1971.

3.  He provides excerpts from the pamphlet and an article from the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) magazine.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090005245, on 10 September 2009.

2.  The VFW Article, titled "4th Division's Role Often Overlooked" explains that the 4th ID had a more significant role than they were given credit for.  The author stated the 1st Brigade lost 86 killed in action (KIA) during Dak To, with the 3rd Battalion, 8th Infantry Regiment, accounting for 46 KIA, and 3rd Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, sacrificing 24 KIA.  The 4th ID commander said the brutal fighting was the worst they had as confirmed by the 1st Brigade's PUC for defeating a numerically superior enemy.

3.  In the previous case, it was noted that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 27 August 1967 to 2 September 1968 and he was assigned to Company E, 3rd Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, 4th ID.

4.  A review of item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) also shows he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, 4th ID, from       15 September to 24 October 1967, prior to his assignment to Company E on      25 October 1967.

5.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3, page 18, lists the unit awards received by 3rd Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, to which he was assigned.  As stated in the previous case, it shows his unit was awarded the PUC in recognition of actions during the period 18 to 26 May 1967. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant provided excerpts from the Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 that shows the 4th ID, Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, was awarded the PUC for the period 29 October 1967 to 30 November 1967, there is no evidence that he was assigned to that unit.

2.  Evidence shows he was assigned to 3rd Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment for the duration of his tour in the Republic of Vietnam from 15 September 1967 to 31 August 1968.  The evidence also shows this unit was awarded the PUC in recognition of actions during the period 18 to 26 May 1967, but he was not assigned to the unit during the period it was cited for this award.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting his requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  __x______  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20090005245, dated 10 September 2009.



      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019644



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019644



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010705

    Original file (20140010705.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier requests for correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Valorous Unit Award (VUA), and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There was no evidence in the applicant's available records that show he was awarded an infantry MOS or that he was assigned or attached to Company C, 1st Battalion, 12th Cavalry Regiment during his service in Vietnam. The majority of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005692

    Original file (20130005692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's available records that show he was awarded an infantry MOS or that he was assigned or attached to Company C, 1st Battalion, 12th Cavalry Regiment during his service in Vietnam. This pamphlet does not show his units of assignment while in Vietnam were awarded the PUC. There is also no official evidence indicating his units of assignment while in Vietnam were awarded the PUC or any official evidence indicating he was assigned or attached to Company C,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015831

    Original file (20130015831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120019586 on 30 May 2013. His new argument has been noted; however, there is no available evidence of record showing that the applicant was assigned or attached to the Forward Observer Team...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084988C070212

    Original file (2003084988C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s records that show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant received the required training and was awarded the infantryman MOS. b. amending the applicant's DD Form 214 to show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Sharpshooter Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), the Marksman Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015639

    Original file (20120015639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a statement, dated 22 March 2012, from Mr. M_____ * an undated statement from Mr. S______ * a drivers license and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) identification card for Mr. S______ * a list of Soldiers assigned to the 3rd Battalion, 12th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division * an undated newspaper article * excerpts from the book Apache Recon: Because of the Brave by Mr. M_____ * four photographs * an excerpt from Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000644

    Original file (20080000644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self-Authored Letter, dated 12 December 2007; DD Form 214; Department of the Army (DA) PUC General Orders (GO) Number (#) 25, dated 8 June 2001 and GO # 75, dated 2 December 1969; Officer Qualification Record (DA Form 66); and Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division Special Orders (SO) # 32, dated 1 February 1968. However, the evidence of record confirms his entitlement to one award of the PUC based on his service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018274

    Original file (20140018274.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 7 August 1968 through 15 June 1970 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 7 August 1968 through 15 June 1970; and b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005912

    Original file (20140005912.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * authorization for issuance of awards, dated 29 November 1984 * citations for award of the Presidential Unit Award and Valorous Unit Award CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013942

    Original file (20130013942.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting award of the VSM with one bronze service star...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017875

    Original file (20110017875.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 March 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110017875 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence also shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation the applicant is also eligible for award of the RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation, RVNCAHM FC Unit Citation, and 4 bronze service stars to be worn with his already-awarded VSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...