Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017875
Original file (20110017875.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    6 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017875 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) be added to his record and DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).  

2.  The applicant states the unit he served with in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) was awarded the PUC for the period 5 to 10 May 1968, while he was assigned to the unit.  

3.  The applicant provides Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 60, dated 17 October 1969, in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The available record shows after completing Officer Candidate School (OCS) in an enlisted status, the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant in the Infantry of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and entered an active duty status on 9 June 1967.  

3.  The applicant’s DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 8 February 1968 through 7 February 1969.  Item 18 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour he was assigned to:

* Company D, 4th Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment from 10 February through 4 May 1968 performing duties as an infantry platoon leader
* Headquarters and Headquarters (HHC) Company, 4th Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment from 5 May 1968 through 5 February 1969  

4.  On 8 September 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty, in the rank of first lieutenant, after completing 2 years and 2 months of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he earned the following awards:

* National Defense Service Medal 
* Vietnam Service Medal (VSM)
* Silver Star
* Army Good Conduct Medal
* Bronze Star Medal (BSM) 1st Oak Leaf Cluster with “V” (Valor) Device
* RVN Campaign Medal 
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Valorous Unit Award

5.  Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) assists commanders in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.  It shows that during the applicant’s tenure of assignment, his units (Company D and HHC, 4th Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment) received the following awards for the periods and in the DAGOs indicated:

* VUA, 31 January-19 February 1968, DAGO 48, dated 1968
* RVN Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) with Palm Unit Citation, 19 June 1968-
31 July 1970, DAGO 51, dated 1971
* RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal (RVNCAHM) First Class (FC) Unit Citation, 12 December 1966-31 August 1970, DAGO 51, dated 1971
* PUC, 5-10 May 1968, DAGO 60, dated 1969

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army’s awards policy.  Paragraph 2-13 contains guidance on the VSM.  It states a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN.  Table B-1 contains a list of RVN campaigns and shows that during the applicant’s tenure of assignment participation credit was granted for the following campaigns:

* TET Counteroffensive (30 January-1 April 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV (2 April-30 June 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V (1 July-1 November 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI (2 November 1968-22 February 1969)

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to add the PUC to his record and DD Form 214 has been carefully considered and found to have merit.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s unit in the RVN was awarded the PUC for the period 
5-10 May 1968, during his tenure of assignment.  As a result, it would be appropriate to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. 

2.  The evidence also shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation the applicant is also eligible for award of the RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation, RVNCAHM FC Unit Citation, and 4 bronze service stars to be worn with his already-awarded VSM.  

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 8 September 1969 as follows:


   a.  deleting the current Vietnam Service Medal entry; and 
   
   b.  adding the Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and Presidential Unit Citation.



      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017875



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017875



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015901

    Original file (20110015901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM with “V” Device for heroism in the RVN on 9 May 1968 and this award was announced and authorized in GOs issued by the 199th Infantry Brigade, as evidenced by an entry in item 41 of his DA Form 20. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012755

    Original file (20120012755.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 7 January 1968 through 2 January 1969. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the DA Form 20 does not list the ARCOM and indicates the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was requested. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 31 July 1967...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016999

    Original file (20110016999.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during the applicant's tenure of assignment in the RVN, his unit, Company B, 2nd Battalion, 22nd Infantry Regiment was cited for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013439

    Original file (20110013439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214, item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), lists the following earned awards: * NDSM * RVNCM with Device * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * ARCOM 8. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 30 November 1965 through 13 November 1967, and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017982

    Original file (20070017982.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following members, a quorum, were present: The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with the VSM for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. There is no evidence of record that indicates the applicant's unit received the MUC for service in the RVN, or that any RVN campaign was identified or titled Coronado.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020485

    Original file (20090020485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his deceased father be awarded two Silver Stars and two additional awards of the Bronze Star Medal; however, there are no orders or other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File authorizing these awards. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the Heavy Mortar Company of the 180th Infantry Regiment in Korea, this unit was awarded the Distinguished Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014411

    Original file (20110014411.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows the applicant earned three marksmanship badges that were not listed in item 24 of his DD Form 214. However, his unit was never cited for award of the MUC at any time during its service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Vietnam Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007005

    Original file (20120007005.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the Purple Heart (PH) he earned be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 22 August 1967 through 27 April 1969, and by adding this award to his record and DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002765

    Original file (20120002765.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued lists the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVN Campaign Medal (RVNCM) * ARCOM with “V” Device * Combat Medical Badge * BSM 8. Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 4 April 1968 through 4 January 1970, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020701

    Original file (20090020701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states the SSN in item 3 of his DD Form 214 is incorrect. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his REFRAD on 14 November 1968 lists the SSN he now claims is incorrect in item 3.